Something's happening here

Amanda - Ridgewood, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:01:53 GMT

Kudos for admitting that all of the press got it wrong in NH. Watching various stations prior to Senator Clinton's victory I was beginning to wonder why even continue having an election process as the collective media had already elected/appointed/installed Obama as the next President. Good for the people of NH for voting their hearts and minds and not just getting swept away in the hullabaloo created by the media swarm.

I realize it can be extremely difficult to report campaign/election related news with a total sense of neutrality. That said, viewers of all news broadcasts want, need and should demand a fair representation of the process and ALL of the candidates.

November's election day is a long way off, can we wait till the polls close at least on the east before declaring a victor?

Something's happening here

LAM, Atlanta, Georgia — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:05:33 GMT

Something's happening here

Linda, WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:06:10 GMT

Delegates won so far:
John Edwards 18
Hillary Clinton 24
Barak Obama 25

Why is John Edwards ignored in this definitely 3 person race?

Something's happening here

Fair Treatment — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:06:40 GMT

Brian, I always felt you to be objective. Thanks for excellent, fair coverage last night. Unlike Matthews and his venon for Hillary, you are refreshing indeed. Hillary's win also shut the mouth of Gregory and Russert. Maybe they will stop Hillary bashing, become human, and begin vetting Obama. He is "no bee" and all mouth. Enough of his rhetoric. We do not want to wake up with him as the nominee and ask, "What did we do?" "How did this happen?" Start vetting this guy, for people are tired of the media hands off approach.

Something's happening here

Syamala Jonnalagadda — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:08:20 GMT

Will all the pundits shut up now? I demand all of you to resign. Watch and learn like the rest of us. Don’t you guys have to understand journalism is not what you think; it is reporting what you see without bias. Women are silent majority in this campaign. We do not bark like some of you on TV. We vote. We see strength in Hillary, we see intelligence in Hillary and we see poise in Hillary. I do not think guys will understand this. We are here to win. This is a war now without guns. Remember we vote

Something's happening here

Jason, Chicago — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:11:35 GMT

It just goes to show that negative campaigning still works. Kudos to you Mrs. Clinton!

Something's happening here

Wayne Port, Uniontown, PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:12:17 GMT

It is refreshing to have a member of the media finally admitting that the media should report the news, i.e. that which has happened, rather than report predictions of what will happen knowing that predictions will influence the electorate. Maybe it comes from having too many talking heads with too much airtime, all competing for too much limelight. Maybe the sports networks will see the light as well. Good blog

Something's happening here

Frank Stone, Phoenix, Arizona — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:12:57 GMT

Mrs Clinton's dramatic win was indeed a loss for the media. How often have I listened to Chris Matthews find ways to belittle the efforts of Hillary just as he had done with her husband years ago. In a perfect world there would be no warts, but this is not a perfect world, and one must be able to detect the difference between minor warts and major ones. The desire of the press seems to be to create conflict even when there is none, and I think they should report the news and let the voters decide who they feel would best lead the country. Several pundits even wrongly babbled about Mrs. Clinton not having here family with her at the victory speech. Clearly they were missing what I had seen, unless they wanted Bill and Chelsea to be holding her hand while she gave her very upbeat speech.

Something's happening here

LAM, Atlanta, Georgia — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:14:52 GMT

As a loyal NBC watcher, and reader of The Daily Nightly, I appreciate the honesty in this blog...that there is cynicism within the media that creeps intocovering the campaigns...and that all the media got out in front of the voters and declared Obama the victor and Clinton dead. Let's hope that the lesson is not just learned but REMEMBERED...as Brokaw said, maybe now the media will allow the voters the opportunity to do just that...VOTE...and WAIT until the votes are in and then REPORT the actual results...rather than continually trying to predict behavior that essentially is private. I'm an optimist, so I'm hopeful that NBC will lead the way and be somewhat restrained with the opinions, and strong on reporting results.

Something's happening here

Valerie Sperry - Las Vegas, Nevada — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:15:42 GMT

Right on, Brian! Nobody seemed to hit the mark. Now - how about making up for it by admitting McCain won New Hampshire because the people do not understand Mormonism & would never vote for one, and would neither choose a gun-toting Baptist preacher who's against same-sex marriage & abortion.

Something's happening here

Valerie Sperry - Las Vegas, Nevada — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:16:16 GMT

Something's happening here

Rogene G. Stryker, — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:16:56 GMT

I am so happy that you, whom I admire as a premier newsman, came to the party that we have just begun. How resentful I was yesterday morning that the media was telling me what to think and do! The idea that the media was, in effect, disenfranchising 99% of the American voters was making me sick. Perhaps now you all will stand back and report what is happening without so much bias. RGS Albuquerque, NM

Something's happening here

Tomas E. Revollo, Chicago, Illinois — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:18:16 GMT

I have been very confused by the reporting of Hillary's demise right after Iowa. It reminded me when famous boxers are knocked down and the sportscaster reminisces about their illustrious career that now it supposedly is ending. Suddenly, the boxers come back and knock out their opponents. The same sportscasters come back with "they are still true and great champions."
The sad part is that media writers and commentators don't realize that their opinions influence millions of people and when they get it wrong where does a candidate and stateswoman like Senator Clinton go to get her reputation back besides the voters.
It's time that the professional media step back a little bit and let the voters of Nevada, South Carolina etc. see for themselves without the influence of negative or suspicious reporting especially this election year. the voters are excited let them choose.

Something's happening here

Ladd W — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:18:32 GMT

very well said.

Something's happening here

Candace Eardley Little Falls NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:19:21 GMT

Now I know why I love Brian so much. What a beautiful written, honest essay. You touched my heart and opened my eyes. I am grateful that someone seems to honestly see what some know to be true: that the media needs to report facts and not make suppositions! Thank you.

Something's happening here

Ray Porter, Sarasota, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:20:55 GMT

What New Hampshire clearly demonstrates is that election polls mean absolutely nothing. For a candidate like Obama to go from double-digit deficits to dounble-digit victories in polls that flip-flopped during the last few weeks is ludicruous. I doubt even his steadfast supporters gave any faith to these assinine polls.
The fact is that Barack is the candidate of real change, and Hillary is just Billary in disguise, and a return to sexual trysts in the White House, ignorance of foreign policy (meaning ignorance of growing Islamofascism threats), and a daily dose of unreality for the electorate. Get real - Go Obama!

Something's happening here

Mel, Candia NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:20:56 GMT

I am a registered democrat from NH. I was so proud of my state yesterday. We chose to ignore the poles, to look the other way and vote for who we beleived in. Many times, voters get on the band wagon of who is winning in the poles, not in NH. We take politics too seriously. My vote was still voted for Richardson.

Something's happening here

William Drexel, Moorestown, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:21:03 GMT

Brian, the media got it right. If you truly care about what's happening in this country you'd do a story on the discrepancies between machine counted ballots and hand counted ballots. The facts are right in front of the media's face and no one wants to admit it. The people need help!

Something's happening here

Ron Weldy, Bothell, WA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:21:05 GMT

What it is ain't exactly clear.

Maybe the press will just report instead of predict?

Nah...

Something's happening here

Drew Lyle, Mount Airy, North Carolina — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:21:15 GMT

Brian:

You're otherwise a great newsman but the bias that you present towards Obama is so unprofessional. Its fine if you want to vote for him, but you need to leave your personal feelings about how he inspires you and all that mess out of the newscast and out of your work. Its just got no place there.

Thanks!
Drew

Something's happening here

No Snake Oil — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:22:51 GMT

Williams, how much were you paid to pen this unctuously fawning blurb? Sickening, whoring "journalism."

Something's happening here

Thomas Ward, Slidell La — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:23:31 GMT

Hillary is going to get the democratic nomination

Something's happening here

Bill, Richmond, VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:23:33 GMT

Thanks for the context Brian. Very helpful. I'd imagine before the Daily Nightly existed, there would not have been a good forum to share this take on the media's view of the primary.

Something's happening here

Alan, Boca Raton, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:23:48 GMT

Shame on the media....again! Have you learned nothing from your disgraceful, "egg on your face" errors of 2000? Just once, on behalf of the voting public, I ask that you let us decide the candidate without the "benefit" of your repeated polling and projections.

Something's happening here

Ellen Monroe, Detroit, MI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:24:26 GMT

Thank-you for an interesting and informative perspective on the campaign. The media is fairly low on credibility these days (at least in my view). You are still on my very short list of media people I respect.

As I watched the returns last night I was genuinely delighted that everybody was wrong...it made me have a little faith in people again. We still do have control over the election, no matter what the media is telling us.

Something's happening here

Stu Hyvonen, Saginaw, MI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:24:37 GMT

Brian;

Do you agree that the media "spins" far too much in favor of one candidate or another rather than doing its job of reporting?

Something's happening here

Jackie Rawlings Riverside California — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:26:28 GMT

My thoughts now I know who the Executive Producer is and I've read the comments.

Your not responsible for others only yourself. Your interview with Senator Obama let us see the man which most people don't know. We have and will hear more about his position in this run for the President. In a short time we got to see a man as just a man.
As for Hillary and her breakdown. With the attacks coming from all side and even evil attacks what person wouldn't crack. When most of us are hit so many times it's only human. We watch men who are strong and brave break down but we said we admire their humanity. When I watched her I thought of the movie it's a wonderful life. As the actor cried but saw his friends support him. Like Hillary saw she has a great deal of support and that's what's needed when your at a low point. Yes I'm afraid some comments are right about some NBC reporters being out of line. But they have done this for a long time, it's just people now recognize the lack of professionalism and see the bias.

Brian choose your words carefully and keep being honest. You have shown to be one of the best of our time, as some look back at others. Your station will make changes as those who continue to spin/twist/blame your not in control of that. I've watch Charlie Gibson change which was a shock as he was always the straight man but people do change. Now even he has taken to being bias.

We will see change Brian in alot of areas of our country as we work hard to move back to the foundation on which our country was built. Your fair and honest, just keep that quality it's always a proven winner.

Something's happening here

Ellie Hislop, Freeville,NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:26:31 GMT

Yes, I too thought the media thought the vote between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama was over before it ever started, and was very hasty in predicting the winner. The last laugh is on the media.

Something's happening here

O. Kent, Elgin, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:26:35 GMT

Thank you for an honest comment about the media. I was truly disappointed in Matthews and Olbermann who "pretended" to know the results before the results were made known. Comments like "the end of the Clinton dynasty" and etc. They were wrong. They should be ashamed. Thank you for an honest evaluation of your colleagues.

Something's happening here

Vince Kadlubek, Santa Fe, NM — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:27:23 GMT

Beautifully written. Though I am a strong Obama supporter, and 25 years old, I am a larger supporter of the democratic process and that process would have been completely negated had Barack come away with a double-digit win last night. I am still Fired Up and ready for a showdown with the establishment.
By the way, does anyone find it strange that if Hillary wins the nomination and goes on to win the presidency, we will have over 20 consecutive years of either a Bush or a Clinton running our country? Hmm...doesn't sound like democracy to me.

Something's happening here

Johnny Doe — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:27:43 GMT

Hillary Clinton needs to just to come out of the closet already. Ask her about her "girlfriend" in NY.

Something's happening here

Kathy Corey, Boston, MA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:29:03 GMT

I watched the democratic debate on Saturday night and decided to vote for Hillary Clinton. The male candidates and the press ganged up on her and she fought back. I'm glad that the people of NH decided that it was too soon to annoint Barack Obama as the democratic nominee. He is an inspirational speaker...but he hasn't been tested. When the chips are down...will he fight back.

Something's happening here

Gary Simmerly, Cleveland, OH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:29:16 GMT

A well written essay and a reminder that "change" is needed in more places than just Washington. The great people of New England think longer before acting than in some other parts of this country. How can you possibly conclude that the election is over after just two primaries.

Shame on you all. You should return to the days of Walter and Chet and just report the news.

Something's happening here

jane doe central new york state — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:29:18 GMT

thank you Brian for being sensible in this time of idiocy by so many who forget to put their mind in gear before they put their mouth in motion

Something's happening here

Larry Lubicich, New York, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:29:27 GMT

To make the statement that people would embrace any political candidate as they would "embrace loved ones returning from foreign battlefields" is preposterous.

Something's happening here

joseph gaskin, syracuse, ny — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:29:46 GMT

i strongly believe that the two guys who held up signs at a hillary even saying 'iron my shirt' were planted by her campaign. the media should investigate. if these guys are found to have been hillary supporters all along then bill and hillary have played all of us as fools. hillary will be the queen of out-sourcing! she outsourced her duties to monica lewinsky.

Something's happening here

martha, san diego CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:30:35 GMT

The media is guilty of creating marketable soundbites, just as the public is guilty of relying on them. The Iowa caucus was one event, hardly the death knell for *any* campaign. Let the process happen without slicing it up into little boxes made of ticky-tacky (to quote a slightly older song).

Something's happening here

Ralph Rossi, Greensboro, NC. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:30:42 GMT

I think the demographics of the voters in New Hampshire favored Hillary Clinton. I also think she received some sympathy votes after her brief meltdown. As a lifelong Democrat from the North who has lived in the South for 25 years I can say with assurance that Hillary cannot win the election! The voters in the Southern and Western states both men and women will reject her in November especially if the Republican nominee is John McCain. A loss in Iowa, a close call in New Hampshire, these are places where she should have scored big. Outside a few states in the NE the women will not vote for her.

Something's happening here

Sandy Perez, Fairfax VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:31:48 GMT

Hillary Clinton's loss in Iowa was unexpected, but even more surprising was how quick the media was to discount the relevancy of her campaign. They all but declared her candidacy dead after just a single loss, with headlines like "Goodbye Hillary" and "What the Heck Happened with Hillary?" John Edwards played up to this by trying to cast the democratic race as one with just two frontrunners. And Obama delivered a speech that sounded as though he had just won his party's nomination. I'm a registered Republican, but even I agree that the media scrutiny of Clinton was ridiculous. The whole effort to discredit Clinton seemed calculated and even personal at times. I'm glad she won last night. Her victory comes as a slap in the face to her opponents and is a lesson well learned about jumping to conclusions.

Something's happening here

Tony Davis, Dallas , Tx. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:32:45 GMT

This is a very insightful article. I too suspect this will make Barack a better candidate. Now his team will press to the end in every state.

His supporters will be more motivated than ever before to actually come out and make themselves heard as they did in Ia., and apparently didn't do in N.H.

Not to be taken lightly is the fact that women voters didn't want to see a serious female candidate for the presidency written off so early.

The sentiment there is perfectly understandable. I think women have felt - correctly - as though they have not been heard for a long time in this country.

The same is true for minorities as well, and for the traditional working class.

All have a legitimate feeling that they've been left out in many ways, that their voices don't count.

That's why ultimately, i believe Barack will win. 28 years with either a Bush or a Clinton as either VP or President , with so many people voiceless is simply long enough.

Something's happening here

valerie, albany, ny — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:33:04 GMT

Brian,

How true!The media and the polls screwed up.The media screwed up again by believing the polls and reporting them as IF they were correct. Some people change their votes just because the media reports a winner before the polls EVEN OPENED! We can't stand to hear you guys act as if it is a runaway before the voting begins.

Something's happening here

Suzi Robnett, Edmond, OK — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:33:55 GMT

Thank you, Brian, for a well-written and heart-touching commentary. My hat is off to the citizens of New Hampshire, who declared that this race is really just beginning. Thank you, New Hampshire voters, for setting the tenor of things to come by reminding all the candidates of their own humanity. Let this primary mark the spot of meaningful dialogue, statesmanship conduct, and well-considered solutions to the challenges this country faces. Change, without a plan, will get us what we already have.

Something's happening here

Brenda M. Hoskins, Scottsdale, Arizona — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:33:59 GMT

The one story that the media have not given enough coverage of is the simplest arithmetic: The delegate count.

In this representative democracy forum, it doesn't matter what percentages were racked up in an individual state; it doesn't matter the number of persons, nor of the demographics or special interests. What matters is how many delegates accumulate to each candidate.

I hope NBC and MSNBC will get down to the basics of 'gathering those chits.' Only by understanding the delegate count will Americans understand the political conventions spectacles to follow the primaries. BTW: John Edwards is still a candidate.

Something's happening here

Jane Vasquez, Washington, DC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:34:23 GMT

I would be fine with either of them, and in fact am actively hoping for either a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket. But the media needs to take the rose-colored glasses off its coverage of Obama. Seriously. It's the media's fawning that does his candidacy a disservice ... and makes the critiques of Clinton seem even more 'unfair' by comparison. He has no record to speak of, and as thrilling a speaker as he is - he needs to be examined much more critically before the electorate makes a final choice.

Egg on the media's face? You bet. They deserved it. Please learn a lesson from this debacle and start doing your actual jobs.

Something's happening here

Margaret Flint — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:41:52 GMT

What a reward for Hillary that the people of New Hampshire saw through the negative, bloody, out right and dirty way the media treated her. Meathead Chris Matthews dogged has dogged her out for the last few weeks. I remember saying to myself, "Why are they hurting her and being so mean to her?" She has been vindicated. Thanks, Brian for the honest piece that you have written.

Something's happening here

Carolyn Bauer — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:41:55 GMT

I appreciate the integrity that you bring to the news. Also, your humor at the whims of news and the press. We the public are very fickle indeed. Maybe we should go back to reading tea leafs. I am very happy with the results in New Hampshire just for the sheer spice its added to the coverage.

Something's happening here

Mary HH, Decatur, GA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:42:17 GMT

Perhaps the real story here is why were the media and the polls so wrong? You make the case for the media's premature conclusion about Obama based on the "fans" that showed up for him at a campaign stop. Fans don't equal votes and so far in this election season, the media has been caught up in fiction instead of reality. I hope this is wake up call to all the pundits. Don't count out any group of voters. We may like to visit the excitement of celebrity, but it doesn't mean we want to live with it for four or more years. Although some may perceive elections as popularity contests in this country, I believe that most of us, when it truly matters, vote with our heads, not our hearts.

Something's happening here

Jim Clemmer — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:42:28 GMT

I suppose that many of us saw and vaguely understood the extreme ironies of yesterday's New Hampshire primaries, but it is helpful to have Brian Williams set them down in all of their starkness. Some of what happened was probably just a case of severe foot-in-mouth disease among the media; but some of it surely reflected some cosmic metaphysical, ultimately unknowable, principles of American politics.

Something's happening here

Jackie Mason — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:42:46 GMT

Very well said. I am a 48 year old African American woman and has never been so undecided about two candidates in my life. I listen to the media and got very angry with them and decided they were attacking her as a woman and I was most definitely going to vote for her when my time came. I am from the state of Maryland.

Something's happening here

jp concord, ma — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:43:45 GMT

When i step back and look at what just happened in NH maybe the best thing for America is a ticket that has both Hilary and Obama on it. Fervent supporters of each may pale at the idea and i can't say who is the Pres. and who is the VP - the people will say that, but what better synergy of vision, get it done and cross all the divides we cling to is there!?

Something's happening here

Rick, Buffalo, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:44:01 GMT

Are all the Obama lovers in love with the man or the message or the myth. My very real fear is that people are getting caught up in a "movement" without putting much thought into what the movement really is: the elevation of an inexperienced, naive politition that happens to be very eloquent.

Something's happening here

Bill Smeck, Springfield, Pennsylvania — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:44:25 GMT

Most of my life I've run in road races. The news media could learn a few things about races. They tend to 'authoritively' predict a race outcome from the first steps - like predicting a 10,000 meter race in the first 50 meters. And when they find themselves wrong they appear dumbfounded, with all intention of changing their ways about making preditions too early. But that never happens - too bad the public has to endure the rants of such 'experts'. Sometimes less analysis and scrutney is better. We'd all be less stressed....

Something's happening here

Sandy Hood, Aliquippa, PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:44:52 GMT

I do not understand why everyone is so in awe of Barack Obama's speeches. I think he sounds like a Baptist minister not a politician. If I want to hear sermons I will go to church not a political rally.

Something's happening here

M. Pegler, Knoxville, TN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:46:27 GMT

What I loved the most was how wrong ALL the so called "pundits" got it. I predicted Hillary would win and told my Fox News-loving husband that it's a big mistake to try to tell us voters who we were going to vote for. The disparaging way they talked about her cemented her win, I believe. I think we are all tired of the news on both sides acting as if they KNOW something. Clearly, they don't! Good for Brian Williams for admitting it.

Something's happening here

Nancy Aspaturian, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:50:45 GMT

Brian -- Thank you for a really well written, insightful piece. I follow politics and pundits closely and this is the best piece I've read.

Something's happening here

Greg Reamy — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:50:48 GMT

Thank you for accepting the blame for the most inexcusable behavior by the media against Mrs Clinton I've seen in a long, long time. The reason Hillary won is quite clear, people sat and watched, as I did, and were just plan mad as hell at the media and changed their mind. If I, as a male, felt this way, I can only imagine how mad women must have felt. However, the majority of the blame lies with Chris Matthews, while very bright and often entertaining, he has an obvious personal dislike for the Clintons and his deliberate smirks expressed with the airing of each poll result showed it. Of course, like many of the politicans he covers, when he is caught or cornered, like them he tries to shift the blame. This morning he blurts out the ridiculous line that "white people speak with fork tongues" to pollsters. A very disturbing comment to say the least. Chris, take your fork and eat crow and I, as a white person, will reserve the right to makeup or change my mind and not feel obligated to tell a pollster or anyone else about it - especially you.

Something's happening here

Mary Brennan, Fort Washington, MD — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:52:29 GMT

Brilliant analysis of New Hampshire, Brian. You are correct. The pundits should follow the trends rather than try to create them.

Something's happening here

Nancy Daniels Emmett, Idaho — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:54:00 GMT

I enjoyed the personal perspective about New Engand, as a western I enjoyed the descriptions of the people.

Something's happening here

Bonnie, Downingtown, PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:54:23 GMT

For weeks I've wanted to write. I'm stunned at the poor quality of emotional hype news reporting. The reporters are reporting with no balances. Voters are predominantly out in numbers to take back control of our country because of our current President and country's condition! We know Democrats will get us out of Iraq. The youth have as much to loose in this primary as the routine conscientious voters, since it's their physical war. If Obama never happened, they certainly would still be out in numbers. Each candidate has brought in voter's support. I am very dissappointed so many of the news reporters I usually trust have biased their reporting. It makes it more difficult to see through the smoke to get honest answers, but you must think we are blind. Can we please get back to the program of reporting?

Something's happening here

Milton — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:57:04 GMT

Brian, Your love and bias towards the Clintons and now Obama shines bright. You have been used and sucked in by the Hillary "trail of tears." What a joke. This woman is a master of using people but come on, you should be smarter than this.

Something's happening here

FMmagno,New Yok, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:57:10 GMT

HILLARY WEPT

I have played the tv clips when the former First Lady
shed tears when a woman asked her how is doing all along
the campaign. So many pundits decried their cynicisms
abour it. It was a fake; a masterful act to connect to the emotions, to the very hearts of the crowd, the women.

They have been proven wrong. It was a real act. The way I see it, she was so tired, and weakened by the onslaught of poll surveys pointing to the imnminent
death of her candidacy in new Hampshire; a rejection
oh her desire for years to be of service to the people and to the country. If she faked it, it is like, saying, that an act of aborting the pregnancy, is between the mother and of her God.It is only between
Hillary and her God. Whatever it is, the people have spoken. So be it.

Something's happening here

Mike Wash dc — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:57:14 GMT

This is not a Obama kiss ass peice by any means. Way to go their BW you lost all respect.

Something's happening here

Greg Taylor — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:57:52 GMT

I think the reason the polls were wrong was actually because of the effects polls have. Independents thought Obama had it in the bag and that it was safe to vote for McCain so he would beat Romney -- and that hurt Obama, especially against a wave of women voters wanting to defend Hillary from being "picked on."

Basically, it all just goes to support the idea that it is ridiculous to tie something as important as the presidency to one New England state that is traditionally so out of step with the rest of the county.

Something's happening here

Rolland Marshall Tamaqua, PA. 18252 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:58:49 GMT

This just proves that the news media, just pick their favorite candidate. and the people are not stupit to follow their advice. The media does not know about the real things that are wrong in this country. They are controled by their bosses and are told what to report.They don't show how people are suffering from,not having health care and enough money to live on.

Something's happening here

Gloria Rouse, Bentonville, AR — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:58:49 GMT

All the pundits got it wrong! Yet even today, they refuse to admit that they were giddy with delight at what they perceived as the downfall of the Clinton's. This has been handled unfairly from beginning to end and it won't end with last night's results. Matthews and Scarborrow were yakking it up this maorning making absurd statements that Hillary Clinton would have never become a senator had the country not felt "sorry" for her, conveniently omitting that she's been reelected with support from all parts of the state of NY and has been an outstanding Senator.
They will continue in this vein - not because of what she has or has not done, but because they want to tell us who we can vote for and it isn't Hillary Clinton.

Something's happening here

Delores Kennedy, Murfreesboro, Tennessee — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:04 GMT

Great article. The media is brutal to Hillary and I watched faces drop last night as Hillary appeared on the winner's board as the leader. Matthews, Fineman, Scarborough etc. had her political obit ready and could not wait to deliver it. Thank you New Hampshire voters for proving those pundits wrong and I hope they choke on the crow they are eating. I am a loyal NBC news and MSNBC news watcher. I will continue to be. I am a political junkie and I say to Hillary "YOU GO GIRL!!!!" Is the West Virginia primary February 5th? I thought it was in May. Laughing at McCain's speech was so terribly RUDE. Shane on those that did it.

Something's happening here

E.C. Mueller, Tigard, Oregon — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:28 GMT

Great observations, analysis and comments Brian. Please keep columns like this coming. This election is launching a new era and has a different feel. Not just because of an African American and a woman candidates but because of interest and engagement from the voters. Could 2008 see the highest voter turnout since the 60.8% in 1968? I guess that would be fitting with Brian's reference to "Something's happening here." The months leading up to November will be facinating.

Something's happening here

Diane — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:59:48 GMT

Brian seems to be missing the point of why voters may have turned off to Obama. That soaring speech he gave is becoming a trademark but what is he really saying? Let's change, we can win, yes we can?" Come on. These are empty slogans written not by Obama, but by speechwriters. I think he is becoming a caricature and a phony. It reminds me of Republications in 2004 who shouted "family values" at every stop. His words are beginning to ring hollow and it's time he focused on real people and real problems and leave the soaring oratory behind.

Something's happening here

r road — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:00:16 GMT

"It should be noted that virtually everyone got it wrong."
....that sounds so much like the Bush defense for the invasion of Iraq.
And you wonder why we don't believe much you tell us.
Lemmings come to mind.

Something's happening here

Running out of Hope, Newport News,Va. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:00:19 GMT

Look, Hillary Clinton in the white house could for all intended purposes be even worse than George W. Bush. No really, think about it for a moment. What did it take to pull out a razor thin (40% to 40%) win against the best thing to happen to this country sense Washington? Will Hillary have to work up a cry every time she finds herself behind from now on. Will Bill continue his tragic character assassination of a candidate who in this God forsaken process has the integrity long sense disappeared from American politics? Barack Obama will eventually win the nomination because if he dosen't America won't survive itself. Closet racist will like in New Hampshire say one thing and do another painting this countries political process no more then imagery of hopes gone by. Women against men in a way that will make the faminist movement of the early 70's seem like girls playing hop-scotch in the school playground. The republican political base will draw a line in the sand. (They're not going to give the Clintons the benefit of a doubt. Too much bad blood and too much swollen to pride to heal.) It would indeed be too bad for this country if she were to win. Sure I believe she's a good person who has much to offer. But she's not the one right now. Since 1972 think about what's happened and who has been there in the middle of it all and then search your soul. You'll see it as clear as day what is needed and who is needed to make what needs to happen happen. Obama is that person. Like he said in concession, they all have good ideas and they all are patriots. It takes a leader to not only recognize that about others, but it takes a leader to say it and embrace it openly. Or is that a fairy tale too?

Something's happening here

Scott Taylor Chandler — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:00:33 GMT

Ths country is upset at Pres. Bush and understandably so.... And what I feel is they want a change. The problem is the change they want is not helpful to the country. Do we want to elect someone who will be like Jimmy Carter? After an un popular war in Iraq, just like Vietnam was unpopular and so the people went with Jimmy Carter, he was the alternative to a unpopular President and war....

Then it was Morning in America again. I believe that trend is back again and the country needs another Jimmy Carter to screw up the economy and another Ronald Reagan to rebound it with smart fiscal policies and a boost to the economy.

Only this time around, the Country's Jimmy Carter will be Obama or Clinton. And the Country's Reagan will be Mitt Romney.

I believe the United States would be better off with Romney, but I think I might have to wait another 4 years.

Scott Taylor
Chandler, Arizona

Something's happening here

LCK in Arkansas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:04:13 GMT

Thank you for an excellent political observation of what happened yesterday in New Hampshire. The political pundits were so eager to declare Obama the nominee, they forgot that the only forecasting in news should be the weather, and it is wrong half the time.

Something's happening here

bill f new suffolk ny — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:04:51 GMT

please now tell us which pundits heads roll. let's see if you can get that right!!

Something's happening here

Nan Gallagher, Geneva, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:04:53 GMT

All I can say is already I am disappointed in the journalistic side of things. Waking up yesterday morning everyone, every channel, had Hillary dead and buried. I can see how some people get swayed by the reporting. What I'd like to know is .. how foolish did Fox News feel, how foolish did MSNBC feel, etc, etc .. you put the horse before the cart this time and it's discouraging to us in the "fair and balanced" audience! Yes, Obama is positive and moves people with his speeches, etc, but don't throw Mrs. Clinton from the bus just yet. I'm not sure who I will vote for at this point but I do know I don't want TV news trying to influence it!

Something's happening here

Charles, Oklahoma — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:05:03 GMT

Please investigate now the reports of election irregularities and fraud. That is the big story.

Something's happening here

Andrew Kearl, Brooklyn, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:05:28 GMT

This is an incredible article and it makes me feel better after a devestating night last night. The media may have even played in a role in Obama's defeat by writing Clinton's obituary in the press, but it's refreshing to see an honest portrayal of the media's perceptions in a very personal way. I am still supporting Obama for the nomination because something is happening in this country. I am happy Hillary Clinton finally discovered how to be a human being for a day, but there are some candidates who have been human all along.

Something's happening here

Cris South — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:05:57 GMT

Hear, hear. Hopefully our news professionals will allow the democratic process to go foward without them trying to make the history for us. It's very disturbing to hear commentators declare someone defeated before the votes are even cat. I applaud Chris Matthews' comment last night when he said, "I will never, ever under-estimate Hillary Clinton again." This is a political event of epic proportions and it deserves to play out exactly like the American people want it, not the media. Cover it; don't call it. Thank you.

Something's happening here

Cindy, Eau Claire, WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:06:21 GMT

Kudos for the people of New Hampshire for making up their own minds. And unfortunately you are correct, and it will happen again.

Tell TR to keep his white board handy!

Something's happening here

Denis Plante, Scottsdale, AZ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:07:11 GMT

As a former NH resident, (48 years) I can tell you that NH folks will not let the media tell them how to vote. Tom Brokaw got it right in his comments last night after Cliton was named the winner. The media should be ashamed on the bad job they did to the American people and the people of NH.

Something's happening here

Cindy Freund, Lake Forest, Illinois — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:07:53 GMT

I totally agree with Brian. The news media were awful beyond belief to Hillary. I watched CNN and they were awful, so I changed the channel to MSNBC and they were just as awful. I thought, "why are they doing this?" I am an Obama supporter. I'm from Illinois and I voted for him for Senator, he's a great and wonderful guy. But after yesterday, watching the media just trash Hillary, I said to myself, "this is it, I'm behind Hillary." She is trying so hard, and no one seems to want to give her a break."

Something's happening here

Rick, Visalia Ca — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:08:18 GMT

New Hamshire is a small state with a little over a million people and everyone is acting as if the race is over! Ridiculous.

Something's happening here

Dan Clem, Boston, MA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:08:57 GMT

Brian,
It's nice that you and some of your colleagues have realized how inaccurate and worthless your predictions and mutating election narratives actually are. Now, please put that realization into action. Stop reporting only on the human drama angles and the Drudge-type nonsense; start giving us real information on the candidates and the issues. Check facts! Don't be afraid to say that a candidate is being misleading or dishonest! Be tough, but do so to get substance out of these people instead of just "gotcha" gaffes. This is important. We all understand that there is a powerful bottom line that all major media must pay attention to, but seriously, do you think you're going to have jobs if you continue to practice Entertainment Tonight-style journalism? It's no wonder that the blogosphere and The Daily Show are now viewed by many as the more reliable sources of reality-based information. You guys are too caught up in the horse-race b.s. and some of you (Matthews) are too caught up in affecting the news rather than reporting it. While I am a big fan of Obama, it is disheartening to see so many so-called journalists openly championing his candidacy and openly disdaining that of Hillary Clinton. I think there is some truth to the theory that Matthews' aggression against Hillary compelled many NH voters to back "their girl" in her time of need.
That stinks.

Something's happening here

Art Hunter, Minneapolis, MN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:08:56 GMT

Right on the money, Brian.

Also, a reply that I provided in another blog is as below, since it is relevant to this blog too.

I think what I would want Obama to do, would be to put together a detailed plan for change that he is talking about and his plans to SUCCESSFULLY execute it.

If I am part of the media, I would examine his past track record in driving change through, under difficult circumstances (assuming such events even took place), because believe me, if he plans to execute all the talk we have heard till date, he will be going against gargantuan, entrenched titans. Prior track record is a solid indicator of future ability to succeed. I have not heard of a SINGLE event where Obama went against huge entrenched interests and succeeded in changing the status quo, after facing insurmountable odds. I don't see the media as having examined Obama with any degree of sustained scrutiny, either.

Without the above, all I hear are a lot of words and "inspiring talk" from Obama and "energising" impressionable youth, which by itself is a good thing. But, bottomline, TALK is cheap without solid past record of SUCCESSFUL ACTION to back up the talk.

I don't want to determine the president of the USA, based on talk alone. Till date, the media has totally failed the citizens of the USA, when it comes to Obama and that is a fact. There is a lot at stake here and we are past the joking phase.

Something's happening here

Bill, Asheville, NC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:09:10 GMT

Wow -- thank you, Brian Williams. This is why I watch NBC more than ABC or CBS. It is rare the media will actually stand up and admit they blew it.

Something's happening here

Charles Parker, Henderson, NV — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:10:06 GMT

Amen.

As a voting Democrat for 45 years, up until last evening I was trying to decide whether to participate in the Nevada caucus less than two weeks away.

I wanted to participate in the caucus so I made sure I voted against Senator Obama -- mainly because as a Democrat I didn't want to support (by default) someone whose real record and potential for leading the country I knew little about (like all the Republicans blindly did when Bush faced Gore.) But I didn't know whom to vote for.

Now I know Hillary can hold her own when the going gets nasty among Democrats this next few months, and I am sure she'll overcome her eventual Republican challenger. So I'm not undecided any longer.

Something's happening here

Craig Della Penna, Portland, OR — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:10:29 GMT

Nicely said, but not sufficient - you only barely mentioned the press corps responsibility in this. I think the 24/7, non-stop, venomous, Hilary hating bloodfest that was displayed all over the national news media was, in large part, responsible for the turnaround.
People like me were sickened by the atrocious, disgusting behavior of so-called journalists as they pushed each other out of the way to dance on her political grave.
You all need to do a serious gut check and leave your biases at the door or risk losing what little credibility you have left.

Something's happening here

Kate, Chicago, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:10:39 GMT

Even though Hillary won in NH, I'm still fired up for Barack Obama. He is the real agent for change. He's positive and invites you into the process. I think America is sick of not knowing what's going on and having zero in common with the policy makers in Washington. Hillary is old school politics - we have a pattern going with our presidents...Bush, Clinton, Bush...there's no way I want the pattern to continue!! It's time for something new in America! Barack got his hands dirty with the folks in Chicago to make a real difference when he had the chance to make money and be powerful elsewhere. He's a different kind of person who makes choices to help lift people up. With two little girls he has every motivation in the world to make tomorrow better than today. One person can't do it all...and Obama gets that. It's up to ALL OF US to make change and I want a President who will include me.

Something's happening here

Kate, Chicago, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:10:57 GMT

Something's happening here

Chris Dale — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:11:00 GMT

Brian,

Love your newscasts, but maybe sometime you and Russert could explain why NBC feels the need to "call" elections when 11% of the votes have been tallied? Thx.

Something's happening here

Marianne Milton, Yarmouth, MA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:11:56 GMT

thank you, Brian Williams, for being among the first to admit that you got it wrong... and I believe that the media is still getting it wrong in their interpretation of why it happened...it didn't happen because Senator Clinton got "emotional" in a diner...it happened because the people of NH recognized that she was the most competent, most informed, most qualified of the contestants.........

Something's happening here

Matthew, Minneapolis, MN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:12:00 GMT

I'm not sure that losing in New Hampshire will actually make Sen. Obama a better candidate. It may refine his message, but doesn't address his key flaws.

We live in a nation of color, especially when it comes to politics. Tim Russert singly-handedly coined the phrases Red and Blue states. Yellow-dog democrats. It is sad but true to say that Mr. Obama is the wrong color. Its not that he's too black -- he's too green. He's too inexperienced to win a general election.

For all of his comparisons to JFK, Mr. Obama did not have 14 years in Congress under his belt, nor was he a war hero.

Could you imagine an Obama-McCain election? Sen. McCain will trounce Sen. Obama on experience and national security. The realism of fear always trumps the poetry of hope. Look at how the Republicans swiftboated Kerry. They'll do worse to a man who has no military background and has openly admitted to hard drug use.

If the rest of the Democratic party is half as smart as those party goers in New Hampshire, Sen. Clinton or Sen. Edwards will get the nomination.

Something's happening here

Marcy Dopman — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:12:29 GMT

The MSM needs to REPORT the news and events. They have decided things now and in the last 15 years then they portray them as fact. "Hillary Clinton is done for",is but one example. The MSM prognosticating tends to often be self fulfilling and they think they have it all figured out. Get over yourselves!

Something's happening here

David Eubanks, Dallas, Texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:13:10 GMT

Brian this is why I never miss your broadcast on Nightly News!! What a great piece of journalistic writing! I can feel the emotion and the spririt with which you wrote it!! Thanks for a great message! We are all living such terrific political history at this time in our great country.

Something's happening here

MJ Elliott, Flyover State — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:13:21 GMT

I could not believe it last night at 5:00 p.m when everyone on MSNBC said Hilliary was over -- stop the election; it was over! 1 caucus, an open one at that, and the election was over? Thank goodness all those "brilliant" pundits were wrong and the process goes on for another day. Chris Matthews, Nora O'Donnel, Keith Obermann and others were downright rude to some of their guests and to the politicians. Tom Brokaw was the voice of reason -- it is not over until the voters (not Chris Matthews) says it is over. I loved the fact that my instincts, and not the polls, were right. The election, today, is not over.

Something's happening here

Cymric, Winter Park, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:14:20 GMT

So people are caught up in the feel-good hype surrounding Obama. News Flash to NBC News and all political pundits - Obama is NOT the second coming of the Messiah. The hordes of people who swarm Obama are people who want a taste at the feel good buffet being offered up - hope is powerful medicine - but practicality, level-headedness, and nose-to-the-grindstone is what achieves results. Without those, hope is nothing more than empty promises left unmet. So to the political pundits who believe they know all, try shutting up and listening for a change. try asking questions that truly resonate with the reality of your typical American voter - start asking the candidates the really hard questions and then making sure those questions are answered honestly and factually. if you can't do that, then just shut up.

Something's happening here

Steve Murley San Diego, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:14:27 GMT

I really enjoyed reading this. It really captured the atmosphere of the tumultuous events in New Hampshire over the last 48 hours. Such excellent descriptive writing made me feel like I had been there myself.

Something's happening here

Jo Braden, Davidson, NC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:15:09 GMT

In this article, Brian Williams showed an intelligence and insight that very few journalists in today's media possess. The media should report, not create or shape the news. The media was humbled yesterday, but I agree with Brian that, unfortunately, it will soon be forgotten and they will be back to the status quo.

Something's happening here

John L Mencias — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:15:52 GMT

I am from a land that may be considered faraway from American politics - Belize (Central America); but I have been following American politics very closely, ever since George W. Bush was "selected" President of the US back in 2000. I was disappointed with the results from New Hampshire last night: I wanted Barack Obama to win. Brian Williams' explanation of what happened seems to make much sense. But I am a bit more cynical. If Hillary Clinton will break down each time the pollsters show her losing, then I will have an even bigger problem with her candidacy. If you need people to feel sorry for you in order to get ahead, then you are no fair competitor and no true leader. It is personal for her indeed - she said so herself: She is in it to win (for herself). An Obama win is a win for all of us who believe that "Yes We Can".

Something's happening here

Ken McClusky Fredericksburg, VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:16:11 GMT

Really nice and insightful. These references to race are sad and unlike Obama. I certainly hope this is not his excuse for a loss to a more experienced and capable female opponent. She is a good politician; He's a good candidate. There is a difference and experience has a lot to do with it.

Something's happening here

Larry Brown, Birmingham, Al. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:16:27 GMT

I would say that the biggest loser of all the big losers in this, has been Chris Matthews. Matthews has demonized Hillary Clinton beyond anything I ever expected from him, and he's paying for it now. I wasn't even a Hillary supporter, and I'm not sure that I am even after this. What I am sure of is that Matthews can't stand Mrs. Clinton and has gone out of his way to paint her in the most negative way possible. On his Sunday show, he once had a picture of her with the caption "she devil" under the picture, and then later in the same broadcast showed a picture of her with horns coming out of her head. He then blamed Republicans for it. Matthews and the rest of the media decided early on that experienced people like Joe Biden would get no coverage at all, and that the only people that would be viable would be Clinton and Obama. Edwards was just too pesky to go away quietly. The most experienced candidates would be dismissed because they weren't glamorous enough or not controversial enough. Apparetly the voters in New Hampshire don't like having the media tell them who to vote for.

Something's happening here

Robert P. Toleno, Sprakers, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:16:56 GMT

News reporting not withstanding, to 'get it right' isn't always posible when dealing with the minds and souls of voting Americans. To often the press and even the candidates forget that Americans have minds of their own and know how to use them to choose who they think is the best candidate.

Something's happening here

jj — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:17:16 GMT

My mother much smarter than Hillary Clinton-and BILL LIGHWEIGHT. . .

Something's happening here

Gail, Chapel Hill, NC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:17:27 GMT

It looks like those NH people voted out of a piece of history and sympathy. No wonder, people said women tears are priceless. Have they forgotten what is good to the country? I am a woman myself. Gender and color and age and whatever are not issues to me, I vote for the one who is to thine be true to the country. If she dces not have a Clinton extension, will she even be elected as a Senator and be a presidential candidate? So as a woman and a former lady, do those labels have already defined how "experience" she is? I think she needs to use Visine everyday to get some more tears.

Something's happening here

Kathy, Brooklyn, CT — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:17:35 GMT

Well said. One of the things I think that the American people would like changed is the arrogance of the media. Thank you for owning up to the mistakes made. I hope you will lead the way to more responsible reporting of the campaign. And thank you to the people of New Hampshire for voting their minds and not bowing to media influence.

Something's happening here

lou north carolina — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:18:31 GMT

never under estimate the power of a woman---yeah for Hillary

Something's happening here

The real comeback kid — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:18:34 GMT

So she lost control of her emotions...does that mean when she has her finger hovering over the launch button she will not lose it again?

Something's happening here

ladytechie — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:18:44 GMT

Brian, I was amused last night at your quip about analog retail politics, and I note that you used the phrase in part here. Could we have a blog entry that explains more of what you mean by "retail politics" I think I get it but I'm not sure. Somehow I think it may be the best way to explain this very interesting election season.

Something's happening here

Maggie Yandow, Rochester, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:19:05 GMT

Brian, You are brilliant.... couldn't have been documnted better... thank you for summing it all up for us.... I think that this should be saved and re-read over the next several months.... how lucky we are to be Americans and to have the freedom to make our own decisions....

Something's happening here

M.Y. Syracuse, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:19:19 GMT

Hopefully people do not place much value in media predictions of election results in deciding if they should bother to vote. This predictions are a disservice to the democratic process. Hats off to the people of New Hampshire for defying the media and the pollsters! The PEOPLE have spoken!

Something's happening here

Alex K, San Francisco, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:19:24 GMT

Despite who you support, you have got to love the fact that this country's leaders are chosen by us, the voters...not the media and not the pollsters.
John McCain is a man of dignity and Hillary Clinton, although cold and calculating at times, is a smart, can-do woman who can be a great president.
Congrats to both of them.

Something's happening here

Linda Moore, Boston — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:19:52 GMT

Amen.

Something's happening here

Celia, Houston, Texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:19:52 GMT

Well said!
The media must stop thinking and speaking for the American people. I have never been a fan of Hillary Clinton, until now and I am so happy she won.
Way to go Hillary. You did it and you exposed these idiots for who they are. Bravo to those people of New Hamphire who refused to let the media decide for them. NOW we are talking about CHANGE!!!!!!!

Something's happening here

Peter, Washington, DC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:21:04 GMT

Brian, You've never been more eloquent or insightful. I'm glad I stayed the course, though that phrase has been somewhat tarnished.

Something's happening here

Jerry Eaton — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:21:18 GMT

Tell me why Barack's campaign collasped? This isn't just about what Hillary did right to win, how did a two digit lead vanish overnight what doesn't he have that voters recognized at the last minute?

Something's happening here

Jack Johnson — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:21:43 GMT

Brian Williams!?What planet do you come from?

Something's happening here

Wayne, Kansas City, MO — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:22:10 GMT

Kudos to Brian Williams on this GREAT analysis! There's another vote going on behind the scenes in this election year. It's the vote for who we trust most not to lead the free world, but to report on it. Right now NBC looks like the clear frontrunner to me, with fine reporting and analysis from Brian Williams, the ever wise and engaging Tim Russert, and a host of others.

I admit, I had been watching one of those other networks, but while NBC continues to grow, the others continue to dumb it down. Sure, they all got caught off guard by Hillary's stunning comeback, but NBC got it right when the dust settled.

Most importantly, America must vote for who THEY think is the best candidate, not who Brian or Katie or Charlie or anybody else tells us is the winner before the votes are cast.

John Edwards had the most important point of the three top candidates in his speech last night: 99% of the country has not spoken yet. May the events of Tuesday night cause everyone to pause and realize that their vote DOES count! Iowa and New Hampshire are done, but there are still THOUSANDS of delegates left to be selected.

"Vote" for your network, but more importantly VOTE for your candidate!

Something's happening here

D.F. Cleveland, Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:22:21 GMT

People here in the midwest are scratching their heads at the media's love fest with a candidate named Barack Hussien Obama. It's just not going to happen people...we're not electing an American president with what sounds to us like the name of a terrorist. It's not because he's black...I'd vote for Colin Powell in a heartbeat. It's not because he's young - I'm tired of these old politicians who have no excuse for not making change and a difference sooner. If there was no republican on the ballot...even I'd vote for Hillary and that is rediculous to me!

Something's happening here

Fuwei — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:22:31 GMT

Here are the facts as I see them, the media continues to put their own spin on the political process, but who is responsible for the mis-information??
"SOME MORON WHO HOPES THAT THE GULLABLE AMERICAN UNINFORMED PUBLIC ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THE INSANITY OF THEIR POSITION ON THEIR PERSONAL FAVORITE CANDIDATE. POINT OF FACT!! THE DECLARATION THAT GORE WON THE MAJORITY VOTE 4 YEARS AGO. STICK TO TRUTH AND STOP THE BULLSHIT!!!

Something's happening here

Jamie Miller Atlanta GA 30309 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:22:36 GMT

The undecided electorate, and particularly women, responded to the media's portrayal of Hillary Clinton in the days between Iowa and NH. The characterization that Hilary's moment of emotion was staged was particularly infuriating to many women, including myself. While infuriating, it also motivated. Following the weekend of Hillary pounding, my 78 year old mother who had just moved to Georgia got up on Monday to make certain that her voter regisration was filed so she could vote in February -- for Hillary! The message is that the political commentators should allow the candidates' message to be heard and not try to control what the voters hear and think. Chris Matthews is a perfect example. Though I watch his show regularly, his recent treatment of Elizabeth Edwards was a perfect example of his attempt to prevent the real message to the voters from being heard. He focused entirely on the trial attorneys support of Edwards. It was obvious that he did not believe that Edwards was a serious candidate and though Edwards got air-time, there was no serious discussion as to issues. Hillary owes a lot to Matthews and his media co-horts for her recent victory because they ignited the voter who fueled her victory.

Something's happening here

L. topps — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:22:44 GMT

I think it is pretty sad for America if we vote for a candidate because they cry on cue. We are the stongest country in the world and this is an embarrassment.

Something's happening here

Fuwei — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:22:52 GMT

Something's happening here

Fuwei — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:23:10 GMT

Something's happening here

Fuwei — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:23:11 GMT

Something's happening here

Fuwei — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:23:11 GMT

Something's happening here

Fuwei — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:23:18 GMT

Something's happening here

Sal Cisneros — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:24:00 GMT

Tom Brokaw in effect chastised the media and his own colleagues last night after as the returns clearly suggested Hillary would win. I am a life long democrat, support John Edwards and watch NBC and MSNBC becuase I usually find you to be objective and balanced. Your coverage of John McCains victory speech and the handling of the forgone loss by Clinton was embarassing at best. I will never go to FOX, but dont force me to go to CNN. NBC has a moral compass in Brokow, you will lose viewers if you dont "change" and follow his advise. What teased me to read this article was the line " the biggest loser, the media". Yet little of this was covered here. The biggest loser may have been NBC and the winner, CNN.

Something's happening here

Fuwei — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:24:09 GMT

Something's happening here

Jo Ellen Navarro — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:24:22 GMT

I am so very proud of Hillary Clinton for the campaign she had in New Hampshire. She is real and she is who I am voting for. Please remember that California has yet to vote. We still count, don't we? Please to the Press and Media, and isn't Chris Matthews supposed to be non biased, don't call the election until WE all get the chance to mark down our candidate for office. Thank you. We have just begun changing this United States.

Something's happening here

Scott Hardy, Scarborough, Maine — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:25:07 GMT

I think that the results last night in NH will only serve to strengthen the democratic party. I believe that there is now a mutual respect between the Obama and Hillary camps, and a feeling that there is a wave of support, a wave of support to unseat Bush and to stop anyone who would possibly continue down the Bush path. So whether Hillary or Obama are elected (or anyone else from the dem party), it will be for the right reasons, and there will be a clear mandate for change. The people will have spoken.

Something's happening here

Shoaib Qadri, New York, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:25:46 GMT

People keep saying Obama is here for change...but I have to ask..in what way? Is that why he voted to re-authorize the Patriot Act? Clinton isn't any different. Today I overheard two women on my way to work on the subway(I live in New York City), and they were talking about how they'd vote for Hilary because "She looks and feels like she might do a good job." I mean come on, we have to vote based on the candidate's POLICY and RECORD. Personally I think Ron Paul is the only candidate who actually wants change(and specifically mentions what changes he'll make unlike Obama/Clinton) in our government - more people need to listen to what he's saying.

Something's happening here

Edwin G — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:25:58 GMT

Where is Mr. Martinez who wrote an article here who published an anonymous writer asking Hillary to withdraw after caucus in Iowa and day befor NH primary. Since when did we determine our candidate by the result of two small states. Don't discount the mega states: California, New York, Illinois, Texas, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan and Florida. Once these states have cast their ballots then you can make a sound projection. However, whatever hopes encountered, don't discount the inventor of Hope in Arkansas. This is the comeback kid could not be beaten by Republicans because he feels the people's pain, could not be impeached by the mean Republicans eventhough he is a sensual, he was a doer. This has resonated to his wife who absorbed all the blame since she married Bill Clinton. Analyze Hillary not the way she abandon her husband but how she raised a beautiful daughter, maintained her status as Senator of a large state the comeback girl who will break the glass ceiling. Don't paint Hillary as a mere status quo, she is the catalyst that this nation needs. Chelsea is the model of all the youth in America, if not the world.

From hereon, this will be a horse race, not to be decided by independents alone but the die hard democrats who are angry and waiting for this oppotunity to get back at "W". The real enemy is not Obama or Edwards but those Neocons who brought down this country to the abyss. Democrats will be in the trenches on whoever will be the standard bearer ready to match mud for mud and dirt for dirt on whatever Republicans starategists will throw from Carl Rove, Rush and O'Reilly.

The journey of the Clintons are not complete. Democrats are still waiting for the apology from Bill from what he caused to his family, his party and this nation that catapulted an unqualified President in to office. We paid a price of deaths of so many, the export of jobs, the falling dollar, bankcruptcy of so many households. Secondly, she needs the Gores to hitch the bandwagon. This will solidify the democrats. Obama & Edwards, Richardson, Dennis congratulations to your good fighting spirit but you will have your time in the future.

Condolence to FoxNew and MSNBC stay neutral, good you have Matthews and Russert, you will hear more the long lines of the downtrodden Democrats who are now homeless, penniless and hopeless.

Something's happening here

Julie, Long Island, Ny — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:26:06 GMT

Yes. Williams is correct and the press (in particular the likes of Matthews and Olbermann) should be ashamed for trying to deny the public its right to uncompromised opinion, in favor of their own self-aggrandizement. Stop calling elections before the public has had a chance to absorb the implications of each individual decision. This is only the primaries. What's going to happen in November?

Something's happening here

Shoaib Qadri, New York, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:26:29 GMT

Something's happening here

TS, Pittsburgh, PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:26:32 GMT

Why is noone mentioning the reason, I believe, Obama did not win: John McCain.

Something's happening here

Curt, Chicago — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:26:37 GMT

Reminds me of another time when the press didn't get it right, but on a national level: 1948: Dewey Beats Truman

Something's happening here

Kevin Coogan, Wilmington, Delaware — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:26:41 GMT

There was incredible cynicism and smugness from the NBC/MSNBC media pool regarding many of the candidates displayed throughout the evening in your coverage of the New Hampshire primary. I was really troubled in particular by the smirking laughter in response to McCain's victory speech by your panel of experts on MSNBC last night. He won the election against all odds with a margin greater than any of your pundits called...that was the story. He gave what was obviously not the Obama speech that your panel continues to drool over after his Iowa victory. I was not aware that McCain had a reputation of rhetoric splendor nor does he make claims to be great orator. His strengths are his own just as Obama are his which all makes for an interesting, compelling and complicated story. The guffaws and jokes made by your panel at McCain truly demeaned the outcome and the process itself. The expert panel who said that John McCain blew it by giving that particular speech need to question how much their personal biases are affecting the view of reality they present. Obama's speech last week was incredible and he is exciting to follow but his Iowa victory speech was not the whole story... it did not translate into the double digit victory predicted by your experts. Spare the hyperbole and report what is known not what is hoped for by your experts. Say McCain isn't known for being a great speaker acknowledge his victory then move on. Your credibility continues to sink, the humor was sophomoric and the giddiness doesn't belong in a news report even during the opinion section.

Something's happening here

Julie, Long Island, Ny — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:26:50 GMT

Something's happening here

Bill Camarda — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:27:40 GMT

Your thoughtful comments are a welcome counterpoint to the way Chris Matthews stank up the airwaves last night. I wondered how many hours it would take for Matthews, Fineman, et al, to actually notice that the numbers that were rolling below them (and the results of their exit polls) completely contradicted everything they were telling us.

I am not a supporter of Hillary Clinton's: she was my eighth choice in the original Democratic field. But the way she has been treated by the media is nothing short of a disgrace. Too many of you have acted like the worst middle school cliques. You didn't even treat the woman decently when she brought you coffee and doughnuts!

I hope your colleagues will learn something from the experience. But I fear you have that correct, too: "Give us a few weeks — we will promptly forget the lessons of this debacle..." How, exactly, do we get reporters who will actually learn lessons from their debacles?

Something's happening here

Ben Zoutendijk, Orlando, Fla — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:27:45 GMT

Last night, Chris Matthews looked like he had his last supper - a large plate of crow for this political assassin.

Something's happening here

Steve Loehner, New York, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:27:56 GMT

I am a former Democrat, now an independent and was never a big fan of Hilary Clinton. The press coverage of Hilary Clinton has been the most brutal, unfair and meanspirited I have ever seen. Just ask her biggest fan, Pat Buchanan. Hilary Clinton has serious credentials to be President. She as entitled to claim herself a "change" candidate as anyone. Obama, Edwards, and Clinton are all Senators or former ones. All are Washington insiders to one degree or another. I say a woman president qualifies her as a valid change candidate. Like many, I love Barack Obama too. However,we need a skilled battle tested person in the Whitehouse this time around to straighten out the collosal mess created by our current president. For me, its a choice between Clinton and McCain. Sorry, but Obama is just too young and too inexperienced to get my vote at this time. I'm glad the media is eating crow right right now.

Something's happening here

Tony Davis, Dallas , Tx. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:28:24 GMT

I would like to zero in on a couple of statements Brian made in this article:
1) The victory amongst women by Hilary and 2) "The Bradley effect" - How voters have expressed a level of support for African American candidates, but apparently voted differently in reality.

Following that i want to propose some new hypotheses about what happened, and where we are at this point.

We have 2 solid data points to look at, the results in Iowa, and the New Hampshire results.

In Iowa, women went for Obama, but particularly younger women. Also there,and in New Hampshire Males went for Obama. If there was a Bradley effect it would seem it would have happened across gender lines. That wasn't the case. In fact male democrats supported Obama in about the poll predicted amounts.

New Hampshire was the result of pollsters getting it wrong with females there. My hypotheses about this are 3: 1) Women voters really did change their minds at the last moment primarily because they felt a kinship with Hilary in that women are frequently written off. They didn't want that to be true for a seriously viable female candidate for President.
2) Younger voters of all genders didn't turn out. This has been a typical problem in elections, and it is the reason young people often are not heard in our system. They have historically not shown up. That seems to be true here again. 3) The Obama campaign will be seriously challenged to get younger voters to actually do something, but that will be what defines whether Hilary or Barack ends up as the Democratic nominee in the end.

Something's happening here

Fassil Fenikile San Francisco — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:28:35 GMT

Clearly, the results of NH prove that the Clintons are no pushovers by any stretch of anybody's imagination...but no mistake about it: The Obama Phenomenon may very well be just starting out.
TO: Brian Williams - excellent analysis and reporting as usual. Well balanced...Thank you

Something's happening here

Don, New York, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:28:49 GMT

I'm a New Yorker. I wonder my beloved state finally has any relevance in this year's presidential election.

Something's happening here

BARBARA P, YONKERS NEW YORK — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:29:59 GMT

YES INDEED THEY BLOODIED HILLARY. WHEN IN HISTORY
IN ANY OTHER PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE DID THE FOREMAN
TELL A CANDIATE THAT THE "PEOPLE" JUST DON'T LIKE YOU???? THIS IS INCREDIBLE TO ME THAT NO ONE MENTIONS THIS. WOULD THEY SAY THAT TO A MAN????

I WAS ELATED FOR HER VICTORY. I'VE ALWAYS LIKE CHRIS
MATHEWS BUT LATELY HE IS SPEAKING HIS VERY PERSONAL
THOUGHTS OUT LOUD, HE SHOULD KEEP THEM MORE HIDDEN.
I THINK IN LARGE THIS NEWS MEDIA IS PRETENDING TO MAKE AND BREAK PRESIDENTS, IT'S NOT THEIR JOB. I'M
GLAD NEW HAMPSHIRE RESIDENTS SAID, "HOLD UP, YOU'RE
NOT GOING TO DICTATE WHO I VOTE FOR". LAST NIGHT IT
WAS A PROUD MOMENT FOR ME, FOR HILLARY, FOR THE COUNTRY.

Something's happening here

Waterdog, Knoxville, TN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:29:59 GMT

First off, Hillary shed no tears. She did get passionate about her country. What's wrong with that? I'm thrilled to have her as a candidate. I'm also thrilled to have Barak Obama and John Edwards and Joe Biden and all the others. I hope they all win one of the next few states so they can go on. I don't think that I have ever seen the democrats field such a magnificent slate of talent. I think any of them could make a great President. I haven't decided who I'll vote just yet, but they all deserve our support not dirision. How many of the people trying to tear down one or the other of these fine candidates would have the cojones to put themselves and thier reputations on the line to run for dogcatcher much less President. I applaud them all and may the best "person" win. By the way, just for the record I'm a white male.

Something's happening here

robin, new york, new york — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:30:10 GMT

This was a beautifully written and thoughtful article. I do agree with some of the points made. But I do not understand how Hilary Clinton's main problem is constantly overlooked. She has been running an extremely negative campaign, where she seems to focus on the "faults" of other candidates, without offering concrete examples of what she is going to do to make changes!! Barack Obama has a wonderful, warm and genuine way of communicating and while this should not be the criteria for becoming president, he is able to be convincing in his concern for change because he is not focusing on someone else's "shortcomings". He is trying to show what he would like to do. I love what I am hearing from him! I and so many others are disgusted with the negativity and the status quo that Hilary Clinton is projecting.

Something's happening here

Tim, Franklin, MA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:30:12 GMT

Even the bus driver was surprised? Amazing, because you know how hard it is to surprise them.
What?
Could it be that in the end, Obama was significant, but also a bit of a curiosity for the good people of New Hampshire.
I have to say that the returning soldier's analogy is a bit over the top. Eloquent,absolutely. Interesting, yes. But a long way to go to get folks like New Hampshirites to bite.
Substance required.
Lesson- you guys (media) again bought all the polls.

Something's happening here

Waterdog, Knoxville, TN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:30:39 GMT

Something's happening here

Bob Alington, Elmira, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:30:52 GMT

Thank you Brian Williams for showing that some news people can admit they make mistakes, after all they are human too!

Something's happening here

Nancy Siegenthaler — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:31:01 GMT

Thanks for the comments on your profession. A former journalist myself, I know that ratings are everything. But don't the cynical commenters on Clinton's emotionalism know that we educated viewers will simply turn them off for the rest of the campaign? Talk about shooting yourself in the foot!

Something's happening here

Mike de Borja — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:31:39 GMT

Your mea culpa doesn't excuse the fact that Hillary Clinton has been judged not only by higher standards than her main opponents but also with mean bias. Media
snarled & bit at her like a pack of rabid dogs. It was despicable and depressing. I admit to be inspired by Obama but I also objectively see him as a traditional politician, a snake oil salesman. And also objectively, I can't be lured by poetic words when what this country really needs is someone with intelligence, a lifetime of working on issues important to the american people and yes, experience. NH has sealed the deal. The next president will be a democrat, Hillary Clinton!

Something's happening here

Danielle Ewenin, Mclaughlin South Dakota — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:31:57 GMT

Even yet, CNN still clings to their biases, and prejudices, ignoring the voice and social climate of the United States. Obama is a great man, but for me he does not instill the confidence in the system that Hilliary does for me. I am confident that our country would be good and do fine in the world, when Hillary Clinton is President of the United.
It does not matter to me that her husband is Bill-former president. It does not matter to me that Obama stands the chance of being the first black person as president or he represents a change in the politics.
I must have confidence in our leaders, I must be able to believe in them, or I as a individual, totally dependent on them for our place in world affairs know I and my family could suffer if they are not true leaders.
Hillary Clinton (and for the first time, in a very long time,) I have have confidence and chance to believe that our country can be great.
To me she represents what is in my heart, what I would like to say, and see in the world, in my country, in my state and in my community.
I feel inspired and it is so refreshing to believe again.

Something's happening here

The real comeback kid — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:31:57 GMT

This is what happens when the media reports news that is not yet news. They need to scoop the other guy but rarely admit being wrong, only "we called it here first". Stick to reporting the news when it is news..like reporting the winner AFTER the election not days before.

We have a few hundred too many "talking heads" on TV telling us all how to think or the way things need to be.

Something's happening here

L. topps — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:32:01 GMT

I think it is pretty sad for America if we vote for a candidate because they cry on cue. We are the stongest country in the world and this is an embarrassment.

Something's happening here

Waterdog, Knoxville, TN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:32:13 GMT

Something's happening here

Alfonso Padilla, Miami, Florida — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:32:28 GMT

You know im shocked that the crying got Hillary so much support. I live in Miami and i spoke to alot of women of different ages and i came away with this. Young women saw the crying as a sign of weakness, "Crying, Theres no crying in Baseball" as one under 30 woman commented to me. They often told me, "what is she going to cry when she meets Putin, or when a summit meeting is not going the way she wants it to go?". But the older woman, like my mother who really really doesnt like Hillary, had a lot of sympathy for her. I still have the question of How can you go from crying to a smile and attacking your opponet in 3.2 miliseconds is beyond me?

Something's happening here

gael lawson, groton,c t — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:32:44 GMT

OK, noone has pounted out a few obvious things: independents voted by the scores! Out of state "independents" can register in NH to vote, on just the possibility that they mght someday move there. HRC bussed in tons of women/youth from other states to populate her rallies - and to vote. It was an inflated vote and will be overturned in other states.

Something's happening here

George, Sayreville, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:33:31 GMT

Are we voting for homecoming king/queen or the president of the US? People felt sorry for her, so they voted for her? This is the basis people are using to cast their vote?

"I don't care who the better candidate is. I feel sorry for the person, so I'm going to vote for them."

That's as bad as voting for the person simply because they're a Democrat or a Replublican!

No wonder this country is in such poor shape! It's pathetic!

Something's happening here

Dozirulf — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:34:29 GMT

Good article. Makes sense.

Something's happening here

Danielle Ewenin, Mclaughlin South Dakota — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:34:32 GMT

Even yet, CNN still clings to their biases, and prejudices, ignoring the voice and social climate of the United States. Obama is a great man, but for me he does not instill the confidence in the system that Hilliary does for me. I am confident that our country would be good and do fine in the world, when Hillary Clinton is President of the United.
It does not matter to me that her husband is Bill-former president. It does not matter to me that Obama stands the chance of being the first black person as president or he represents a change in the politics.
I must have confidence in our leaders, I must be able to believe in them, or I as a individual, totally dependent on them for our place in world affairs know I and my family could suffer if they are not true leaders.
Hillary Clinton (and for the first time, in a very long time,) I have have confidence and chance to believe that our country can be great.
To me she represents what is in my heart, what I would like to say, and see in the world, in my country, in my state and in my community. And all the polls and new coverage will not change that.
I feel inspired and it is so refreshing to believe again.

Something's happening here

BARBARA P, YONKERS NEW YORK — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:34:42 GMT

Something's happening here

Nancy Siegenthaler — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:34:55 GMT

Something's happening here

Dozirulf — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:34:57 GMT

Good article. Makes sense.

Something's happening here

Lillian Needham, Phila., PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:35:32 GMT

Well done, Brian.
You are straight forward and call a spade a spade. This is why I listen to your nightly news. Do you think this miscalculation could help wake up the journalists or will they continue to be lulled to sleep by their own agenda or hopes?

Lillian Needham, Phila.,PA

Something's happening here

Lillian Needham, Phila., PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:35:38 GMT

Something's happening here

P.F. Geddie — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:36:27 GMT

Ho Hum. More pontificating because polotics is the easiest story to cover. This piece is full of guessing and speculation. What a waste of air!

Have all you guys have all forgotten that the REAL election doesn't come until November 8th? What ELSE is going on in the nation and the world?

Something's happening here

Darryl, Centreville, VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:36:31 GMT

PLEASE, MAYOR BLOOMBERG, GIVE US INDEPENDENTS A CANDIDATE FOR WHOM WE CAN VOTE.

Something's happening here

Danielle Ewenin, Mclaughlin South Dakota — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:36:37 GMT

Even yet, CNN still clings to their biases, and prejudices, ignoring the voice and social climate of the United States. Obama is a great man, but for me he does not instill the confidence in the system that Hillary does for me. I am confident that our country would be good and do fine in the world, when Hillary Clinton is President of the United.
It does not matter to me that her husband is Bill-former president. It does not matter to me that Obama stands the chance of being the first black person as president or he represents a change in the politics.
I must have confidence in our leaders, I must be able to believe in them, or I as a individual, totally dependent on them for our place in world affairs know I and my family could suffer if they are not true leaders.
Hillary Clinton (and for the first time, in a very long time,) I have confidence and chance to believe that our country can be great.
To me she represents what is in my heart, what I would like to say, and see in the world, in my country, in my state and in my community. And all the polls and new coverage will not change that.
I feel inspired and it is so refreshing to believe again.

Something's happening here

Steve Loehner — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:36:47 GMT

I am a former Democrat, now independent and was never a big fan of Hilary. The press coverage of Hilary Clinton this past month has been brutal, unfair and very meanspirited. Just ask her biggest fan, Pat Buchanan. Obama, Edwards and Clinton are or were all Senators. They are all Washington insiders to one degree or another. Hilary Clinton has as much right to claim herself a "change" candidate as any one of the. Like so many, I like Barack Obama too. However, we need an experienced battle tested leader to straighten out the colossal mess created by our current president. For me, this race is between Clinton and McCain. Sorry, but Obama is just too young and too inexperienced to get my vote at this time.

Something's happening here

Danielle Ewenin, Mclaughlin South Dakota — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:36:59 GMT

Even yet, CNN still clings to their biases, and prejudices, ignoring the voice and social climate of the United States. Obama is a great man, but for me he does not instill the confidence in the system that Hillary does for me. I am confident that our country would be good and do fine in the world, when Hillary Clinton is President of the United.
It does not matter to me that her husband is Bill-former president. It does not matter to me that Obama stands the chance of being the first black person as president or he represents a change in the politics.
I must have confidence in our leaders, I must be able to believe in them, or I as a individual, totally dependent on them for our place in world affairs know I and my family could suffer if they are not true leaders.
Hillary Clinton (and for the first time, in a very long time,) I have confidence and chance to believe that our country can be great.
To me she represents what is in my heart, what I would like to say, and see in the world, in my country, in my state and in my community. And all the polls and new coverage will not change that.
I feel inspired and it is so refreshing to believe again.

Something's happening here

Ted, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:37:10 GMT

Denis Plante - "Cliton"? Just because you are short an "n", Denis, there is no reason to short change Hillary.

Something's happening here

Jeanne Cordova, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:37:18 GMT

Thank you Brian W. for the apology from the press, although it should have been Chris Matthews saying it. You guys, and I do mean "guys" since you don't really listen to the women like Rachel and the editor from The Nation, really got it wrong. And we women didn't appreciate your tossing Hillary into past history after Iowa. Remember the second half of the quote, "There's something happening here ... what it is ain't exactly clear." So why don't you guys in the media just listen for a while 'til you figure it out.
PS: And send Chris to sexism school. He's in danger of being "yesterday."

Something's happening here

steve burgess rochester, n.y. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:37:20 GMT

Nice arcitle Brian,
and hurah for n.h.for not being so predictable the election process is a lot like sports,thats why we play the game. regardless of who wins it is nice to see the canadiates true personalities come out. and i am sure as time goes on we will see more and more of that .

Something's happening here

Bernard Perry, Wales, Michigan — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:37:32 GMT

Ron Paul is the only honest candidate. He is the one that wants to end income tax. This is completely possible because of the pork barrel spending our government does. We simple reign in the spending and then taxes can be gone! Do the math, if we cut our spending to the mid 90's, we wouldn't even need income tax.

Btw, did you know 10 times more people died in car accidents the past five years then terrorist attacks? Why then do we spend trillions of dollars on this stuff when we leave our borders wide open? The simple fact of that matter.

Ron paul for president 2008, it's not to late for someone who is honest and a constitutionlist!

www.ronpaul2008.com

Something's happening here

B.J.Often — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:37:34 GMT

Ohh, big frickin news flash. Biliary went up to NH and all the liberal faggots voted for her. Gee, how did this happen.

As for thinking the talking heads know everything, just how ignorant are the people of America. I mean, they actually think there is a big difference from FOX to CNN news. How stupid is that. Now there is a news story.

Something's happening here

Ted, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:37:43 GMT

Denis Plante - "Cliton"? Just because you are short an "n", Denis, there is no reason to short change Hillary.

Something's happening here

Mary F. Butera — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:38:37 GMT

Brian Williams's thoughtful report brought me to express my political concerns at this time. I believe this is the most important presidential election in our country as our country is being challenged in every imaginable way: by 'good ole boy' politics, an aging population, influx of immigrants, mass technology with relatively unknown implications and ramifications, a declining economy and an unpopular war, to name five. In other words, we are traveling in uncharted waters that are constantly changing -- nothing new in some of these five areas, but the speed at which the affect of one change affects another is relatively new and, sometimes, unimaginable -- uncharted; therefore, we need a president who can understand these complexities and thrive while 'immersed' in them. The election of Senator Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire dramatically underscores my point -- time is teaching us to more quickly expect the unexpected. Whether I am for a particular candidate is irrelevant. It is our world. Each one of us must take full responsibility for the vote we cast at this most important time of our history. I fully believe we are at 'a point of no return.' We must each vote for the person whom we believe will best lead our country. Plain and simple, each vote is important. It is our vote, and we must vote with intelligence for our family and for our country. My message is to encourage other voters to use their vote to choose the candidate they believe will best lead our country.

Something's happening here

Ruth Ann, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:00 GMT

I was truly incredulous at Chris Matthews' clearly open endorsement of Barack Obama, while all the time trying to disguise it as "reporting." Give me a break! I switched to another channel for a less biased coverage of the NH primary last night. Even Fox News was preferable, and that's saying something!

Also unbelieveable was the media's seeming belief that the nominating process begins and ends in Iowa. Why even bother with the other states? Maybe we should just let the two candidates who win their respective parties in Iowa go directly to the general election. "Supporters" abandon candidates after one loss in the one contest completed? Ever hear of a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Lastly, if Hillary shows emotion, she's too soft or manipulative. If she shows no emotion, she's strident and unlikeable--whereas if she were a man she would just be seen as strong and capable. Blatant sexism!

Something's happening here

Ted, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:10 GMT

Denis Plante - "Cliton"? Just because you are short an "n", Denis, there is no reason to short change Hillary.

Something's happening here

Sally Perkins, Tacoma, WA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:19 GMT

Sen. Clinton said EXACTLY what I believe, that this election is for real, that we HAVE to get our country back. Please tell Tim Russert to stop misinterpreting this as "some emotional (code word for female) moment." When we DARE to hope for the future, this is how Americans feel.

Something's happening here

Bill Camarda — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:28 GMT

Your thoughtful comments are a welcome counterpoint to Chris Matthews' terrible performance last night. I wondered how many hours it would take for Matthews, Fineman, et al, to actually notice that the numbers that were rolling below them (and the results of their exit polls) completely contradicted everything they were telling us.

I am not a supporter of Hillary Clinton's: she was my eighth choice in the original Democratic field. But the way she has been treated by the media is nothing short of a disgrace. Too many of you have acted like the worst middle school cliques. You didn't even treat the woman decently when she brought you coffee and doughnuts!

I hope your colleagues will learn something from the experience. But I fear you have that correct, too: "Give us a few weeks — we will promptly forget the lessons of this debacle..."

How, exactly, do we get rid of reporters who never learn the lessons of their debacles, and replace them with reporters who do? How, exactly, do we hold you accountable? Because the responsibilities you all hold are, actually, important.

Something's happening here

Patty -[ Flint, MI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:29 GMT

It's a sad state to read so many women voting with their emotions rather than their heads. Yes, I agree that the media got cocky and that hurt Obama in the long run. But - the Clinton's need to regroup and play nice. I've been fans of theirs for years, but not since Bill and Hillary got petulant. Obama is what the country and world needs now...flat-out inspiration! We don't need a president who breaks down in tears when the going gets tough. I'm a proud Obama-mama!!!

Something's happening here

Brian, Melbourne, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:41 GMT

I don't suppose its occurred to anyone that the cries of "Clinton is finished" were beautifully orchestrated to make a narrow victory in NH (Obama still has more electoral votes) look like a massive comeback?

The spin that its a response to the media telling people what to think, instead of the reality that its the media controlling what people think, is the icing on the cake.

Something's happening here

Don Barthelmess Santa Barbara, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:48 GMT

This reminds me of 2000 when Tom Brokaw at NBC projected Al Gore to win the Presidency before Polls even closed on the West Coast.

We all know how that turned out.

The country needs to stop relying on television media to report information that is factual. Television is opinion.

Today's "Journalists" are biased sensationalists to say the least.

Something's happening here

Scott Hardy, Scarborough, Maine — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:49 GMT

Something's happening here

Steve Loehner — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:39:58 GMT

Something's happening here

Scott Hardy, Scarborough, Maine — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:40:36 GMT

Something's happening here

Judy thompson — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:40:50 GMT

I agree that Obama's loss in New Hampshire will only help to strengthen him. He originally came into NH as an underdog even though he won the Iowa caucus. Hillary has had her strength in NH for along time. She has worked tirelessly there. This presidential nomination is a true race and will make both candidates better prepared for each successive encounter. I am in support of Obama and feel we need what he brings to the table which is the ability to bring American's together and willing to work for a common cause across party lines. This is where I think Hillary has a weakness; however if she is the Democratic candidate, I will vote for her. I am an independent and like it that way. There is no one in the Republican Party that stands out for me.

Something's happening here

Johannah, Palm City, Florida — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:41:02 GMT

The media didn't get it wrong. I was appalled to see Hillary Clinton get that emotional. I felt that a woman who has prided herself on her experience and ability to make it in the political arena with these gentleman needed to keep her emotions in check. My generation has been called "soccer moms" to "the must needed vote" for this woman's campaign. Trust me she did not look Presidential and frankly lost my vote entirely because she couldn't keep her emotions in check. And I don't care how sincere she was. Save your emotional state of mind for the pillow "Hillary!" I need to know that the person who's making the decisions for me at the level of "President of the United States" is checking their emotions at the door. This is politics...and I am a native New Englander now thing is the South. You lost my vote!

Something's happening here

Gary Wright — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:41:41 GMT

Okay, Now we are really seeing what the news media is doing not only in New Hampshire but in the way that they "see" the Big Picture. They are there to report the news not put their twist on it or to "calculate" the winner. But once again NBC news is supporting Hillary Clinton because she won.
Brian, leave your opinions in the news room and let us voters make the decisions like we used to.

Something's happening here

connie, rogersville,alabama — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:41:52 GMT

I am totally ashamed of the press, they are to report the news not make the news. Calling any winner before the votes are all counted is a joke and pie on the face to them, the american people and anyone that has any education. My five year old could see that it was a mistake. so that being said the press needs to grow up and report only when it is finished and not before.

Something's happening here

Mark Ivon, Saginaw, MI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:03 GMT

The biggest loser in NH, the press? I beg to differ. As in the above article and most of the media coverage, Hillary gets most of the media coverage (hence, more exposure). So how did the press lose when you are obviously trying to get her elected?

Something's happening here

Grace Pasqualotto - Montreal, Quebec - CANADA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:06 GMT

In future, every time a pundit targets Hillary as an official dump site to the exclusion of her fellow politicians.... first one, then two, then a multitude of yes, older women will stand up and head for those polling booths and vote for her.

Something's happening here

Michele, St. Louis, Mo — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:29 GMT

It sounds from this article that you are an Obama MAN! Enough said.

Something's happening here

Tom Arnold Oklahoma City, OK — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:35 GMT

Excellent and brilliant piece Brian!! This is the type of attitude I WISH we could see from ALL the media. .. so refreshing! PLEASE keep more of these coming!

Something's happening here

Therese Kaelin, Louisivlle, KY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:41 GMT

Tell MSNBC that Chris Matthews needs to take his foot out of his mouth and report the news. He is the reason so many people in NH changed their minds about Hillary. He needs to report the news not make the news. I once was a great fan of his but now I am lost forever.

Something's happening here

Grace Pasqualotto - Montreal, Quebec - CANADA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:42 GMT

Something's happening here

Betty West — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:47 GMT

Brian, I loved your piece. I was glad to see that a lot of people got it all wrong. I vote for whomever I think is the best person, whether it is a Republican or Democrat. I am just an average American citizen. Only High School educated, and I don't always follow politics a lot. I love the job you are doing on the news now (although I loved your appearance on Saturday Night Live). I don't often e-mail on my views, the last time was when Tom Cruise was so rude to Matt Lauer. My complaint is that everyone was talking about all of the crowds at Obama's rallies, come on, they weren't all of the people who were voting.The press was really horrible to Hillary Clinton. They jumped on what Bill said about making her younger etc., he wasn't putting her down like they reported. I believe she is a very intelligent, caring, and strong woman. I think she would do a good job as our president. I still haven't decided for sure, but I think I want more experience with the problems confronting us, over someone with very little experience. Keep up the good work. By the way, I am 69 years old, not a kid.

Something's happening here

Charles, Fayetteville, NC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:42:49 GMT

I can only say that I wish the media would report the story without bias rather than what they have been doing and writting the story the way they want it played out. I will vote for Mr Huckabee however I thought they did Hilary and the whole voting public a great injustice in telling us how NH was going to vote. Again, the media should just report the story without bias.

Something's happening here

Gonzalo Aldape — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:43:11 GMT

Are you kidding me???
This election is not about gender, experience or not.
This is about our future, our history, the amrican legacy and we are squandering ourselves in competition between media and mediocre politicians.

The true story right now is that less then 50% of democrats voted and Hillary only got 37% of the 50% and Obama much less. Almost 70% of the NH Democrat silently voted that they do not like or care for any of the candidates - think about it; less then 50% of the registered Democrat voted (!!!) and Hillary got only 35% of that vote, how can we claim a winner??
The headline and your lead story should be "American Democrat voters lose for a second time - they still dont have a bonafide candidate".

You want to talk "Viwer Ratings"??? Touch the nerve of the 70% of Democrats by reporting(about)their silence - I guarntee you that your ratings will be much higher then reporting who the miniscule minority voted for and who cried.

Something's happening here

Marie, Ia — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:43:46 GMT

I think the media needs to back off on all the speculations!! Let the voters decide for themselves.
Also stop projecting winners when the polls are still open!!
Go Hillary!!

Something's happening here

Mary M. Thompson — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:43:48 GMT

Yeah, Brian, thanks for the mea culpa. Now if you can apologize for all the other brainless things you've said over the past several years, I might be able to forgive you.

YOU GUYS ARE NOT GODS! Get over yourselves and quit condescending to those of us who are not part of the beltway. How many times do reporters and pundits have to be wrong and still be able to look at themselves in the mirror? But you all never learn and it just continues to get worse. And guess what? Those of us to whom you pander are not idiots. Way to go.

BTW, your Hillary bias is loud and clear.

The big winner here is obviously the democratic party. People are pissed off and have seen how they can affect change by coming out to vote. It was obvious in 2006 and even more so now. Hip Hip Hooray!

Something's happening here

Keith, Salem ,NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:43:53 GMT

While it is nice to see memebers of the media like Williams admit when they got it wrong, some are forgeting it was only the Democratic polling that was way off. The Republican polls were dead on.

i think some of the polling now has to have their credibillity questioned.

Something's happening here

Lisa Potts, Charleston, South Carolina — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:43:53 GMT

I am so angered by the media coverage of this campaign so far. The media, as a whole, has attempted to tell Americans who the viable candidates should be. This started months ago when Clinton and Obama were the media favorites and were the only ones who got coverage. So many people I speak with said that they really like John Edwards but the media led them to think he had very little support. I beleive that all of the issue framing and opinions on the part of subjective media types is harming this democracy and that all candidates should be given equal media time and attention so the people can decide. More than anything else, Barack's wave was about celebrity, not issues. People flocked to see what the heck all the hype was about. When it wasn't about much, they voted otherwise. I am so glad that you all were embarrased by the results. You should be so ashamed of yourselves and the coverage of this campaign thus far.

Something's happening here

Pat Rye, Altamonte Springs, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:44:17 GMT

This morning I received an email from Hillary Clinton that said in part "when I needed you most, you came through with flying colors" because I had made a contribution to her campaign the night before the N.H. election when I and everyone else thought she would surely lose, and lose big. I was elated by her victory. The main reason she won rather than Obama is his lack of experience. As someone else said, if a woman ran for president with only 2 years experience in the U.S. Senate they would be laughed out of town. I am so thankful the people of N.H. realized what was important and came though for Hillary.

Something's happening here

Wayne E Mize, McMinnville, OR — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:44:52 GMT

It has been a very long time since I felt good about America. The last few days of the New Hampshire primary have given me hope. I feel it in my heart. Who wins is really not important. What is important is that, yes, something is happening. And it makes my heart smile.

Something's happening here

Sal Cisneros — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:44:59 GMT

Something's happening here

Brian Lewis, Tucson, Arizona — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:46:52 GMT

Yeah, Hilary won by about 2%. Whoop-de-do. Three more votes for Obama and you'd be calling him the sure-thing democratic nominee, but since she stomped him with that whopping 2%, suddenly she's struck a chord with the voters and returned to the race.

Oh, and I love the irony of Brian Williams, a leading man of the media, denouncing the media itself. YOU are the media, Williams.

Something's happening here

Kathy, Eugene, OR — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:47:38 GMT

Hillary has shown she can take the punches from the media, the pundits, and everyone else that has that has tried to discredit her over the years and still remain standing tall. I have no doubt she can stand up to a rough campaign and defeat her Republican opponent. I like Obama but he has proven nothing to me except that he's good at making speeches. Hillary has earned my respect and vote. It's time for the media to acknowledge she's earned their respect too.

Something's happening here

Mark Ermi Las Vegas NV — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:48:43 GMT

Mr. Williams somebody must ask Mr.Obama What does he know about foreign policy. What can he do about our for see able recession. And why is the media you Mr Williams giving him a free ride. Just because Mr.Obama is a wonderful speaker does not mean he could be a great leader.look at our current Pres.

Something's happening here

Dale — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:49:03 GMT

Brian, as usual you wrote an upstanding piece. I am a republican and I am leaning towards the side of Obama. Why, because we need freshness not staleness in the Whithouse, we need new blood, not old. We need real people,not people who have to fake tears like a little spoiled child to get his or her own way! We need someone who is not making this "personal" but someone who is making this run for the people of the United States of America!!!

Something's happening here

William P Davis, Chicago, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:49:08 GMT

No wonder Barack lost New Hampshire. With all due respect, to you Brian from a fan, but apparently sons and daughters of New England were confused by Barack’s manner of speech, “Obamics”. When he beckons to voters, “Let’s make history together,” he’s doesn’t mean Black History. He’s not caught up in the notion of being the first African American president. He’s talking about making the kind of history that a nation’s people make when they unite in common cause and demand change. That is the magnitude of change citizens have been craving, “to take back government,” to “change the way things are done in Washington.” I wonder. When people listen to the inspiring oratory Barack is credited with delivering, are they uplifted by the words of a great American? Or, are they inspired by the performance of a talented African American making history?

Something's happening here

rOBERTA GILMARTIN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:49:13 GMT

WHAT THE MEDIA DID TO HILLARY WAS OUTRAGEOUS! SINCE THE MEDIA IS DOMINATED BY MEN IT IS FAIRLY OBVIOUS THAT THEY HAVE AN AGENDA!!! THEY DO NOT WANT A WOMAN IN POWER!~
GOOD FOR YOU HILLARY!!

Something's happening here

Eleanor Gorman, Forestville, California — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:49:34 GMT

It is a good admission, Brian, but not nearly enough. There have been so little facts discussed about the issues of this campaign that I, once a firm supporter of the "media" now question myself on this account.Everything is about the race. So many of the newscasters are smug about whomever they please. Some scepticism about Hillary Clinton is legitimate. But the point was made by the post-polling reports last night. EXPERIENCE factor had a lot to do with the voting. I, myself, am a bit torn over the candidates. Obama is so inspiring, and yet, the experience of Hillary Clinton makes me more confident going forward in the ever more complicated national security and international relations issues our country faces. She is so tough, and I like that. I heard one commentator talk about the race factor. I certainly believe I'm being honest when I say that if Obama had had another 4 years in the Senate I'd feel more confident in a vote for him. But I think today, it's essential to vote for the candidate who will move the country in the right direction and not to decide solely on the basis of an ideal that might not manifest itself once reality sets in. It's unclear and I'm still undecided, but please, don't insult our intelligence or our character. Take a look at your own (the media)!

Something's happening here

Steve Anderson, Newton, Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:50:34 GMT

The media informing everyone that Obama was the winner reminds me of the same media that told the nation before the Clinton victory in '92 that we were in a recession. Later, as a media footnote, Clinton's GAO announced that the recession had ended in '90, and we were in a period of economic growth.
Leave it to the media to help shape elections instead of reporting on them.

Something's happening here

Jeff Vennard - Des Moines, IA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:50:53 GMT

L. B. Johnson once said "If I wake up one morning and walk accross the Potomac, the evening headlines would read ""President can't swim"". That is why I quite watching the national news broadcast years ago. You folks don't report the news, you analyze it according to your own agendas. Nice peice, Brian, but you and your peers won't change. You will continue as usual, analyzing the news even before it happens.

Something's happening here

Carolyn Reynolds, Eutawville, SC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:50:55 GMT

I told my husband when Hilary was aired that evening with tears welling in her eyes, that the armour had finally cracked and it was a good thing. Your article was right on the money. thank you

Something's happening here

Sandy NEW HAMPSHIRE — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:51:11 GMT

As a NH voter I was apalled at the way the media specifically MSNBC and Chris Matthews were so busy putting Hillary in the grave while not reporting what was going on in front of their faces!
Had I not voted for Obama earlier that day I would have seriously considered voting for Hillary just to spite them!
They should report the news not try and write it!

Something's happening here

Richard Wesson — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:51:12 GMT

Brain:
We watch your program each evening if possible. However the emphasis on polls and spin is like a grandmother showing off her grandkids' photos. Its interesting to the family by bores everyone else. What we are interested in is analysis of issues rather then what is interesting to you and your staff. We understand that you are interested in the strategy but we are more interested in the issues e.g what is position difference on the war between Clinton and Obamba, who would possibly be in their cabinets, what is is the differences in their tax policies. While the inside talk is sometimes interesting the constant focus is not

Something's happening here

Mario Giacalone Croton on Hudson, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:52:20 GMT

Yes the pundits got it wrong. But lets examine this. In an era when more people vote for American Idea contestants than for the president and the "news" media resembles the gossip colloms of old, is it any wonder the the "pop star" qualities of Barack Obama caught the starry eyes of political correspondants.
Mr. Obama may be more than an American Ideal, and Hillary my be more thana calulating politician. But we the electrate will have to search hard to discover who they really are because the so called "professionals" won't be of any help.

Something's happening here

Percie, Youngstown,OH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:52:59 GMT

Thank you Mr. Williams. If everyone in this country doesn't realize how much our own country is in need of "fixing" - gas prices, housing, our bridges falling down while we are trying to build bridges in other countries, lead imports from China affecting our children, relationships between people in our homeland and abroad - then we are walking around with blinders on. Whichever politician wins needs to be committed to getting us back on track by coming up with a plan - with the first plan being not waste time trying to bring the other candidates down. The media can certainly help promote the positive or feed the frenzy of the negative (which ususally get more air time).

Something's happening here

Polly, Illinois — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:53:54 GMT

What have the Clintons done to Chris Matthews to make him sooo bitter towards them? I used to watch him every day until he started making his sarcastic remarks about Mrs. Clinton. I hope she wins all the primaries, even though I like Obama very much. It's her time and his will come

Something's happening here

Sue, Bellevue, NE — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:54:01 GMT

To the person who said they will vote for Hillary now because she is being "picked on"...please. Maybe you need to come to my 8th grade history class to learn how to choose a candidate. As for Hillary's "experience", all but her few years in the Senate were as a civilian...Mrs. Bill Clinton, First Lady of Arkansas, and even First Lady do not count as experience for being the leader of the free world.

Something's happening here

Micheal W. Peterson, Sioux Falls, SD — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:54:08 GMT

Thank you Brian Williams. Your elucidity is beyond criticism. It is one reason I watch you nightly to get an honest feel for the day's events.

Is Chris Wallace employed by Lush Rimbaugh and his excellence in broadcasting facade. His very open contempt for Hillary Clinton goes beyond any journalistic approach I have heard in the last twenty years.

Thank you again for redeeming our ideals of journalistic reporting.

Something's happening here

Paul Nelson, Hackensack, N.J. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:54:18 GMT

I thought that I was alone in noting Chris Mathew's inexcusable treatment of Hillary
Clinton. He has become increasingly rude and crass to guests on his show,inerrupting them constantly By comparison, Brian Williams exudes class and insight in his analysis of the media.

Paul Nelson, Hackensack, N.J.

Something's happening here

cindy farwell elkland, pa — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:54:21 GMT

I think Brian Williams got it exactly right. I am so much in awe of Hilary and believe in her ability to get our country back on track after 7+ years with the arrogantly poor leader that now presides over the white house. It was especially significant to me to see that overweight, pompous Bill Bennett tell americans on CNN that the Clintons were going out just like the Nixons--since when does he have any credibility? I say for the first time in over 200 years, let's vote a woman of strength, integrity and work ethic along with amazing experience into the Presidency. I am proud now to be an American!

Something's happening here

Steve L. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:54:42 GMT

I am a former Democrat, now independent and was never a big fan of Hilary. The press coverage of Hilary Clinton this past month has been brutal, unfair and very meanspirited. Just ask her biggest fan, Pat Buchanan. Obama, Edwards and Clinton are all Senators. They are all Washington insiders to one degree or another. Hilary Clinton has as much right to claim herself a "change" candidate as any one of them being a woman. Like so many, I like Barack Obama too. However, we need an experienced battle tested leader to straighten out the colossal mess created by our current president. For me, this race is between Clinton and McCain. She's the smartest, most seasoned person in the room, and he's the most principled. Sorry, but Obama is just too young and too inexperienced to get my vote at this time. I am glad the media is eating crow right now.

Something's happening here

Elinor — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:54:59 GMT

Thank you Brian for your insightful comments and willingness to discuss the mishandling of campaign reporting. I, too, am weary of pundits slash and burn style of reporting this election. The media had a gleeeful time kicking Haillary Clinton and have the nerve to attempt to sway public opionion. Please do not tell the American public who will win the election. WE DECIDE. MSNBC has no room to talk about FOX News and their "fair and balanced" slogan.

Something's happening here

April, Beaumont, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:55:52 GMT

I find it interesting (and more than a little offputting) that voters of any state would change their minds and convictions about a candidate because they thought another candidate was being "beaten up" or "picked on" by the press. If your vote was initially for Obama or Edwards, and a pundit saying that Hillary's tears were contrived makes you change your vote, then you are just as bad as the pundit. You are playing into the media, paying their checks and inflating their influence over the most important election in recent history. Not to mention the fact that media scrutiny of the president-elect will be much harsher. Choosing a candidate is not about pity or licking their battle wounds for them. It is about researching all the candidates, all the issues, all the facets, and then searching your heart and mind for the most appropriate match. Maybe the press did Senator Clinton an injustice (although I do happen to think the choking up was a put-on for both the cameras and the room full of women she was entertaining). Nonetheless, it doesn't mean that supporters of other candidates should change their vote to make up for it. Don't let Hillary fool you - she is a big girl.

Something's happening here

M. Harding Burgoyne, Salt Lake City, UT 84117 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:56:48 GMT

Finally--some insight from the press about itself concerning the massacres of the last ten days. I was appalled at how the press was trying to "spin" and therefore change the turnout of the elections. I lost respect for your "Hardball" players and wrote Tom Curry--twice to say "just saying so doesn't make it happen."
Hillary's tears were genuine. Remember when Ronald Reagan "teared up" during speeches. No one went after him like a wolf pack. I have always been for Hillary. Never did she look more beautiful than when she "showed a little emotion." Watch that segment again. Also, the press had by its own admonition the second place finishers going home, but not the distant third place finishers. South Carolina is just one state. Mike Huckabee still ran that negative ad he showed the press in three counties in Iowa on voting day. John MaCain ran the Iraq ad. The only negative ads the press harped about were Mitt Romney's and those were only over the issues, not character like the other two candidates' ads. NO distinction was made because the press obviously doesn't like Romney. He is a much nicer man than the press indicates. The press will never influence my vote; the candidates will. Be more respectful, please.
Chris Matthews said late last night that he would never underestimate Hillary again. I hope he honors his words. He is brilliant; he ought to. Thank you, Mr. Williams, for the up-close truth about the misleading reporting. The press helped Hillary when it didn't mean to. Go Hillary.

Something's happening here

Imran, New York, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:57:13 GMT

The only thing that the media did not do was project Obama as winner. Otherwise they almost crucified Mrs. Clinton. They did this in 2000 election and now they did it again. Are they ever going to act like news people and stop acting like gods. Shame on you all for such ignorance and stupidity even though you were equpped with all the tools and resources. Bravo to the people of NH.

Something's happening here

JOE MERCURIO, MEDORA, IL. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:57:22 GMT

MR. WILLIAMS, I WANT TO TELL YOU THAT I WATCH YOUR TELECAST EVERY NIGHT AND MUST SAY THAT I FEEL THAT I GET THE BEST REPORTING ON THE AIR FROM YOU AND ALL THE OTHERS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE BROADCAST.

I LIVE IN ILLINOIS AND I WONDER HOW THE CANDIDATES AND THE MEDIA WOULD REACT IF WE WERE THE FIRST PRIMARY. WOULD WE THEN BECOME LIKE IOWA AND NEW HAMPSHIRE AND BE DESCRIBED AS HAVING SOME SPECIAL ABILITY TO DISCERN WHO IS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT!! THE SIMPLE TRUTH IS THAT IOWA AND NEW HAMPSHIRE ARE VERY SMALL AND COMPACT AND ARE EASILY TRAVELED BY THE CANDIDATES AND OBVIOUSLY THE FIRST IN THE PRIMARY SEASON.
PERSONALLY I AM GLAD THAT THE VOTERS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE DID NOT FALL INTO THE "POLLSTERS WEB OF INEVITABILITY" ABOUT SEN. CLINTON AND FOR THAT I THANK THEM!!
MAYBE NOW THE REST OF US WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO SAY WHO WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE AS THE CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT!

Something's happening here

John Grill,Yelm,Wa. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:57:34 GMT

Brian,
Yesterday on MSNBC Brian went into a sexual climax over Obama’s halo that mothers pushed their babies in front of him for a blessing. As he said I never seen anything like this. So how could he lose?
Perhaps Brian should look who voted for Clinton he will fine they bused them in from other states.

Something's happening here

Estevan, Albuquerque, NM — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:57:56 GMT

Hey Brian, why don't you talk about the real travesty concerning the media in this presidential primary. That would have to be the disgusting lack of coverage to THE MOST qualified and proven candidate in this election, Governor Bill Richardson. It really shocks me that half of the media themselves has stated publicly that Richardson is the best candidate in both parties hands down. Yet when it comes to covering his message, everyone in the mainstream media says, "Great message but.......(fill the blank)."

When the media doesn't project a fair and even playing field to the American people, how can it expect for us to vote correctly? Do you all expect for us actually RESEARCH our candidates!!!??? To those that actually research these candidates, Richardson has a HUGE advantage. Wake up people!! Don't regret your vote four years from now like many Americans are doing right now. Take your country back and put it in the hands of someone who is proven, capable, and the most respected individual that America has had WORLDWIDE in decades!!!

Something's happening here

Linda Lee, Haddon Twp, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:58:02 GMT

It hurts to be rejected because someone more likeable or something newer and more dazzling has come along. That's what Hilliary's tears told us. Any one who's been downsized, technology challenged, or otherwise rejected as unattractive or obsolete has been there. We've felt it and it hurts. I like Obama but it's validating for me when Hillary's efforts and sacrifices are recognized, then perhaps mine are also.

Something's happening here

Bill Camarda, Ramsey, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:58:21 GMT

Something's happening here

Anthony, Austin, Texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:58:22 GMT

Dear Brian,
Thanks for being honest about last night. I too have been really shocked at how negative the media have presented Hillary. Obviously now....it would be refreshing to hear more fact-based reporting and WAY LESS personal viewpoints from all of you "talking heads". I agree that Chris Matthews is the worst of all! He should be sent over to Imus show where they can swap trash!

Something's happening here

Gerald Horst, Fair Oaks Ranch, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:59:21 GMT

Brian, when is MSNBC going to treat all candidates fairly. I know you all do not advertise 'fair and balanced' like your competitor, but come on - Chris and Joe are out of control. "Hillary won NY senate seat because of Bill's missteps"? What fantasy world are they in? Your message is an insult to New York voters.

Something's happening here

John White, Cleveland, OH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:00:29 GMT

Obama lost New Hamshire because of his fly-by speech campaign instead of taking questions and meeting with small group of voters. He should have directly responded to Clinton machine attack, attacked Edwards who basically made Obama look tag-teaming, have a surrogate respond to Bill Clinton directly who will then try to defend his record and finally, even caution media who were already crowning him.

Something's happening here

Dan, Peoria, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:00:32 GMT

We are at a time in history when our country is so divided on every issue and bringing people together "across the aisle" has no meaning. Now we have a candidate who is trying to capitalize on the 'women' vote. Just what we need one more thing to further divide our country - gender!

Something's happening here

TW, SJ, NB — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:01:21 GMT

Interesting this article coming close on the heels of your earlier one about not being able to help being swept along by Obama

Best stick to reporting, not telling the American people what to think (or what you think)

Something's happening here

marc cormack, chelsea AL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:02:16 GMT

Brian's writing is a cute, unbelieveable, poetic spin on the miraculous Clinton turn-around. Let's distill this down to its essence. Brian, you want us to believe that New Englanders, collectively, decided that they needed to stick up for poor Hillary. Brian, these are individuals, not the "Borg". I would suggest a more obvious and believable answer to why Mrs. Clinton beat Obama (and mathematics). Simple. The primary was rigged. All gushing aside, that is the answer that makes sense.

Something's happening here

Hannah Lewin, Carmel, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:02:21 GMT

Your article was terrific and objective. It is refreshing to see someone in the media take responsibility when he got it wrong. So many in the media are trying to spin the results in New Hampshire to reflect and error in the polling or racism among the electorate. I heartily concur with a previous commenter who brought up Chris Matthews and his obvious hatred of the Clintons. I think it is also very patronizing to suggest that women vote with our emotions. Just the contrary, I think many of Barack Obama's followers are caught up in their emotions and being carried along by the "wave". It is time to take a breath and consider the issues. When the New York primary comes along I intend to vote for Hillary because I think she is intelligent, has served the country well in the Senate and is a compassionate person. Hillary has evolved into someone I would be proud to call my President. She has the capacity to be an effective and respected world leader. Hannah Carmel, NY

Something's happening here

Dave Wilkins, Nashua, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:02:49 GMT

Mr. Williams,

I've never felt compelled to write in on a blog like this, much less one written by a mainstream media person. But I have to say, this was a great piece. Well-written, thoughtful, clear -- I wish there was more of this out in the political discourse. I feel the same vibe about Obama. This is the one time in my life I wish I wasn't a libertarian-leaning Republican (Ron Paul is my guy) because I actually kind of want to vote for Obama, even though his policies and philosophy is so different than mine. And absent a third-party run by Ron Paul, I may actually vote for Obama in the general election. He's inspiring and his message while not long on facts, is inspirational.

Keep up the great writing and thoughtful comments.

Dave

Something's happening here

Pam, Exton PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:02:55 GMT

Thanks Brian. The rest of the MSNBC team should be ashamed.
I was shocked when Olberman mocked John McCain - totally, absolutely inexcusable. I turned to FOX - which I ordinarily despise.

Something's happening here

Get Real — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:03:29 GMT

I think the media knew all along what was happening. This is a Dan Rather scandal all over again. Create a straw horse to knock it down--Obama was going to win so now Hilary is a comeback kid. Rather than obama came w/in 2 pts of winning, they are reporting Hilary is the winner. How stupid are people?

Something's happening here

T Anderson, Atlanta, Georgia — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:03:59 GMT

I have never been so repulsed as I was by the commentary last night by the group of talking heads covering the NH primary on MSNBC. The only exception and person I can muster respect for is Tom Brokaw who had the guts to speak up and say "hold on here....you are moving too fast". These guys egos are out of control, turning such serious business into such a disrespectful "comedy" fest - we are not impressed guys. Not only are we dissatisfied with the status quo in Washington...we are equally dissatisfied with the status quo arrogance of the media. If excellence is your goal, you need to raise the bar a lot higher.

Something's happening here

Chris, Topeka — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:04:08 GMT

I think something else was going on. All the candidates' internal polling had Obama way up. What happened in the last 24 hours? We saw Obama's grandmother (don't underestimate the effect...one Latina friend told me she was taken aback to see his very African grandmother), HRC revealed another side of herself, it began to look as if one man (of color) was going to win Iowa and NH. Did people get scared? Like Obama less and Hillary more? In Iowa, they vote in front of each other. In New Hampshire, voters vote privately. Could it be that in private people were reluctant to go with Obama?

Something's happening here

Mary HH, Decatur, GA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:04:35 GMT

Perhaps the real story here is why were the media and the polls so wrong? You make the case for the media's premature conclusion about Obama based on the "fans" that showed up for him at a campaign stop.
Fans don't equal votes and so far in this election season, the media has been caught up in fiction instead of reality. I hope this is wake up call to all the pundits. Don't count out any group of voters.
We may like to visit the excitement of celebrity, but it doesn't mean we want to live with it for four or more years. Although some may perceive elections as popularity contests in this country, I believe
that most of us, when it truly matters, vote with our heads, not our hearts.

Something's happening here

Larry Naritelli, carlsbad, cA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:04:54 GMT

A week ago Hillary was 20 points ahead in the NH polls. She won by 3% in a state with virtually no black voters. Then she says she plans to eliminate profits at America's corporate employers. The socialist wave is rising. If she wins and does what she says we will see gas lines again at the pumps and similar lines at drug stores and health care clinics. Be careful what you wish for America, you just might get it. Congratulations Hillary, now that you've found your voice please tell us what you really stand for.

Something's happening here

Joe Desormeaux, Wimberley,Texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:04:59 GMT

Well written, Brian. Hard to believe that just about everyone got it wrong. There is a lot of animosity towards Ms. Clinton which is why the pundits got it sooo wrong. Mr. Obama seems to be their rising star, and I believe he is as well. It will be one heck of a fight to the convention between these two. May the best person win!

Something's happening here

AP — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:05:29 GMT

How can a man, who is suffering from complications of Diabetes, be so mean spirited? Chris Matthews is so evil that when he speaks he slobs at mouth. His apparent hatred toward Ms. Clinton appears personal. She should never agree to an interview with this monster. Obama should be careful too. Matthews will turn on you on a dime! He and rollie-pollie Bill Kristol(a staunch Clinton hater) are two peas in a pod. They both need prayer.

Something's happening here

Karen Marie Doherty, Nashua, New Hampshire — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:05:40 GMT

As a resident of NH for more than 30 years and a life-long New Englander, I must add one more casualty to the NH Primary (aside from the “morning after regrets” espoused by the media) and that is the good citizens of the Granite State. We have been inundated for more than six months. I could fill garbage cans with the amount of mail received in a residence shared by three registered voters. Every weekend there would be several campaigners knocking on our doors, disturbing our lives, asking who we’d be voting for. Every day there were dozens of calls – all supporters guised as pollsters asking the same thing – “who are you voting for?” I was quick to note to every pollster I spoke with that who I would vote for was my business and not theirs. The rest of the time, the nation forgets that New Hampshire, let alone New England, even exists. Coast-to-coast coverage invariably always ends at New York City. What happened is that the residents of New Hampshire finally stood up collectively and told the national media (who should really learn how to pronounce the names of the towns in this state before going on the air and looking like an even bigger fool!) that we’ve had enough of the circus they have brought to town. To my fellow Granite States, I say JOB WELL DONE! And to the media – GOOD RIDDANCE!

Something's happening here

Stephen White — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:06:17 GMT

Even your buddy O'riley got into the negative loop yesterday. ALL news media failed to report news and have decided to create it. The media is the one I fear the most today in our country.

Something's happening here

RC, Claremont, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:06:47 GMT

The Pilgrims reference was a bit much (try grandchildren of French-Canadian immigrants), but a decent piece overall.
It would appear we've come full circle: Muskie cries in front of the Union Leader in '72 and his candidacy is toast; Hillary weeps at a roundtable in '08 and her candidacy gets a bounce. Go figure.
The media and the electorate have this in common -- it's hard to apply sweeping generalizations to either one, but this much can be said about members of the media: Most don't root for any candidate and they don't root against any candidate, but THEY DO ROOT FOR A PARTICULAR STORY. Were they rooting for Hillary to fall on her backside in NH? More than likely a lot were.
So NH has saved the Clintons' political bacon twice. Well, if Hillary gets elected she'll owe us and will have to do something special -- make us our own country or something. Or maybe move Massachusetts to the Midwest. Either one would work.

Something's happening here

NO/DOE/ LEFT/CHICAGO/ILL. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:06:47 GMT

every buddy take a long deep breath and let's hope it helps. I have heard all of your thinking for almost 8yrs. I DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE. TALK IS CHEAP YOU PROVED IT. GO BY THE RECORD OR BE SILENT FOR EVERYONES SAKE

Something's happening here

Ron — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:06:56 GMT

From Bill to Hillary to us all:

i feel your pain...... (add tears here).

Something's happening here

Elizabeth, Gordon, WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:07:17 GMT

I appreciated your comments. But, speaking as a woman, I would have been more apt to have given Hillary the benefit of the doubt when she "choked up" if she had not used John Edwards' line "This is very personal for me" as part of a very smooth upbeat presentation that immediately followed.

Something's happening here

RSM, FtW, Texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:07:41 GMT

Brian: Beautifully written. Well placed words, carefully structured sentences, and beautiful weaving of narrative!

Something's happening here

Jack Smith — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:07:43 GMT

GIVE ME A BREAK. One win does not a candidate make. YOU ALL WILL EAT YOUR OVERSIZED EGO WORDS> HAHAHAHA... yes it was a shock, but so it will be when you are sitting their with your mouth open when she loses the BIG STATES!!

Something's happening here

JG a member of the experienced generation; Roswell, GA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:08:56 GMT

un Reality television, the ugly step sister to Reality television--produced by and STARRING the media! Shame on you! My compliments to Tom Brokaw for his comments while speaking with Chris Matthews, on journalism 101, objectively report the FACTS, oh we miss you so, Tom! To Chris Matthews, because NBC endorsed you by giving you a spot in their line-up, I gave you a chance and was a viewer. Maybe the Deal Or No Deal producers will go with males to open the suitcases, how do you look topless? Brian, I hope you will take the lead on your broadcast tonight to address just what happened within the circle of broadcasters the last several days and mention that there are lesson to be learned.

Something's happening here

NO/DOE/ LEFT/CHICAGO/ILL. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:09:40 GMT

Something's happening here

NO/DOE/ LEFT/CHICAGO/ILL. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:09:41 GMT

Something's happening here

NO/DOE/ LEFT/CHICAGO/ILL. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:09:41 GMT

Something's happening here

StopNThink, Houston, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:09:50 GMT

Good work, Brian. As an avid MSNBC viewer, I am now SICK of biased Clinton bashing by Chris Matthews et al. So much so, that I am turning more frequently to CNN so I don't have to be offended. My news should be limited to reporting - not a personal opinion. I quick Tucker long ago because he is so offensive and arrogant. Omit "news" from the station's title and replace with "opinions". MSNBC, which used to be my favorite, may soon be my ex if they don't change their tune.

Something's happening here

M. Pouliot, Mesa, AZ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:09:58 GMT

It's one thing to not know you're messing up and continuing along the old approach but what will the press do now that they've heard from the people that their biases are frustrating especially those who are supposedly paid to be objective rather than "entertaining". IT's time for a change with reporting, we don't need your opinions, what we nedd is a balanced approach to news reporting not only in politics but everywhere. If the press can't get it right then look for other work where credibility is not as important!

Something's happening here

Lisa, Maine — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:10:24 GMT

Brian, a well written piece, but I am not ready to accept an apology from the so-called news media. I agree with other posters who say that members of the news media need to report the news not predict it. I'm an undecided, probably Democratic, voter in Maine. As a well-informed citizen, I desperately want a chance to vote for someone and to feel like I had some sort of say in a true race. You all tried to squelch that opportunity by getting so caught up in the "historic moment" of the country electing an African-American president. Not only did you have Sen. Obama for the Democratic nominee, you had him for president. Please stop doing that and let this thing take its own course.

Something's happening here

happy in texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:10:29 GMT

I,too, enjoyed the article. The media has been brutal towards Hillary and they have lost a tremendous amount of credibility with me. I'm glad they were made to look like the bias idiots they are. I'm so glad Hillary won last night. Her win along with John McCains shows that EXPERIENCE does matter. I think Barack is a great orator and none of the other candidates are even close to him in that regard but I think the speeches aren't enough. We are electing someone to the highest office in the land and that person is going to have to deal with enormous problems (there will not be a honeymoon period) and I don't believe our country can take a chance on Him no matter how much he tries to inspire us to do so. Finally, I wish the "love fest" by the media of Barack's speeches would stop. They are making me sick. Enough already. Bill Clinton was right when he said the coverage is like a big fairytale. Let's see some substance.

Something's happening here

happy in texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:10:28 GMT

Something's happening here

Carol Sandford — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:10:38 GMT

Brian - I really miss Peter Jennings. Your piece on the New Hampshire race has made you my new favorite News Anchor. Excellent journalism.
Kind Regards Carol Sandford

Something's happening here

dee cani washington dc — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:11:13 GMT

Thank you, Brian, for the courtesy of showing respect to those of us who are seriously committed to following the political process, as students and as citizens. I've been without a tv for 3-4 years, and had a chance to watch the returns last night. I was shocked by how cynical and hostile Chris Matthews (whom I used to enjoy) has become,
and by how no one among these 'news professionals" is disciplined in reacting

If they think it, they say it, as if it is true. What have they done to establish themselves as the
'judges of what's what,' beyond questioning, for the rest of us? McCain's speech, which I found touchingly awkward but so sincere, was the butt of sneering and dismissal. Hillary's win was reduced to the search for a single factor that caused it, not the quite- complex mix of factors that actually produced it.

Raised in the times when the actual news was reported, rather than the opinions of the reporters, I am saddened and frightened by the lack of maturity, discipline and true intelligence (rather than quick-wittedness) among the pundits; in this light, I really appreciate your
analysis.

Something's happening here

Matthew P., Seattle, WA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:11:29 GMT

Journalism these days absolutely stinks. You guys don't report the news that matters to the people, you report news that matters to the ratings. If a piece about Obama might draw more viewers than a piece about Clinton--your network is going to err on the side of ratings. Ratings=$$$ and more value to the shareholders of your parent company (GE in your case). It isn't just NBC, it's all the other news outlets as well--even the local ones. Thank GOD for the Internet, where I can draw on more than one source to get past the slant and get more toward the actual story.

Something's happening here

Terry Phoenix, AZ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:11:30 GMT

I hope most of you have read the book Biased,

Now stand in front of the news cameras and tell me that you truthfully report the news without putting your spin on it. Funny how news commentators and liars go together, just like politicans and we look back and wonder why things happened. If we don't know what the truth is then where will it end. It is time for the people to get rid of the dirty politics in Washington, put new people in and get rid of these news broadcasters cause your never going to get the truth. You get what they want you to hear.

Something's happening here

NO/DOE/ LEFT/CHICAGO/ILL. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:12:16 GMT

Something's happening here

Michael MacDonald, Reno, Nv — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:13:44 GMT

Perhaps you and the other news pundits wouldn't have egg on your collective faces if you went back to reporting the news rather than trying to create the news. You had Hillary buried and done for this election, but while you and others were reading her eulogy, she had the audacity to rise from the grave. Now the pundits are saying it is over for Romney, Edwards, and Guiliani. If you keep this up, the election is going to be populated by zombies, the walking dead.

Something's happening here

Brian Quinn, Delafield, WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:14:07 GMT

THERE IS NO BRADLEY EFFECT! Obama won white men and rural voters. If that's not where you'd expect to see it, where then?

Folks, he lost fair and square.

Something's happening here

Pat Murphy, Ann Arbor — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:14:10 GMT

Hillary's "tearing up" moment in N.H. reminded me of Bill Clinton biting his lower lip and declaring "I feel your pain." (Not to mention "I did not have sex with that woman.") Both Clintons are experts at acting in the political arena. I didn't buy Hillary's theatrics, and I'm sorry that the New Hampshire voters and ALL the press did.

Something's happening here

JD, Illinois — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:14:43 GMT

A very insightful article. It seems, as one writer wrote, that there is a pattern that is not necessarily healthy---Bush, Clinton, Bush... Let's see, if we elct this Clinton, that will give Jeb the opportunity to try and by the time he gets out of office, Chelsea should just about be ready.

Something's happening here

Mark Brumback, Madeira Beach, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:15:02 GMT

What a great article that makes several great observations. I am incresingly confounded by the election polling since the presidential election of 2000. Polls create drama, but also complacency. I always wonder how many people fail to vote because pre-election polls indicate an outcome that will render their vote useless. Whatever the reason we keeping seeing results opposite what the polls said would happen, I think it is a good thing. The media may take a hit when it happens, but the populace should be buoyed. We all count and we all should have our say in the process. As for the title of this article, maybe something IS happening here. Not just the rise of Obama, but the awakening of America. Maybe turnout has been so high because people are realizing we have got to make this government more functional and responsive to the challenges we face. Whether or not Obama wins the nomination or not, his effect on America already is profound. He has made so many people realize that we can and should do better. Maybe something is happening here.

Something's happening here

Richard Battin, Chicago, Ill. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:15:41 GMT

Enjoyed the piece, but you're wrong about New Hampshire rewarding Hillary and her husband in the "same way." Unlike his wife, Bill Clinton didn't win the Democratic New Hampshire primary in 1992, but his strong finish still conjured the "comeback kid" image that took him all the way to the White House.

Something's happening here

Tomza — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:16:10 GMT

Ben Stein, of all people, noted on Kudlow's MSNBC show that, in the not so distant past, all serious candidates developed large policy books for the press and the public that explained their stance on the key issues of the day. The books were also tweeked to reflect regional concerns--i.e., in farm states they discussed things like parity. Does anyone do that anymore? If not, it's a shame because we simply don't know what we're getting from anyone--not just Obama. Anyone. For example, if recession is upon us, what do these guys and gal plan to do about monetary policy--and the economy in general? What do any of them think about China or wholesale outsourcing--and how to they plan to deal with them? About global warming? How about food policy? Haven't Barack and Hillary (or their seconds) been noticing the big uptick in the price of commodities like wheat? Isn't that a major concern? During the N.H. debate, it sounded like Obama and several others think we can simply manipulate Pakistani politics with strong talk and threats of holding back aid. Those are old ideas and they may not work if Pakistan begins to fall apart. What then? Do we rush in and protect the nukes? Do we ask the Brits and the rest of Europe to do their part? Instead of covering the horse race, the press ought to be asking the hard questions. And if their pundits and reporters aren't up on the complexities of the pressing issues of the day, maybe it would be a good idea to hire some new pundits and reporters who are.

Something's happening here

Al Jolsen, Mobile, Alabama — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:16:36 GMT

Great piece Mr. Williams. However, there is one significant part missing from your peice. I believe a huge part of the issue was that "white" folks in New Hampshire were not going to vote "black" just because there brethern in Iowa had done so earlier or the media proclaimed a black man the pre-vote winner. What happened in Iowa was one for the ages. What happened in New Hampshire was a step back to a time when inequality was the norm and democracy was simply a notion for "white" folks to ponder. New Hampshire spoke alright. They told "white" lies to the pollsters in order to make idealists feel the humiliation of a victory lost which was never won to begin with. They knew what they were doing all along. It is unfortunately written into the fabric of this country. "White" folks in New Hampshire simply demonstrated emphatically that they are part of the ruling class of this country, rich, middle class, or poor, and that the naive "white" folks in Iowa who got caught up in history, ideals, and hope really needed to be put back in their place.

Something's happening here

Trudy Enderle, Cincinnati, Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:16:48 GMT

I agree with the comment that the news media should
"report" the news and not try to slant the facts of the situation to influence us as to what the "reporter" wants us to see. We've had politicians doing that for too long. Don't tell us what to think. WE have elections in which to show our opinions, and each ONE of us gets to share our opinion on our selection. The last 10% of my projected candidate selection went to Ms. Rodham-Clinton just because of the show of weariness in her voice as this was an honest reaction, and angered to the view that she was a loser for doing so. Shame on you. I am from the midwest.

Something's happening here

Martha Kitchens — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:17:09 GMT

Please, PLEASE stop with the misinterpretations of the Iowa and New Hampshire voters, particularly women. This applies to Tim Russert in spades. For example, I am a woman. I am 60. I am an independent. I don't yet know how I'm going to vote in the upcoming elections. I am also a Ph.D. in the behavioral sciences. You people misread the Iowa vote, and, as a result, you are misreading the New Hampshire votes. The vote in Iowa was SIMPLY NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF ENOUGH PEOPLE TO GENERALIZE FROM IT. The "sample", if you will, was small, and definitionally self-selected.( i.e., the nature of 'caucus' voting results in that sort of sample) That is one of the worst bases for projecting the future that can exist. Nonetheless, Tim Russert, who has been "tearing down" whoever was the front runner in any of the campaigns, typically overreacted by overreading the fact that one candidate, Sen. Clinton, ( whom I notice he always calls Hillary or Mrs., hardly ever Sen., her proper title) did NOT get the bulk of the "women's" vote...thereby assuming that the strength of the Clinton campaign prior to the Iowa caucus, which he had always attributed to women's 'solidarity', had vanished. If you actually look at all the exit poll results, you might note that the overwhelming majority of the Clinton vote in New Hampshire was based on experience, not gender. I'm afraid some analytic bias shows up in Russert's analyses pretty frequently. Even though I am no fan of Clinton ( I live in South Texas), I am a well educated older woman who fears the lack of experience that Obama brings to the table. Might it be the case that lotsof older women value experience more than youth and good looks and great speechmaking? I don't want Clinton to be the nominee, much less the president. As an independent voter, I would like to see a good race between two qualified candidates, though, and if that ends up being Clinton and McCain in the general election, I think the American people will be winners. Thank you

Something's happening here

Jane, Crystal Falls, Mi. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:17:13 GMT

The reason Hillary won is that the media made women mad. And I am not just talking about the last 48 hours. It got to the point over the last several months that I haven't even been able to watch Chris Matthews. Hillary has been treated extremely unfairly while Obama and Edwards were getting a free ride. I think we need more women in the media.

Something's happening here

CKane, NYC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:18:11 GMT

As a stickler for the English language, I have to ask that if Mr. McCain and Mrs. Clinton did not have "mutual respect for each other," for whom, then, would they have it?

Something's happening here

Trina, Baltimore, MD — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:19:01 GMT

Beautifully written. As an african american woman, I am torn between both of these history making candidates. They each have so so much to offer that will impact and move this country from out of the muck and mire where it now resides. It is a new day, and I'm am excitied and invigorated to see history playing out before my eyes. This campaign has captured the attention of this county. I thank Hilliary and Obama for a new spirit for change that is enveloping this country. Who would have thought that there would be a time when a woman and a black man would run for president in the same election and both would have the greatest potential to win and leave a slew of old white men in the dust.

I haven't made up my mind as yet to which candidate I will choose and probably won't until I enter the voting booth. We are in a different place. One thing I know is whichever one receives my vote will because I feel that they will be the best candidate and that they will make a difference. Tears, skin color nor popular opinion will determine who I choose. This is a great time for this country. So wake up everyone who wants to throw darts or try to be cute and clever with their cynical remarks.

Clinton or Obama spells change in every which way form or fashion. And its going to happen regardless of what the polls or the pundits say. For the first time in a long time, I feel good about where this country is going.

Something's happening here

Julie Washington — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:19:12 GMT

In Tuesday evening's New Hampshire primary results, Clinton and her special interest groups won tonight over the newly established party of the people.

The people of New Hampshire with record turn out stood in long lines to vote and the exit polls were not wrong and the pollster were not wrong, by all rights, Obama should have won New Hampshire, but the special interest money groups pulled another rabbit out of their hat and gave the victory to Clinton. The earlier results, where paper ballots were being used, the victory went to Obama in a very large margin, where voting machines were used most likely without paper trails, Clinton got the victory. This same scenario happened to Gore and Kerry. The exit polls and pollsters saying one thing and the machines saying another. That is why people cannot trust their government, and until we have voting machines that are fool proof and tamper proof and go back to elections with paper ballots, like in Iowa, we cannot really trust our election results. Iowa pollsters had it right because thier voting system is done with paper ballots and in the light of day! It is not because white America is lying to the pollsters when it comes to an African American candidate.

On the eve of the election, Hillary played her poor me, self-pity act (her so-called authentic moment) and Media complicit in this charade, played this teary-eyed Hillary over and over again to get out the "sympathy vote", which she did, but neglecting the air the piece right afterwards in which she lashes out at Barack Obama . This policy blunder will be huge ammonition for the Republicans if she wins the nomination. They will ask: How can she deal with the critical issues facing us today This "teary-eyed" piece will be aired over and over again in campaign commercials; citing her as to weak and to unstable to lead the country. A big mistake for her!

Change is hard, but Senator Obama will continue on with his message of hope and change. The special interst groups do not want to give up their power and they will do everything they can to keep power in their hands and out of the people's hands. Deciding who to back, be it Republican or Democrat as long as they serve their ends. Eventually the people will win and we will keep on fighting.

President Clinton, a man supposedly of honor, distorted and took out of context words Senator Obama's spoke at the 2004 Democratic Convention about his stance on the Iraq war. Do we really want people like that in the White House who will lie and distort for their own selfish gains? Or do we want a man of goodwill and integrity in the White House a man more concerned about you than himself. It is no easy to task for a man to risk his life for you because he answers the call to make America better and to take it to a higher ground.

When President Clinton achieved his Presidency, he took a lot of Democrats down. They had record losses in both the Senate and the Congress and the tone of Washington, D.C, was divisive and nasty, and a Hillary Presidency will continue this same trend, and we will have lost our moment to come together as one.

Much is at stake, we are at a crossroads. Change is hard because the media are in their pockets and the voting machines cannot be trusted. We can only HOPE! God bless this country!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Something's happening here

June, Greens Farms, CT — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:19:37 GMT

Thank you for this excellent piece. Could it be that those years in Elmira added the je ne se quoi to your perspective! (a former native native)

Something's happening here

Kathleen, IA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:19:40 GMT

What a beautifully penned article, Brian. Thank you for that!

Something's happening here

njmhw — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:20:47 GMT

So good to see the vote in New Hampshire go to Hillary. I like to watch MSNBC BUT for several weeks have felt like I had been watching a Fox news channel. Scarborough and Matthews have been so hyper and angry about Hillary. Not to mention Tucker which I do not watch at all now. What is wrong with these people that they pick on one or two people. I would like them to discuss all the candidates and tell of each of their issues and stay neutral. THANKS to Tom Brokaw for telling Matthews on two occassions to basically start acting like true journalists. But Matthews and his HA did not seem to get the message. Seems like we need people like Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather, hmmm people with experience!!!! that have a better perspective. We need a better understanding with much less bias reporting of the real world of living and economy in this great country. They need to talk to middle America only to see how hard it is to make a living today. They have no clue.

Something's happening here

Elaine, Chicago — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:21:29 GMT

Well put, Brian. Now please use your influence to get MSNBC to keep Chris Matthews in his regular shock jock corner and return the election coverage to serious news people. Please.

Something's happening here

JA CARTER — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:22:14 GMT

IT IS TIME THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE STOP LETTING THE MEDIA TELL THEM WHAT TO DO AND HOW TO THINK-- THEIR JOB IS TO REPORT THE NEWS -NOT TO DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT IT TO BE--
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO DO THEIR OWN HOMEWORK AND THEN VOTE FOR THE PERSON THEY THINK IS THE BEST PERSON FOR THE JOB --
ALSO PEOPLE WHO LET A CERTAIN FEMALE TV STAR TELL THEM HOW TO VOTE -NEED TO WAKE UP AND CHECK OUT HOW MUCH THEY ARE PAYING FOR GAS --FOOD -ETC-- - PAY ATTENTION -- SINCE WHEN DOES A BILLIONAIRE KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON IN MIDDLE AMERICAN --

Something's happening here

Anthony, Green Bay, WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:22:19 GMT

Brian - Thanks for the "P.S. John McCain won too" article.

Something's happening here

Dave, Westfield, Mass. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:22:27 GMT

The most important point Brian makes is that we shouldn't judge too quickly. The small populations of Iowa and New Hampshire should not single-handedly determine our candidates.

In this era of immediacy, between 24-hour news networks and the internet, perhaps we should re-think our primary process, and have a "Super Tuesday" that starts the political season, and lets a much greater number of people determine who our 'best' candidates are.

A good candidate should not be derailed, simply because he or she does not appeal to Iowa.

Something's happening here

Becky Fuller, St. Louis, MO — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:23:24 GMT

Seems Greg Reamy, Gloria Rouse and many others agree with what I have known for awhile. I sent Chris (Matthews) a rather harsh email weeks ago when his male sexist and chauvanistic remarks became all too apparent and blatant for me as a PROUD American to accept!!!!
Funny how irrelevant talking heads like Joe S and others become and start blowing in the wind..... spouting their own passive brand of chauvanism and sexism. As I told Chris, he had better take a long hard look in the mirror; WE don't find his prejudiced deep seated views and opinions any more acceptable than others found those of anyone else, Imas included. Do the executives at NBC hear this I wonder; what % of females are there???
THANK YOU BRIAN for your insight, intelligence and ability.

Something's happening here

Linda, Kansas City, KS — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:23:23 GMT

I thank you for your candor in admitting your error as well as for the rest of the media. (Is this in itself a contradiction to your article?) It seems (as you said) that in a few weeks you will forget this valuable lesson! You obviously didn't remember the major error of the reporting done in predicting the last Presidential race. I hope I live long enough to see the media let the American people think and act for themselves rather than trying to continuously tell us how and why it happened and more importantly what is going to happen!!! The media cover of 24/7 has brought this on ... perhaps someday all this 'real time coverage' and 'make believe assumptions' will stop. The media can't predict the weather accurately all the time (even with all your gadgets), so why do you think you can predict the emotions and actions of people?

Something's happening here

Brent Armstrong — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:23:59 GMT

So let me get this straight. The same media that got this so wrong is now going to explain to us why they got it so wrong. Sorry. I'm not going to read the explanation. I've already wasted too much time reading the media reports to stay informed only to learn that you guys don't really know any more than the rest of us. All of you have lost credibility with me.

Something's happening here

Lynette, NYC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:24:16 GMT

I am happy to see Brian that you have acknowledged the less than impartial reporting by some of your colleagues, as your predecessor Tom Brokaw did as well last night on air, socking it to both Chris MAtthews ( who really ought to be ashamed of himself, you would think he was trying to get on the obama ticket the way he vilifies Clinton) and Keith Oberman as they refused to admit that Hillary won. They kept saying what about Dartmouth until they crunched the numbers and realized it was a no go for their boy. Thanks again Brian.

Something's happening here

J. Florez Sugar City, Colorado — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:24:36 GMT

It's all right because its all white. There is change in today's generation but there is no growth. We should look at starting new traditions. Not the same herd mentality.

Something's happening here

Brian Williams-Norgaard, Grand Prairie, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:25:05 GMT

Mr. Williams,

Well written piece. One clarification: Hillary "expressed" her emotions; she did not "lose control" of them. I'm afraid you are feeding into longstanding stereotypes that "women" who choke up "lose control" of their emotions and "men" who choke up are "man enough" to show their emotions. Well-balanced leaders are capable of tapping into a range of emotions and occasionally expressing those emotions to the people whom they lead. It reminds people that leaders (political or otherwise) are as human as you or I. As a reporter whom I'm confident strives for objectivity, please help to dispel these lingering stereotypes and call Hillary's moment what it really was: an "expression" of emotion. Keep up the good work.

Something's happening here

Michael Ajayi, Bolingbrook, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:25:37 GMT

Greg Reamy said it right, Chris Matthews does have hatred for the Clintons. I am very glad that Hillary won, and hopefully the pundits can stop predicting garbage.

Something's happening here

jackie Page, Sulphur Springs, Tx — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:26:23 GMT

you know as far back as I can remember, the news media one way or another has picked our Leaders. It is time the public has a say in who becomes President. The press needs to back up, they do not run the world much as they would like to. Each person in our nation as a say. Black, white, or green, it is our choice.

Something's happening here

M Hagan — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:27:32 GMT

Reading Brian William's apology renewed a portion of my trust in the major news networks. New Hampshire, thank you for making up your own minds rather than follow the predictions of those who believe they had Hillary's political future in their own crystal ball.

Now maybe, Chris Matthew's palpable contempt for anything Clinton should be harnessed or silenced. I'm not interested in his personal favorites and he should voice his endorsement for his candidate at the voting booth, just like everyone else.

Something's happening here

Nick Karavedas, Twin Falls, Idaho — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:28:25 GMT

The notion that Hilary won becuase freedom loving, don't tell me what to think New Englanders, got tired of it all is just plain silly in my opinion. She had been the front-runner for MONTHS...and she only won by 2-3% people...come on now. Women, women, women..."it's the women stupid" that's what put here over the top. She is in serious trouble come South Carolina, Nevada.

Something's happening here

Leslene — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:29:49 GMT

It is astounding to me that people don't seem to understand what is going on, especially with the media. Hillary is making herstory--that is, she is challenging the good old boys club. Men and the media both are seriously afraid of women's power. The patriarchal paradigm is crumbling, folks. Of course the media is going to slant towards men, even if that means an African American. No woman in politics with only 2 years experience would have made it as far as Obama. And, let us not forget, black men got the vote before women. Say good-bye to the boys' club, and get on board with real change... it is women who will restore us to sanity; it is women who will restore us to health and it is women who will end war. For 5000 years men have been running things, and have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that they can't do it. Bringing us to the brink of extinction is not life-affirming, and certainly doesn't do anything for our children except scare them to death. You want change? Elect women.

Something's happening here

Moon, Chicago — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:29:55 GMT

Can we also end the "Maybe the people don't want 28 years of Bush and Clinton Presidencies" statements? What the people don't want is another Bush Presidency, both of which were failures. I don't think anybody in 2008 would mind going back to the first Clinton administration, warts and all.

And stop deifying "Change" - OF COURSE, every candidate is for change - we just have arguably the worst administration in history. Even the GOP candidates are crying out for change and they still nominally support Bush. It's not a big deal to want change from the worst administration ever!

Something's happening here

Yele Akinsanya, Plymouth, Minnesota — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:30:14 GMT

Brian:

I now realize why you are so liked as an anchor person. You are the best. Keep up the resounding spirit of a thoughtful and reflective journalist.

Something's happening here

Martha Dutro, Paradise, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:30:15 GMT

I was incredulous when Obama won in Iowa. But then I looked at the number of voters and realized that they are not speaking for America. I have been for Clinton since the beginning because of I feel she is sincere and was not swayed by the emotions on Monday. I felt it was heartfelt on her part and real.

Something's happening here

B Jen-Nohr, Milwaukee, WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:30:35 GMT

It's refreshing to see this. As an old political hack from days gone by I can tell you that one restricted access ballot(a/k/a "caucus) in a farm state does not make a trend or even "Big Mo." Political success is not a one time event but a succession of steps. The media and the talking heads made this into a premature coronation, in part I think to be the "first" to make the call. Mathews ought not ever underestimate Hillary or the voting public; we are not all swayed by instant analysis.

Something's happening here

Justin, Buffalo, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:31:17 GMT

The error made, yet again, by the media reporting only polling data in NH and concluding the result to be certain, only exemplifies the need for the media to STOP reporting the "horse race" and to begin reporting on the candidates. We wonder why Americans know little about candidates, but know a great deal about the polls before an election, and that is becuase the media is reporting on the wrong thing. Stop trying to predict elections; instead start reporting on elections and candidates.

Something's happening here

KAZ, St. Louis, MO — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:31:57 GMT

It's naive to refer to Hillary and Bill as both being given a win in New Hampshire. Bill was /defeated/ in NH. Yes, he spun it as a "win", calling himself "the comeback kid", but it was just that; spin. It's a shame that the media, as here, was gullible enough to fall for it.

Their credulity is also illustrated by the acceptance of so many that Hillary's ridiculous, mostly-free-of-actual-tears choking-up act. In the unlikely event that NH voters actually fell for it, one might be tempted to blame the fact that the talking heads didn't go after it the way they (correctly) did the staged wife phone calls, staged kisses and lovey eyes, et cetera, of candidates and their mates.

But the third and most embarassing example of the media's gullibility is the "surprise" over Clinton's narrow victory.

Until a week ago, it was (correctly) understood that Hillary had the stronger engine and establishment in New Hampshire. Actual calm, rational analysts reminded people of this after Iowa. It was still Hillary's race to lose. And, of course, New Hampshire voters are generally /repelled/ by Iowa's results, so Obama's win there did NOT magically change any momentum.

In fact, the momentum change was the incompetent media and pundits, forgetting that Iowa rarely has any effect on, or even reflection of, the outcome of the overall nomination campaign. Other than sometimes pushing New Hampshire to vote AGAINST what happened in Iowa.

The story, now, should be how Clinton won by a frighteningly narrow margin, demonstrating MORE momentum gained by Obama.

But the media fooled itself. As demonstrated by this article's complete detachment from reality.

Something's happening here

Elizabeth Craig — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:32:04 GMT

Wow! A news commentator who admits they were wrong. He is the only one and as for Chris Matthews stating that white people speak with forked tongue,isn't he white or pink or whatever? Who cares about color except the news media who like to fan any kind of sensational emtioms they can. No matter who it hurts, destroys or injuries, it is okay for them to be arrogant, demeaning and pandering. Well, it isn't. The voters are sick of your biased attempts to decide for us who we will vote for. Why not just admit it! More people liked Hilliary than Obama. Gosh, does this mean she could be "likable"!

Something's happening here

Cathy Collier, Fredericksburg, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:32:40 GMT

Thank you for an insightful piece that sidestepped the cynicism. It's clear that you know these people as human beings not just political figures.

Something's happening here

Tim Halloran, Los Angeles, California — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:32:47 GMT

Agreed Greg, much of this result can be attributed to the smug slobbering Chris Matthews. It was awesome to see his ashen grey face and stunned silence as the results were being reported and he realized that his worst nightmare was coming true. Priceless!

Great piece, Brian.

Something's happening here

GH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:32:56 GMT

As I recall, until recently Senator Clinton was projected to have the lead in NH. I would suggest to not follow the spin doctoring that pins a "comeback kid" name plate on the Senator that the media can adore.

A strong candidate for the presidency does not need to resort to a contrived / planned crying session. We already know the Senator plants questions in the crowd anyway with a response also already practiced. Do we want a president that is going to cry in front of the Presidents of Russia and Iran?

Something's happening here

Luis, New York, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:33:10 GMT

I believed Clinton would win in New Hampshire simply because the voters there would not want to be seen as jumping on a bandwagon that started in Iowa. I think things started to trun at the debate on Saturday, when Obama and Edwards double-teamed Clinton. I think New Hampshire voters saw that, and sympathized with Clinton. then Monday's "breakdown" moment, the most over--publicized moment of this election cycle, worked to her benefit. Independents who told pollsters they were going for Obama went in and voted for McCain. I say all of this is wonderful news for the electorate. This is an election, not a coronation process, and these candidates should have to convince voters all over the country of their worth.

Something's happening here

Ahmed Soliman, Maple Shade, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:33:26 GMT

What Brian says about Hillary's tears helping her take New Hampshire is an accurate analysis. But so is this: Hillary can't keep crying her way to the White House. Round 2 went to Hillary, but in the long run it's Obama who has all the necessary tools to win this nomination.

Something's happening here

GR, Phoenix, Az — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:33:29 GMT

Tom Brokaw is right on the money. His is an astute observation from an ‘experienced’ journalist offered to those largely younger self important journalists who desire to see themselves as news makers rather than as workmanlike reporters of the news.

The cult of celebrity politics just got dumped in the ditch by the thoughtful patriotic voters of New Hampshire who did America a great service yesterday.

Chris Matthews, Tim Russert and others like them have lost all credibility and they should seek other employment for they are no friends of a vibrant democracy - of the people by the people and for the people.

Something's happening here

Michael Rathberger, LaPorte, IN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:33:49 GMT

Yeah, just what I want for President. When the going gets tough, "emotions" show. That'll be great for negotiations, maybe if she lets her emotions show, the Iranian President will stop with his proliferation of nuclear weapons. Give me a break. Keep the warm and fuzzies there Brian, she'd be a joke on the world stage, and all the foreign leaders would know it. When the going gets tough, Hillary cries and Brian thinks it's great. Yeah, who's he voting for this election? Not Obama that's for sure...

Something's happening here

Ahmed Soliman, Maple Shade, NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:34:16 GMT

Something's happening here

Lisa Hayden, Winchester, VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:34:19 GMT

I cast no blame, on the News media that was what those polled response to questionnaires were. I do say that if NH residents really think that SEN Clinton has a chance in beating any REP candidate this election year they are crazy. Sen. Clinton's family has too much bad history and it's too soon for folks to forget the manner in which her husband Pres. Clinton left office-in shame.

The Democrats need someone who can pull Republican voters to their side and we all know it is not SEN Clinton. Desire is not enough, SEN Obama has a better chance of pulling Republican voters to his side, he doesn't have the baggage, he flesh, Christian, strong family values, and he looks like the bridge between two worlds.

No, news media didn't get it wrong, NH women fell for the emotional demonstration of the SEN, and instead of thinking for themselves they were lead by emotion. I am a woman, I this is easily done, my plea to all women, is not to vote for SEN Clinton because she is a woman, but vote for someone who can win, and beat any Republican candidate.

I tell you, SEN Obama, said it before, the Republicans want SEN Clinton to win, because they know as long as she's on the ballot, she wont pull the conservative-Republicans and so they will win, it wouldn't matter who runs against her they will win.

I send a warning to all voters Republicans and Democrats, if you want real change it's not SEN Clinton, but SEN Obama

Something's happening here

Doug, Madison, WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:36:04 GMT

Nicely said Brian. I do have to correct something you said. You said that New Hampshire was also good to Bill Clinton in 1992 when in fact he lost to Paul Tsongas. It was later that he became the "Comeback Kid".

Something's happening here

Charlie Shaffer, Springfield, Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:36:26 GMT

I read your comments Brian. Now you are hinting that Mrs. Clinton is too weak by suggesting she almost shed tears as you did say about her daughter. None of you media have any reason to be trusted except one and that is Charlie Gibson who I put right up there with Walter Cronkite. The media has too much power and the people should realize it.

Something's happening here

Alma Ranker — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:36:37 GMT

GO HILLARY, AS I SAT FOR DAYS LOOKING AND LISTENING TO ALL OF THE MEDIA COUNTING HILLARY OUT,SHAME ON YOU ASSUMMING THAT WE THE PEOPLE CANT MAKE UP OUR OWN MINDS,THANK YOU NEW HAMPSHIRE FOR PROVING THEM WRONG!I LISTEN TO YOU ALL JUMP ON THE OBAMA BANDWAGON AND EVEN GO AS FAR AS PUTTING ON THE OBAMA GIRL AS NEWS, I HOPE NOW YOU ALL WILL REPORT WHAT IS REALLY IMPORTANT ON THE NEWS, LIKE THE ECONOMY, THE WAR AND YES THE MIDDEL CLASS THAT YOU ALL SEEM TO FORGET, YES CHANGE IS GOOD BUT WITH CHANGE SOMETIMES EXPERIECES IS JUST AS IMPORTANT THANK YOU, SHAME ON YOU ALL TO THINK THAT IT REALLY TOOK A SHED OF TEAR THAT GAVE HER THE VOTE YOU ALL IN THE MEDIA MADE HER LOOK AS THOUGH SHE WAS A HEARTLESS ROBOTIC WOMEN,ONCE AGAIN THANK YOU CHRIS MATTHEWS FOR YOUR PART IN THIS ALONG WITH THE OTHER MIDEA PUNDITS CAN WE GET TO THE REAL RACE NOW AND ISSUES.

Something's happening here

Ruth, Northbrook, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:36:48 GMT

The media may have counted out both Hillary and McCain, but watching and experiencing the political process in a living room is a very different thing that trying to be a journalist and having to express an opinion or what they think the people's opinions are.

Hillary and McCain are both well respected people who have been very involved in both defined and undefined ways for decades. It's hard for the people not to take them seriously whether they are currently voting for them or not.

And frankly the polls only reflect who is taking the polls and who is giving the polls on any given day. No matter what poll science is behind a poll, it's still a very small sampling, and even in my own neighborhood we would have as many opinions as there are people.

I never count out Hillary though I would bristle at the idea of actually voting for her.

I never count out John McCain because though we all want to be out of the war, many of us still believe he has a very unique point of view in that this war was never carried out effectively and could never get the job done, resulting in what has happened.

He has firsthand experience with war, both as a soldier and as an officer. He knows what's going on in a way that Pres. Bush could never understand and could be operating on guilt that he evaded service and is trying too hard to make up for it by going to war and fighting vicariously through the lives of others.

Never count out serious candidates. They have had stature in the eyes of the American people for years. It will always be a see-saw between inspiration-confidence and fear-protection. It will depend on the mood of the people on election day in each state. That's who will get the vote.

Something's happening here

Pablo, Olympia Wa — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:36:55 GMT

WAKE UP AMERICA.
Hillary proved that her tears are more persuasive than her ideas. She canno't unite this country and it would not suprised me if the question was planted like it has been planted before by her staff. The sad part is that women fell for it and gave her the vote there is nothing else that needs to be say about analyzing the results that is the reason she won. If the tears were real it would have made more sense for her to cry last night while she was doing her victory speech since that was more of an emotional momment.

Something's happening here

Norm Valdez , Albuquerque New Mexico — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:37:02 GMT

Quote Its sad, how ones media is so screwed up and filled with ideals...of their own .. I am a proud supporter of Hillary Clinton and know she can win the President of U.S.. People need to understand what is at stakes .. Mr Bush screwed up 8 years of something good for America... We need to start over and what better person than Mrs Hillary Clinton.... We need to support our FIRST new woman President!! Bless the Lord , Norm Valdez

Something's happening here

Taty, New York,NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:37:10 GMT

Well written piece. I agree 100%. I will add that the blue suit has to "change".She looked so much better with the suit she wore for her accepting speech.

Something's happening here

Anne Daniels, Lake City, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:37:18 GMT

I believe this is the very first time I read an news article like yours. I watched the particular newscast from you on Obama and I was somewhat set apart by the assumption that he would win hands down. I think that your article made more than up for the media shortfall of assumption. Hillary Clinton showed real emotion and maybe it would not hurt the other candidates to let go from the heart every now and then. People pumped themselves up for Obama, only to let themselves be cast down.

Something's happening here

Norm Valdez , Albuquerque New Mexico — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:37:49 GMT

Something's happening here

Leslie Staas, New Braunfels, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:39:32 GMT

I am glad that the polls and the media were wrong, I have to say I wish they had been wrong and it was John Edwards who came out ahead last night but at least maybe now they'll stop going on about the Obama wave and how there is no stopping it. I am tired of hearing and reading Obama this and Hillary that - the media needs to give equal time and they are not.
We in Texas don't vote till March 5 - does it even matter - the way the media goes on it does not. We have had one primary and one caucus - could we stop and give more than half of 1% of the country some say in the outcome of this - we have the right to have our say and I am very tired of feeling like this will be all over before half the country has a chance to vote. Frankly that is what happened with Kerry and look where that got us.
I would ask all Democrats, all Americans, to take a deep breath - read the canidates info and vote what you believe not what the media hypes.

Something's happening here

dave dellett — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:39:49 GMT

I want to be clear on this...MSNBC coverage as well as others set this country back 25 years when they suggested that last night's results were perhaps a "Tom Bradly" moment.

Instead of suggesting race as being a potential issue and making it a sensationalistic ratings boost, why not try to be a little more analytical.

I suggested to my wife very simply that the independent voter in New Hampshire consider their vote a valued commodity. With all of the polls suggesting that Barack had all but sealed a double digit win over Hillary and that McCain may be in trouble if the independent vote swings to Obama, the independent voter decided to vote in the Republican primary because that is where their vote could make the most difference.

But instead you all jumped back on the race wagon...and suggested that people being polled were lying and once they got behind the curtain they may have based it on race.

Dr. King would be so proud right now...thanks for setting the process back mainstream media.

Dave D.

Something's happening here

NOVA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:41:40 GMT

Still such venom even in this article. You may think that Barak Obama is a cultural revolutionary moment - but so were mini skirts. I'll stick with the proven track record of traditional retail (as you so point out) quality. Keep the mini skirt - its style has never lasted long just painfully raises its head to annoy the steadfast.

Something's happening here

Austin, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:41:57 GMT

"That the same state rewarded these two imperfect politicians, in the same way, years apart, is remarkable."

Calling Clintons imperfect is pretty judgemental by a
news reader. Voters we can call them what we want,
but reporters like you should inform what you see,
we don't care about opinions .

Something's happening here

Hil Fan — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:42:14 GMT

Can't help but think you are rooting for OBAMA which makes me a little reluctant to even watch you anymore. Go Hil!!!

Something's happening here

Ruth, Northbrook, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:43:49 GMT

Hillary won, Edwards bleeds... It was women, women, women!
Edwards insulted women by demeaning Hillary's emotional cry, which was genuine in the eyes of women and many men, but perhaps not one of her most contested opposition. That was his mistake. Hillary won a lot of Edwards' women's vote.

Debate gang-up on Hillary - Even though I really can't stand Hillary, I can see why women came to her defense and to her aid. Many of the women in her own demographic, educated & white, identify with her struggle to succeed in a world where there haven't been many women in top positions. They don't want to be denigrated in an authentic moment, and that is how they felt. They felt denigrated themselves when Hillary was denigrated, because she ws finally being seen to be her true self and not a calculating politician.

Men still have to be careful with Hillary as a woman candidate. Even though she can behave spitefully, there still is a level of expecation and what is considered Proper decorum in relating to a woman possibly even in moments where she is being very hostile or confrontational. It entirely depends on teh perception of her behavior combined with the perception of the male candidates' behavior.

Something's happening here

Moon, Chicago — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:43:52 GMT

I would just like to call attention to Dan Clem's post above. (12:09 p.m.)

He is absolutely correct - if I was just listening to MSNBC new shows (or probably any of them), I wouldn't know what the politicians stances on the issues were, but I would know that Hillary cried and all the other "gotcha" commentary (The Chris Matthews Show is unwatchable since the primary season heated up). How about comparing how the candidates stand on issues? If the news people would change the way they cover the campaigns, maybe we wouldn't end up with the lowest common denominator, like George W. Bush.

Something's happening here

Terry Foster, Laguna Hills, Calif — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:45:19 GMT

Brian,
Thank you for your admission of bias in the media. My view is it is even worse on the Republican side. The media has a hateful regard to conservative issues, simply because our current President has overseen a miserable handling of the aftermath of the fall of Saddam.
Give an even light to all candidates, allow more than soundbites, which is how the media in the past has tried to control the news, and allow the people to hear actual thoughts and ideas from them all.
I may totally disagree with the liberal ideas of tax and spend, but I equally disdain the Republicans for finally achieving power in the three branches of Governmaent, and then turning around and having their own PET projects (Bridge in Alaska).
Let the candidates speak, let the people judge and consider the long term effects of their offered programs and then let us decide.
I'm afraid that the dumbing down of America in our schools and the reporting bias has dealt this nation a mighty blow.
America, look for a leader that can fix our nation, not tax us into oblivion. Look for someone who will lead by stopping frivilous spending, if they exist, and pay attention to long term consequences of what these candidates promise to "DO FOR YOU"

Something's happening here

L. Williams, Cleveland Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:47:13 GMT

KUDOS to New Hampshire with their resounding show of "we'll make up our own minds thank you"!!! The media with their feeble attempt to use psychology to influence the minds of voters - FAILED. Their character assination of Hillary Clinton was shameful. What happened to judging an individual by the content of their character, and speaking of character, where is the media's? For years HIllary has shown outstanding "staying" power, "fight for the cause", and unbelievable courage through a mess of trials. KUDOS HILLARY, I'm a great supporter to the end.

Something's happening here

Dave Haney, Parker, Arizona — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:47:31 GMT

Brian. I am a unhappy GE stockholder. You are part of the problem with the price of this stock. Bad news at NBC makes for bad news at GE. Your love for the Clintons causes me and many other to watch Fox. Many people in this country are tired of the Clintons (probably the Bushes too). Mrs. Clinton uses everyone including you......... Wake up. The anti-conservative, pro-liberal rant from you and your pals is crushing the American news industry. My copy of this to Mr. Immelt will suggest dumping NBC.

Something's happening here

Jeanine Mohr, Chadron, Nebraska — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:48:25 GMT

I think a contributing factor to Hillary's win was the near disastrous Iranian speedboats incident. I think it was a wake-up call that this election should not be a personality contest but about who can best lead America through a very serious time in history with our international affairs as well as home. I would love to have someone check out my theory?

Something's happening here

Jeff, Dix Hills, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:48:50 GMT

In what has already shaped-up as the most compelling political period in quite some time, the topsy-turvy nature of the first 2 prelims makes this a fascinating campaign to cover. Brian, great journalism. Whether one is a democart, republican , independent or other, this is starting out as fascinating!

Something's happening here

Wayne Toledo, Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:49:19 GMT

The reason she defied all the pundits is they played the poor woman card. First she almost cries and what woman can't turn that on or off at will. They also played the if a woman acts tough she's a bitch. Please feel sorry for Hillary. Then they get Mr. "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" out to campain for her. Hey Bill would never lie about anything. I am not for Hillary or Obama or any Demorcrat. I am still trying to figure out which one of these professional politicians won't continue screwing up the country like the current administration. We really need to get away from all the current ones and start over. Hillary has been in D.C since Watergate and she is funded by special intrest groups anyone who thinks she will change thigs for the better is an idiot.

Something's happening here

Chris, Salem, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:49:39 GMT

I haven't noticed any comments from one of the undeclared, female New Hampshire voters. Well, I'm one. I voted for Hillary yesterday because I believe she will bring something new to the role of president. I resented being told by the media that I was going to vote a certain way. I refused to participate in any pre- or post- voting questions about who I was voting for. I love the process we have in this country to elect our officials. Knowing these candidates were so accessible to the New Hampshire voters makes this a unique experience. The past week I have turned off the talking heads on TV telling me who I am and what I think. Read a few good books waiting for my turn to vote. Now my candidate of choice is on to other states to wage her battles. I wish her all the luck in the world.

Something's happening here

Christina a Savo — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:49:41 GMT

How thrilling to see Hillary beat the media. It was all so clear. A woman,let's attack her, let's accuse her of faking emotion, let's try to give the primary to a male who apparently doesn't know yet that change comes by working within the established boundaries of government with credibility and not just empty words. Hurray for Hillary... and to the media...you got what you deserved...a kick in the teeth and perhaps a message to the predominantly male voices there...you are not the voice of the American people and you are especially not the voice of women. We have the ability to defeat you and all of your empty, meaningless, mean, nasty and biased reporting.

Something's happening here

Jeanne Cordova, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:49:44 GMT

Something's happening here

Rich, Tracy, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:50:46 GMT

A couple points:
1) Brian, It's historically inaccurate to say that New Hampshirites are the descendants of the Puritans, since the Puritans didn't even found the colony of New Hampshire (it was Scots-Irish settlers, mainly), and it was not until 1741, when a border dispute between New Hampshire and Massachusetts colonies was settled, that several Puritan-founded communities, or fragments of them (including Portsmouth, Hampton, Exeter, Salem, Nashua, etc) found themselves on the New Hampshire side of the new border. And even then, later immigration, particularly by French Canadians and Nova Scotians, changed the character of all the New England states. There's been a great deal of mixing between these populations and later immigrants since, so to say "the core... is still made up of the sons and daughters of the original Puritans" shows you don't know the region as well as you say. I was born in Massachusetts, as were my parents, with my grandfathers born in towns on the Massachusetts side of the border with New Hamsphire, and my grandmothers coincidentally in the same town on the New Hampshire side, all areas settled by Puritans, but my ancestry is still only about 50% Puritan-descended. The remainder is New Hampshirite Scots-Irish, Quebecois, Nova Scotian (English, Scots, and German), Swiss, English and Irish. I'm sure many New Hampshirites can tell similar stories about their heritage. Don't claim special knowledge that you don't actually have.

2) Everyone seems to be missing the obvious reason why the polls and the election results differed, and it's pretty simple - phone polls (and exit polls) can only measure the responses of those willing to participate - those who hang up on (or walk by) pollsters don't get counted, and that can't help but to skew the results. And I can easily imagine the average New Hampshire voter becoming less and less willing to participate in poll after poll after poll as the election got closer. Who's left to poll, then? The highly engaged who want to sway polls in the favor of their candidate, and those who don't like hanging up on pollsters. Why wasn't this also the case in Iowa? Perhaps because any caucus voter is already highly engaged, more than a voter who only takes 20 minutes to get to the polling place, vote, and get on with their day.

Something's happening here

Esther, New York City — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:50:49 GMT

MSNBC - one of my favorite news sources - let me down, big time. What a disgrace. And Chris Matthews - I don't think there are adequate words to describe his abhorent actions, and the arrogance in which he uttered them. What in the world was he thinking - an experienced, respected news source and thinker, creating the outcome before the events even occurred. Thinking? Obviously he wasn't. Like Obama, Matthews head has gotten too big for the door. Obama cloaks it via mastering the art of selling/telling dreams to impressionable and idealistic young people, while Matthews has gotten too comfortable in his on-air skin to give a hoot about journalistic integrity and accountability.

I thank you Brian Williams for speaking up and caring.

Something's happening here

Ernie — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:51:23 GMT

A lovely, insightful piece. Thanks Brian.

See you back here in NH one day soon, no doubt.

Something's happening here

Natalie — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:51:41 GMT

I never pay attention to polling, because the only poll that counts is the voter poll on election day. The media pundits are more often proven wrong.

Something's happening here

mary — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:53:07 GMT

Thank you, Mr. Williams, as always, for presenting the media's bias against Senator Clinton. This was something that I had repeatedly blogged, but that seemed like very few others were noticing: Anything that Senator Clinton tried to do to appease a negative and complaining media, would be used against her. She is a wonderful woman, who has done incredible things for the underprivileged of America and for the good of the nation.

Something's happening here

J. Johnston~ Missouri — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:53:28 GMT

Were the minds of the New Hamphire voters really changed or were they just not fully made up yet before the essence of Hillary really shined through?

You state she lost control of her emotions, but it could be argued that John Edwards lost control of his in the NH debate where he placed his hand (on the wrong side of his chest if aiming for his heart) stating it was personal and you have to feel it "in here." Obama was running on his emotions all throughout his campaigning where he moved people to tears~ he does not campaign from an intellectual point of view but an emotional one. Hillary "lost her emotions" because of her gender, and how we collectively really have not come so far as to redefine the cultural classifications of what it means to be 'male' and 'female.'

What men do not understand is that it IS a different path for a women in all realms of employment and especially the political realm where every detail is under scrutiny; if we are standing in a coat of armor or intellect then we are cold and often called curse words for it; if we allow our eyes to glisten out of a heart reaction we are weak and too emotional...there is no happy medium.

The media did however give Hillary a bum deal throughout this whole process and as an independent voter I can say I honestly respect the idea of bringing everyone's record to light~ I do not see this as negative campaigning, but as a fair thing to do. Every move Obama made was followed by an almost "messianic" quality in the media while Hillary was portrayed as desperate, washed up and struggling. It was VERY biased to witness which only testifies to the fact of how deeply ingrained our ideologies of 'male' and 'female' roles go~ she was thrown under the bus before debate night.

Hillary's "emotional" moment was a HUMAN moment~ and since we are comparing Obama to Martin Luthor King, I must say I felt a little Evita within Hillary! Hillary has learned to reserve heart when out in the public because of the implication in America that when a women is emotional at all, she is unstable and loses credability. Plain and simple.

I feel that when she stated, "She found her own voice," she is meaning that no longer will she bow to this stereotype! She will be strong, intellectual, skillful, and also heart and soul combined throughout her public life~ just as she is in private life.

This is the movement I hope catches on!

I am an independent voter and I am voting for Hillary Clinton!

Something's happening here

Tom Disbrow, West Columbia, SC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:53:49 GMT

Brian,

Mrs. Clinton’s show of emotional expression seemed genuine to me. The frustration of needing something that a destiny-holding and empowered group of people must provide and yet seem unwilling to give can be wrenching. No matter the effort, the expense, the uncounted repetitions of the message, the desperate appeals to absorb the message and then react in the most reasonable way. An invitation to unite for a cause greater than the individual and move forward that apparently is repeatedly ignored.

If the politicians in Washington could sit across a table with most Americans today and watch the tears well up in our eyes as we individually beg them to address Health Care, Medicare, Social Security, Iraq, the environment, energy, college costs, transportation infrastructure, etc. with unselfish integrity, competence, and camaraderie they would recognize sincere weariness and frustration.

Thanks for an excellent article.

Something's happening here

Steve, Salem, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:54:34 GMT

Brian, your view of NH is correct. I believe that the pollsters, who incessantly called NH residents were rewarded with a tell them what they want to hear. The polls stated calling our household in September. Our household was receiving 6 calls a day from "pollsters" for the past 2 weeks. So I went from Hillary to undecided to Obama and voted the way I was going to from the beginning. There were pollsters asking questions in such a way that you could only give the answer they were looking for and not what you believed. Pollsters are the bain of politics. NH residents don't worry what others are thinking. They definitely do not listen to the polls. Whether a person thinks the same or differently than they do doesn't bother them. They look to the reasons why the other person is leaning towards or holding a position. They will make up their own mind and definitely ignore the polls.

Something's happening here

A. Miller, Cincinnati OH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:54:42 GMT

Nice, thoughtful piece. But what I found perhaps most disturbing over the last few days was the level of cynicism conveyed by a spectrum of pundits appearing, among other places, on MSNBC. With respect to Clinton, Chris Matthews was perhaps the most egregious, to the point where it really does seem that he actually may have helped her. Another striking interlude was the cackling and joking about McCain's victory speech that went on for some time. Yes, it was a lousy, wooden speech, as should have been obvious to anyone tuning in. But, please, start acting like professionals a little, or try to get a job on Comedy Central, where John Stewart already does it better than anyone at MSNBC.

Something's happening here

Steven Bissell, Roatan, Honduras — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:55:49 GMT

I think the 'media' wants to get it right but several things keep them from doing so; they listen to themselves and not the people, they focus on the trival issues of personality and such rather than on the policies, and finally there just aren't very many 'journalists' who are smart enough to get it right. There are very few, perhaps no, Edward R. Murrows out there anymore; 'Journalism,' especially the electronic media has become more about haircuts and style rather than substance. Why do you think many networks and local stations call them 'on air personalities?'

Something's happening here

Gerald Henderson, Denver, CO — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:55:58 GMT

David Halberstam couldn't have said it better. Bravo!

Something's happening here

james mckee — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:56:18 GMT

Good job Mr. Williams on your coverage however can someone explain to me why we have Iowa and NH Primary first. Just because someone wins Iowa or NH doesn't mean they will be next president of the United States. I am still waiting for really issues to be talked about, like why is gas prices so high and why are all of our tech jobs going overseas. The immigration issue only effect a small protion of this country and only the people in Arizona are crying file. Those Immigrants are good for working all them hours in the day, but certain people don't want them living next door. Isn't that what they said about another certain group of people.

Something's happening here

Eric N Winter, Carlsbad, California — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:56:19 GMT

Since no one on earth is a perfect candidate, why mention that Hillary is an imperfect one? Are you implying that Obama is a perfect candidate? Can you think of a candidate who is MORE perfect than Hillary?
Your bias is showing.

Something's happening here

John, New Haven, CT — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:57:00 GMT

I was there...in Lebanon. I was there for an ideal. I was there because I believed that what has been broken, can now be fixed. People say that we should question the polls. Based on the statements of pollsters after yesterday, the final word is that this rarely happens. The question is why? After listening and reading various explanations, I can only conclude that there are a myriad of reasons...unfortunately one of those involves the Bradley Effect. And as far as I'm concerned the fact that there is some inkling of truth to that reality spells doom for the ideal and dream that I have. I pray that I am wrong about the people of this country. I pray that in the end we recognize that Senator Obama is talking about building a working majority, not the divisive and conflicted minority that the former Clinton administration displayed and the current Clinton campaign embodies. I am ashamed of my country for this reckless demonstration of prejudice.

Something's happening here

Vince Egan, Chicago, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:57:27 GMT

For the past 20 years this country has had either a Bush or a Clinton as president. In a country of nearly 300 million people it seems we could find someone better than a member of those two families. We need a change, someone with new ideas and a fresh outlook, not someone with a sense of entitlement and the same old tired thinking from the 90's.

Something's happening here

Paige, Alexandria, VA, from Iowa — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:58:01 GMT

I realized something last night, something I should have thought of long ago. Hillary isn't a robot or "unhuman", she's tough. I deal with this everyday at the office: Strong, tough, stoic men are admired. Strong, tough, stoic women are bitches. Why is this? I think you'd have to be defensive and tough to make it so far in a traditional boy's club.

Something's happening here

Izzy Rubio, Tucson, AZ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:58:25 GMT

I watched the whole NH primary process unfold last night and have read a few of the articles that have come out since. I find it interesting that many people (including News anchors and "Political Specialists") are missing the most simple explanations for last night's events.

First, it was a good night for Clinton... but, it was not comparable to a "miracle". Many forget it was just a few weeks ago that she had a double digit lead in the polls and people were ready to give her the nomination. Equal to her victory last night (or virtual tie) is the fact that Obama has built his campaign up to at the very least be of equal status with Clinton.

Second, absent from much of the commentary is whether the results truly portray a strong vote in favor of Clinton. Many of the "analysts" are ignoring that the preliminary polls and the news themselves are an influence to what actually happens. As such, I suggest the following very simple explanation of the results last night...
1) The news/polls clearly made it evident that Obama had a strong lead. This alone influenced the voting in a few ways (which is also supported by the exit poll numbers). First, many independents may have decided to vote in the Republican primary, already knowing that Obama had a strong lead. Second, the news of Obama's lead likely pushed many Clinton supporters to go out to vote who might otherwise have been indifferent or would have decided not to make it out to vote otherwise. Similarly, the news of Obama's lead may have reduced the urgency for Obama supporters to go out and vote, thinking their votes were not necessarily "needed".
2) Clinton's "human moments" or "breakdown" definitely persuaded a group of voters... most likely more influential to women. As such, whether it was a sympathy vote or a vote for seeing the "human" side of Clinton, clearly that influenced the results. The question remains whether Clinton can ride a sympathy vote to the nomination. People of all genders will need to strongly consider whether they want a president that will have those types of moments in situations that will be much more stressful, much more common, and in front of allies and foes.

Something's happening here

Suzanne Huggard 9 Reservoir Road Deering, NH 03244 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:58:47 GMT

I enjoyed your very fair observations in the article. But while Hillary surpassed the recent polling predictions, let's not overlook the fact that Obama was predicted to lose to Hillary by double digits a mere 2 weeks ago. To me, the amazing thing is that he was able to close it to a nearly statistical dead heat! Should be interesting from here on in.

Something's happening here

N Reed, Lincoln RI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:58:52 GMT

Sorry, Brian, the Andrea Mitchell spot on "Clinton" on your 6:00 news yesterday, was in fact dominated by clips on Obama. It was unbalanced and seem to follow a trend in the last several weeks of partiality on the part of at least Mitchell, Mathews and Russert who conveyed dislike for Senator Clinton, and the wish to see her lose.
I have always been an avid MSNBC viewer but have been disturbed about the seeming imbalance in reporting in this matter.. Even last evening it seemed some reporters, like Chris Matthew were upset that she won and were overpromoting Obama.
I hope you will all examine your biases and report the news, not try to impart your seeming wishes to us viewers.

Thanks for the essay. I do think everyone is overly emphasizing that the campaigns had it wrong too, and trying to use that to cover up for their errors.

I sincerely hope that the direction at MSNBC gets realigned to fulfill the goal of reporting the news

Thank you

Something's happening here

Rick Huston, Carmel, IN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:59:34 GMT

I came here to say what a great article, but dozens of others have already done so. Keep up the good work, MSNBC has the best people.

Something's happening here

J. Johnston~ Missouri — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:00:02 GMT

Something's happening here

Alice Sullivan — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:00:46 GMT

As a voter i do not decide on whom to vote for by listening to the media or the polls. I think for myself. I am very happy that Obama was defeated I hope it stays that way. To young, no experience in foreigh affairs and I doubt he would be any good in the illegal situation. He talks a good story and that is about it.

Something's happening here

Leslie Wise, Atlanta, GA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:00:56 GMT

If I'm not mistaken I believe all the pollsters and
pundits got it wrong for the Kerry/Bush election
also. I think most called for a Kerry victory and
were surprised when Bush won thanks to the
Evangelical vote that seemed to slip by so many
"experts". Brian was right when he said that they
will all forget they got it wrong, and will most
likely screw up again. Only 11 more months of this!

Something's happening here

Jeff F, Bothell, WA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:01:16 GMT

I can't help thinking that the shift in support among female voters might have as much to do with the Obama-Edwards tag team as it did with Clinton tearing up. Or perhaps the two together did more than either could have done alone.

Something's happening here

Carol Avery — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:01:23 GMT

It's okay to vote for Hillary. She is qualified to be President. The fact that she is a woman and shows emotions now and again only adds reality to those qualifications. Mr. Matthews needs to listen before he speaks, but since he is always talking, how could he possibly hear anyone else? And as for Tom Brokaw, I was very disappointed to hear him laud Mr. Obama's oratory and compare him to MLK, and then turn around and dish Ms. Clinton's dirty laundry from seven years ago as a reason for her being able to overcome her loss in Iowa. Please, that is so unlike you! You owe her an appology, big time. I will take experience any day, no matter the gender.

cma, Ohio

Something's happening here

D. Leja — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:01:46 GMT

While Brian Williams' commentary is a wonderful piece, the American People have finally said to the media and the pollsters: "Thank you, but we'll make up our own minds!" The candidates have gotten our message. The media and pollsters have not. What will be dissected for days will result in nothing more than a sickening number of spins defending the media's error. Why did the media jump on the "double-digit" lead of Obama's? Because it's bad news for the other guys, especially Clinton, and bad news - only bad news - drags us to the media lunch counter. The first desire to ignite in sales and marketing is "fear". Fear of loss, fear of not being first, fear of not being on the winning team. Well, pundits, we've bellied up to the lunch counter for a helping of fear many a time, and now we've served you a good healthy dish of the house special - fear. The media is now afraid that we won't listen to their spins, and with good reason. New Hampshire isn't just a turning point for Hillary, it's a turning point for America. We want change! And yes, that change even goes for the media and the pollsters. So, again, we'll make up own minds from herein.

Something's happening here

Mr. Z — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:02:04 GMT

It is, I think, dangerous and equally as irresponsible to characterize a smallest-of-margins squeaker as a resounding triumph for Hillary. Iowa and New Hampshire proved Democrats to be enthusiastically undecided (divide the massive bleeding heart into thirds and you have the gist of your support for Clinton, Obama and Edwards)and showed Republicans to be downright confused, uninspired and utterly without fire. As inspiring, well written and elegant as this indictment of the media is (within which Mr. Williams is ostensibly a figure of some prominence) it fundamentally serves to benefit Obama and Clinton, and to imply that we are in the throes of history - that to line a cold avenue to get a glimpse of Barack Obama is somehow akin to being behind and to the right at Dr. King's "I Have a Dream." (Or to imply that Hillary's tears, like a squat, blonde super political Phoenix, have POLLING powers...)

We are, once again, allowing the media and campaign managers and political strategists to broker politicians to us under the guise of inspiration and hope (and in the midst of great national/personal fear and uncertainty...which somehow increases the tincture of malfeasance.) This beautifully written and evocative article simply furthers that cause.

Something's happening here

Ray, Tampa, Fl. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:02:26 GMT

Great....so what you're saying is......voters are choosing their candidate based on spite...."The press won't tell ME what to do!!!" Some real intelligent, independent thinking there.....thanks, NH!

Something's happening here

C. J. McGuire, Dyer, IN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:04:19 GMT

Brian: Well said and expertly analyzed. You really nailed it.

Something's happening here

Tom Steffey — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:04:35 GMT

What President Clinton said about not having enough time between Iowa and New Hamshire work to there advantage. It didn't allow enough time for the polls and media to influence the voters. This is the best evidence on how polls work. Polls should only be used for after elections to determine why people voted the way they did.

Something's happening here

Eric Peckham, Sandy, Utah — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:05:06 GMT

It all just goes to show that people who are ruled by their emotions are those who are most easily manipulated by politicians and press alike. It's unbelievable to me to hear how people will make such important decisions based on a candidate's appearance or skill at manipulating a crowd. While those things may have a limited legitimate role, it's the substance (or lack thereof) underlying it all that really matters. Maybe "we the people" are so shallow that we don't expect anything more from our politicians. We certainly are spoiled rotten - I'm so sick and tired of hearing about lack of health care and not being able to live on what we make. Even the poorest among us has more wealth and better health care than the vast majority of people now living, or especially, who have ever lived. The short-sightedness and willful ignorance that leads to thinking that pulling out of Iraq now is particularly disturbing. The politicians know how stupid that is (except maybe Barack Obama, who seems to really believe his own incredibly naive statements) but they are just saying what they think you want to hear. Don't think they will follow through with it - it's ridiculous how we call our president the "most powerful man in the world". Thankfully, our president is very limited in power by our constitution (George Bush has had zero negative effect on your civil rights, no matter how many people repeat that ridiculous assertion), and these populists who promise everything won't be able to deliver on a fraction of their promises, even if they do believe they're the right thing to do (which most of them don't care about, let alone believe). Call me cynical if you want, but I believe it's high time we start counting our blessings instead of imagining all these wrongs that have been done to us. If anything, George Bush is most responsible for keeping us safe from more terrorist attacks - who would have thought that we would go more than six years without another attack after 9/11? It's really quite amazing, and something we should all be very grateful for, as the cost for most of us has been almost nothing. Some, however, have paid the ultimate cost, and it is to them we owe our eternal gratitude, not these politicians who would lead us into an imaginary paradise, which is in reality fraught with danger.

Something's happening here

Eric B — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:05:22 GMT

This phony "confounded the media" hype happens all the time yet the media never focuses on what Chris Matthews rightly pointed out. That often no matter how much people decry 'political correctness' they fall right in line when a reporter or pollster asks them a question regarding a Black candidate. They fear being labeled as racist so they say what they think is politacally palatble at the time but once they get in the voting booth their true feelings come out. How else do you explain this primary vote, David Dinkins re-election attempt and so many other cases where a Black male candidate did oh so well in the polls beforehand but lost anyway, usually as a Democrat,in a Democratic stronghold running against a Republican candidate who otherwise didn't stand a chance.

Something's happening here

Lisa Simmons — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:05:54 GMT

I find it laughable that you actually had to call your EP to get her to air the sound bite from Sen. Clinton getting teary eyed. It was all over the web and the wires and 24 hour tv stations. And the fact that you guys got it wrong doesn't mean that you got it wrong because things changed after Sen. Clinton got emotional. There is no way to know this for sure unless you talk to voters, which you haven't. You are just guessing. If there's any message the media should take away from the so-called, "upsets" in NH is that it is not a good idea for the media to keep guessing and call it a fact. -Lisa, Brooklyn, NY

Something's happening here

Jack N., San Francisco, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:06:33 GMT

Brian: This is a great piece of writing. It is good to hear some introspection by the media. Your job is to report the news. Unfortunately, many in the media have gone into the business of trying to make the news and influence the outcome of events. I have been especially disappointed with Chris Matthews and Tim Russert in their "coverage" of this presidential race. Clearly, there remain deep and subtle prejudices against women in this country. I would even characterize Mr. Mathews and Mr. Russert as bordering on being misogynist. I would like to see a more in depth reporting of the records and history of ALL the candidates instead of cynical opinions based on personal prejudices. Please do some in depth reporting. What we are seeing is news organizations doing polls, reporting on their own polls, trying to tell the future based on their own polls and disguising "opinion" as fact. I for one, don't need to be told what to think. I can hear the facts, see the candidates, and come to my own opinions. Let's get back to reporting the news and the gold standard of real investigative reporting. I remain a devoted NBC viewer....although it is becoming more difficult when individuals like Chris Matthews and Tim Russert start running amock and begin taking themselves too seriously....someone should have a talk with them.

Something's happening here

Tom Steffey, coldwater, mi — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:07:04 GMT

Something's happening here

Lily, W\inston Salem, N.C. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:07:07 GMT

I think New Hampshire and the rest of the country is sick of the media trying to force their opinions on the rest of us. Chris Matthews, who I had respected in the past has really lost some footing with me.
I still have not made up my mind, but am beginning to resent the Hillary bashing very much.I think she like the rest of us is very emotional when it comes to the election, because it is so important. I also like Obama, but do not believe he has yet given us any specificity on many of the issues. He certainly hasn't been grilled or treated as harshly as she has. Let's wait awhile before we start comparing him to the Kennedys and Martin Luther King, and not that it matters but reading the teleprompter is not making an off the cuff speech, Chris. I am thrilled we are at a point where we have a stong black candidate and a strong woman candidate, but let's don't elect either for that fact alone.

Something's happening here

Joe Slater Hart Flat California — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:08:03 GMT

Brian--
The article reflects a puffy ego, yours, not the candidates. It complemented the inflated rhetoric, though. Take another look or run it past a good, honest editor.

Something's happening here

Bruce, southern NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:08:58 GMT

I think the media needs to start reporting the news verses predicting the news. The news reports this week were more about the polls than the issues. The younger voters may have not voted because Obama was to win by a landslide and did not need their vote.

Something's happening here

Audre Touf, Middle America — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:09:08 GMT

The pundits got it wrong? Their paid to behave like that. New Hampshire voters didn't like being told what to think? Well, the polls were of New Hampshire voters, so I guess they irrationally disagreed with themselves at the last minute. And about those polls, look at them closely, they predicted the outcome for each race extremely accurately, except one. Guess. Something happening indeed Brian.....

Audre Touf

Something's happening here

Matt, Denver, CO — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:09:31 GMT

It's only because the whole thing is RIGGED!! VOTE FRAUD HAS BEEN VERIFIED. Town of Sutton, NH had 31 votes for Ron Paul out of 300 for that poll station but 0 was the reported total, attributed to 'human error. No matter who you want, IT'S 'THEY DECIDE 2008', NOT 'YOU DECIDE 2008'. Go to blackbox.org to see the breaking news!!!

Something's happening here

E Brazier — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:09:35 GMT

We can't deny tht so many people wanted to touch, to hear, to feel Obama. How could anyone think there was a whiff of racism yesterday.I sincerely hope the media does not introduct the race card. I am a staunch Obama supporter. I can not abide the Clinton. But as an older, well educated women who has experienced the man's world, I "felt" Hillary's pain. And if I had been voting in NH, thought Obama was as shew in, I may have for one brief moment given my vote, my support to a human being in deep pain. I think a lot of women felt this way. But the final results can not diminish or deny the wave of Obama.

Something's happening here

Karen, Oregon WI — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:10:43 GMT

It is time we stopped listening to the so called "know-it-all" news anchors/reporters/pundits and start relying on ourselves and our own intelligence to choose the next president. We have to stop allowing the media to control what we think, what we feel, what we read, who we are, who we want to be...blah, blah, blah. After all, the media insists on feeding us our daily dose of Britney Spears, Lindsey Lohan, Paris Hilton (WHO CARES!!!!!!)when we have an exciting, groundbreaking presidential race in progress. Pay attention to what the candidates are saying, not what the media is saying. The people of New Hampshire got it right...they don't let anyone tell them who to vote for or what to think. We should all follow suit.

Something's happening here

Joe Bellinger, Overland Park, KS — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:11:49 GMT

Thank you Brian for an insightful look at your industry and the demons it creates for itself. We should all continue to learn from the dangers of assuming. A lesson I hope most of our parents tried to instill in us as children.

As a decidedly "Believer in Obama," and young professional voter, I am bothered by the cynicism and assumptions made by the media. I too believe that Obama represents a positive change and movement that the United States needs, but much like the movement of the waves in the ocean, this movement needs be left to the natural forces without tampering from foreign objects. Get out of the way and stop trying to guide or help the best change that could possible ever come to Washington. HOPE.

Sure, HOPE, a quality that Obama so greatly enboides doesn't provide our analytical brains with the step by step processes that our blackberry driven world demands. Hope doesn't provide a demonstrative alternative to our current problems, but it does set the foundation for change. Almost all of the candidates have declared a desire for change, but the same many don’t understand the foundation that must be made to bring change to a nation.

Obama understands change and disregards the conventional wisdom that you must provide a step by step process as a candidate to do a job that no one could possibly understand until they have done it. The media and many voters in America often demand a step by step process for change. That is an absurd request! Please provide me with an effective example of when a candidate has described a step by step process that became reality once he stepped into the oval office.

Why then do we demand such absurdities? Because we have been conditioned to do so. Our nations largest voting demographic, the Baby Boomers, once oversaw great change to this country and how did they do it. With a hope and belief in change! These sole characteristics were the driving force that forged change that most of the time had no step by step process attached. Let go of the binds that have bound you since you last felt this HOPE. Find once again the courage and audicity to HOPE!

HOPE is a necessary and fundamental step in the direction for real, meaningful Change. And there you have it, all you analytical naysayers, the answer to your demand for a step by step analysis for change. Obama is answering, not with words, but with real action, (Another childhood lesson: Actions Speak Louder than Words) Obama not just talking about the steps involved in change, he is taking that first step in the direction of change. He is Believing and Hoping, and he is asking you to do the same.

Something's happening here

Helen, Palm Harbor, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:12:31 GMT

The media seems to have gone overboard in lauding Obama's speeches.....what is the man saying? He's rather naive to think he can change Washington and the world in four years and the media is just eating that up. Good grief! get a grip! I know the media wants to be 'on the side' of a winner so they can obtain interviews...but this is ridiculous. Have you noticed how his speeches and actions have changed? Now, he is 'full of himself' with all the praise you people have misplaced on him.
Obama is not ready for the challenges we face....maybe in a dozen years he will be.

Something's happening here

Mike, Columbus, OH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:13:19 GMT

I agree that Brian has summarized beatifully in his article today. I am surprised with the fact that I have heard that America is not ready for a woman President. Then How America could be ready for a Muslim President (Obama Hussein Barack: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama). I really agree that Media thinks that they are Guru/Pundits and can predict with 100% accuracy the results. Imagine how much these media journalists getting paid for reporting wrong information and statistics. This is not happening in America but all over the world. Nobody argues on the facts and truthfulness of the information but it seems they just do bad analysis. I am shocked with the way Media harrased Sen. Hillary Clinton just because she is a woman and unfortunately wants to make a difference in America.

Something's happening here

Nancee Phoenix, AZ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:13:45 GMT

I'm really sick of the media always trying to jump ahead of itself. There's so much competition within it, taht they either can get it wrong or misinterpret it. Why not just wait to see what happens and comment about the process, not the results, until the results are in?
This wasn't fair to Hiliary or the campaign she's trying to run.
In fact, couldn't this media blitz about "Obama, the Savior" created a situation where more and more people got on board with his campaign, making the numbers even worse for Hiliary? This is scary-that this could have boomeranged, via media manipulation.

Something's happening here

Chris, Waterloo, IA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:14:01 GMT

The problem is the people are STILL doing what the media tells them to do. Sen. Joe Biden was the best candidate the Dems had, but the focus since day 1 has been on Clinton Obama then Edwards.
Read your local paper and watch the news and debates.
Obama and Clinton came to my hometown a few times each time it was on the front page. Joe Biden was in town and it was pg 5., same with a couple others.
So regardless of this article the people ARE NOT looking at the person, the are being sucked in by the media bias and the "hollywood" type of candidates.

Something's happening here

Jan Zella, Pittsburgh, PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:15:12 GMT

I agree with many who say the media has been unfairly critical of Hillary. And that criticism isn't coming just from Fox and the Right! The "progressive" blogs like Huffington Post are just as bad. Before yesterday I was so thoroughly disgusted with the reporting and the MSM responses to Iowa that I hadn't read or watched any news for the last few days. (I must add that the reporting today isn't much different...it still has a "anti-female" tone about it.) Being a political junkie and a political volunteer, I was about ready become one of the many disillusioned American who don't even cast a vote.
I don't think the MSM accidentally got it wrong....I think the idea behind their reporting and polling was to influence New Hampshire voters. The Media does it all the time! Maybe people are finally wising-up and learning to do their own research and draw their own conclusions about the candidates. We all know that today's "media darling" is tomorrow's "next target." Anything to attract an audience!
There is all this talk about change coming from the Obama camp. So what's the big change? Obama still represents the "good old boys' club" in the political arena with the exception that his skin color is darker than all the previous occupants of the office of president. On the other hand, Hillary brings a totally different perceptive to how the issues a president would and/or might confronted during his/her term in office would be handled.. All scientific studies have shown that the brains of men and women are wired different and as a result, men and women tackle and solve problems and situations differently. After more than 230 years of men occupying the American Presidency, I happen to think that a woman in that position bring a much great and more significant CHANGE than any male, regardless of his skin color.
Could we please have "Fair " coverage and allow the people and not the media decide who our next leader will be?

Something's happening here

Cynthia, Mt. Pleasant, S.C. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:15:43 GMT

Mr. Williams,
Thank you for putting into words the thoughts and actions of all the players involved in yesterday's primary. It was summarized beautifully and in this "buyers market" for political real estate, you really shed some light on the structure of the true political process.

Something's happening here

Jan Reynolds, Rye. NJ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:15:59 GMT

I found that this primary more than others I have voted in, was so so important. There are so many issues and not too much resolve. When the media(all of you)predicted that Obama would come out 10-12% ahead of Hillary made all of us wonder why we should even vote. I listened very intensely to the debate and to the candidates. I read all the articles I could get my hands on. Plus the Internet. When I walked to the polls in Rye towards the end of the day, I made my decision. I voted for Hillary and had a feeling she was going to come out just fine although I didn't believe she would win because I listened to all of you. Some of you were kind, others made jokes. Voting to me is no joke. Most of the candidates gave their all to the voters of NH and we thank them.

Something's happening here

Jennifer — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:16:06 GMT

I think that the media needs to re-evaluate its practices and not dominate the way people vote and go about their daily lives. Everything is hyped by the media from the election to "celebrities", etc. Things need to be the way they used to be...the news needs to only report the actual news and not speculate every possible angle for days on end and run things into the ground.

Something's happening here

Molly O'Brien — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:16:30 GMT

I agree with the Hillary supporters. I decided yesterday that she is going to get my vote because she handled herself like a pro under extreme circumstances. I always liked Chris Matthews but his very obvious dislike for the Clintons became personal. He was a one man crusade against her with his terrible put-downs. Why so mean-spirited? She didn't deserve that after 30 years of hard work. Just report the news Chris. We don't want or need you to try to make the news come out to suit your perception of things. And don't ever try to tell an American how to feel or how to vote. NH proved that. Nobody was fooled by the media hype. But thanks for helping Hillary win.

Something's happening here

Mark, Lewiston, Maine — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:16:59 GMT

Well said Brian. We are decendants of Puritans here in Maine and the rest of New England. Your thoughtful explantion of yesterday's events are by far the most plausble. Tom Brokaw Really slapped Matthews last night for his irresponsible coverage-like a parent to a child. (Tom remembers Bush vs Gore). I am a Political junkie and I enjoy MSNBC very much. Matthews is entertaining, but he is starting to get sloppy with his growing absense of objectivity. He seemed to get enjoyment from her apparent demise. I was disgusted and so was New Hampshire. I am an Obama fan but Hillary will get my vote and all the votes I can get her!

Something's happening here

Connie Sawdey Fremont, Calif. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:17:45 GMT

This is one of the most insightful and intelligent commentaries about each individual's right to freedom of choice and freedom to VOICE their opinions regardless of what so called "all-knowing" pollesters say.
Thank you for sharing your relevant, logical, and honest perception of the New Hamshire people. I am sincerely thankful to them. America, real america, a land of the free still has arms open to greet all.

Something's happening here

Jay Martin, Huntington Beach, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:18:30 GMT

So Brian Williams gets it wrong and the next day suddenly has this incredibly insightful essay into the minds of NH voters? Hindsight is always 20\20, but it looks as if his foresight is not so keen.

Something's happening here

Bernadette Phillips — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:18:52 GMT

This is a remarkably balanced, literate article from a man who is honorable and literate. I have long admired Mr. Williams not only as a journalist, but a man of principle. What a shame that he himself doesn't run for office. I remember a television commentary he delivered a few years ago about his own father , about his values and his honor. If only elected politicians would realize that the electorate is tired of spin, of gobbledygook and of ethics driven by expediency. Thank you Mr.Williams. I imagine that you are able to look yourself in the mirror every morning. Life is too short live without some sort of moral compass.

Something's happening here

legal-mons — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:19:35 GMT

Brian Williams like all in the media are on the Obama train.
You all would rather an inexperienced flip flopper to Mrs. Clinton.Since when you all think so highly of blacks?
I am so amused by the antics of the media.

Something's happening here

Jeff Jameson — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:20:27 GMT

Brian, tell your staff and reporters and other talking head colleagues to stop going on and on Hillary's tears. First of all, half of them are stating as an undeniable fact that her tears made a difference -- AS IF THEY HAVE ANY CLUE. I just heard some stupid talking head say "She teared up," but I have to wonder if this talking head ever watched the clip. There were no tears; instead, her voice simply cracked. John Stewart is the only guy on TV who's actually getting this stuff right, and he's a fricken comedian. You guys are overhyping this and overplaying it and you're exaggerating things way too much. Hate to say it but you're sounding like Fox News. So do us all a big favor and don't forget you're in the business of accuracy, not in the business of exaggeration. Stop being TV people and start being journalists and truth tellers. Have some respect for the intelligence of your viewers.

Something's happening here

viren, fortwayne, Indiana — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:20:42 GMT

Thanks Brian
I think why hillary clinton surprised all of us by winning the primary. What i feel she is after a cause and dedicated to it and that what came out from those emotional moments. I didn't see her as politician at that time she was natural and was in pain. The pain was the way so called agent of change were putting her down, her cause and experience in white house with their speeching and false promises. She felt helpless even more when media exaggerated obama and didn't focus on clinton campaign. Even MSNBC all the time was talking about obama and his speeches and telling people how bad clinton is performing.

She is a woman and i belive she is agent of change because she will be the first woman for president. It is really a sole searching for many american people who advocate for woman right in all over the world and tell other countries about equal rights for woman but hesitate to choose a woman president.
I heard in a talk show when rush limbo said if she wants to feel like a real woman she should fold his clothes.

Something's happening here

Jack, Londonderry, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:20:59 GMT

Brian:

You got it mostly right about us New Englanders. When we see somebody picked on by others we come to their defense. I am angry at Edwards (whom I would have otherwise supported) and Obama for seeming to pile up on Hillary during the debate. They made eye contact and immediately agreed to pummel her. Edwrads denied any advance discussions on that, but it was obvious to those of us who watched. Bullies. Both of them, smug, conceited bullies, guilty of everything they accused her of being. Right or wrong, I got angry and voted accordingly. Tears had nothing to do with it as everybody cries.

Something's happening here

Virginia Kenny — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:21:27 GMT

Brian-
I certainly enjoyed hearing that your father was from Framingham as my father was born there in 1906. I spent many years growing up in various places in Massachusetts, went to school there, and we now have a summer home in Chatham. But, I also lived in New Hampshire during Jr. and Sr. High. I remember how the candidates would show up for primaries and how ridiculous I thought Estes Kefauver looked with his coonskin cap. (Yes, I am that old).

You were right about the media calling the winners much too early, but I don't agree that New England values determined it as much as many women grew very angry with the way television "pundits" were sarcastically commenting on Hillary. I am a McCain supporter, but I felt in particular,one of your TV newscasters, Chris Matthews, was highly insulting of her. Although I would never vote for Hillary, his comments made me very sympathetic to her. And,I'm sure, that type of reporting was what propelled women to, at least in NH, give her their votes.

Something's happening here

Paul David Moses — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:21:33 GMT

If Hillary is cracking under the stress of a faultering campaign, how ready is she for Day 1?
"Mrs. President, there is a losing war going on, the economy is on a rollercoaster and the Republican opposition are already undermining your every move... do you need more tissue?"
I want a stronger person in the Executive Branch.

Something's happening here

Claudia Ritter, Lancaster, PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:22:22 GMT

Amen. I have stopped watching the news, and usually it's a valued part of my day. The media commentators just sit and gossip endlessly all day about the candidates, eschewing a whole world of important current events out there. Worse, though, is them telling us who's going to win before election results have been tallied. Last time I checked, WE vote, they report on who we voted for. They have this little, like, club, and they sit around and chuckle and pretend to consult one another, discuss things as if the person they've decided is going to win, has already won. Chris Matthews and Morning Joe have been talking like Obama is the Democratic nominee, when I won a caucus in a tiny state, Iowa. Excuse me? There's something called California and New York and Michigan and Ohio and Florida and Pennsylvania, where HUGE numbers of people live who haven't voted yet. I was so digusted yesterday AM when Morning Joe, before one break admonished us to stay tuned, becasue "Who is going to be your next President is going to be decided today in New Hampshisre." WHAT? There aren't 48 more primaries and a nationwide election? New Hamphire picks our President for us in January? Yes, I'm done watching MSNBC until the elections are over. The media acts like it's its own little mutually self-reinforcing fan club. They've now made themselves worthless.

Something's happening here

Tom, Beaver Falls — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:24:05 GMT

If you watched Hilary cry the otehr day and didn't think that was the most contrived planned moment you have ever seen...then you are blind!!!

Something's happening here

Ronny Dunn Las Cruces NM 88012 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:24:16 GMT

It would seem to the average american that you media folks would have learned your leasons a long time ago.
Remember the Carey debachles and the Gore cherades.
We are thinking people and we are not easily misled.
And yet you people still keep trying to feed us your slop

Something's happening here

Richard,Salem,NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:25:51 GMT

Brian your kidding yourself into thinking that Hillary won because as you state "The core of the older,native New Hampshire population is still made up of sons and daughters of the original Puritans" She won because of the Southern New Hampshire vote.Rockingham and Hillsborough counties.These counties border Massachusetts with a good majority of former Massachusetts residents.In these two counties she won by 10300 votes her victory margin was only 7480 votes.You would have look pretty hard to find any sons or daughters of the original Puritans in these counties.

Something's happening here

Clyde Norman, Baltimore, MD — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:26:35 GMT

All of the major networks are more interested in analyzing and providing opinions other than basic reporting facts. Just listening daily to NBC, ABC, or CBS, the media bias is obvious in their reporting. If the news is reported accurately, then the public can form their opinion. It would seem if information was being provided by polling the voters, the results would have reflected more accurate information based upon fact.

Something's happening here

Nath, Vancouver, Canada — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:26:44 GMT

Regardless of close victory for Mrs. Clinton, Obama was gracious in his speech and his message continues to be of hope. He may not have a long experience but he is inspirational and wise beyond his years. NH is predominantly white and very much Clinton’s country. It would be interesting to see how more diverse states decide.

It is indisputable that Obama does well with the younger generation, who are the future and need a leader who inspires them plus he can get Republican vote that Mrs. Clinton cannot. Of the three I personally like John Edward and his wife the most and hope that he would at the right time, before it is too late, withdraw and support Obama.

Something's happening here

Marc Zeloof, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:27:39 GMT

1. Well, New Hampshire voters proved that yes, there is a sucker born every minute.

2. I hope my 6 year old daughter wasn't watching "the clip" or she'll never stop crying for anything she shouldn't have.

Something's happening here

Esther, New York City — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:28:38 GMT

To Sue From Bellevue, NE,

Seven years as U.S. Senator, eight as First Lady, plus twenty more working to make this world a better place, is indeed a good deal of experience and a well-rounded one. I scratch my head at those proclaiming eight years of being integral part of the White House and representing it via formal visits to 79 countries and other experiences, is somehow irrelevant. There's no candidate on either side who can claim such formal international experience, nor that of being the ear of a two-term president.

In the recent New Hampshire debate, the sum total of wisdom brought to bear from these experiences came to light as she adeptly responded to a hypothetical situation in which the U.S. might need to cross Pakastani airspace and border to take out Bin Laden via ordinance. Her answer was brilliant in her understanding of neighboring India and its longstanding feud with Pakastan and that a U.S. airstrike enroute might be mistakenly viewed by Imdia as Pakastani ordinace. She then went on to explain how she would deal with this while keeping the mission intact.

Something's happening here

Bobbie Campbell, Terre Haute, Indiana — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:29:00 GMT

Like Hillary much Brian? Whatever happened to unbiased reporting? Hillary bloodied? She drew the first blood and it was not Obama who responded in kind but Edwards. That "humanizing" bit you refer to, complete with "almost" tears? Did you watch it all the way through? Did your station in showing it over and over ad nauseum show the entire thing? No. Were similar sound bites afforded to all the candidates? Not that I recall. Now, thanks to unbiased reporters like yourself a good man's chances--which in our country should be equal to hers--are shot. Oh, and all the footage of Slick Willie on his wife's behalf? Nice touch. If you done the same thing with all of the candidate's spouses that would be one thing but...
I hope that when Shrillary is coronated that she does, in fact, remember your patronage. Before she destroys the country that is.

Something's happening here

Lisa M. Jones, Minneapolis, MN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:29:12 GMT

Brian -- Thank you for your thoughtful essay. I am proud of the people who stood up in New Hampshire and said, "no more!" Polling plays an important role in our political process. However, as Americans we have allowed our media to use poll results to dictate who ought to be our leaders (based on imperfect polling strategies).

The introduction to Thomas Jefferson on Politics and Goverment (see: etext/virginia/edu/jefferson) states: "A press that is free to investigate and criticize the government is absolutely essential in a nation that practices self-government and is therefore dependent on an educated and enlightened citizenry. On the other hand, newspapers too often take advantage of their freedom and publish lies and scurrilous gossip that could only deceive and mislead the people." (http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1600.htm) While it would be inapproriate to suggest that reporting on polling results equates with publishing lies and gossip, it would not be inappropriate to remind the media of its important role in a democratic society. I believe journalists ought to inform our citizens, objectively, rather than report faintly masked editorial opinions about any candidate or event.

This is truly an important election -- not only for the candidates and the media -- but also for the heart and soul of our nation. I hope to see you all step up to the plate and provide fair, accurate, and objective reporting, lest we further disenfranchise those already distanced from the democratic process because they are fed up with the dummy-downed level of our national discourse.

Something's happening here

L. D'Amato, Tampa, Florida — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:30:26 GMT

The voters didn't "defy" the pundits; the voters just do what they are going to do. The pundits need to stop pontificating and let the election take its course.

Something's happening here

Patt, Fargo, ND — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:30:48 GMT

"A colleague of mine contends Obama got caught up in the history he was making. I don't think that's quite fair. The candidate didn't change his message as much as Iowa changed the way we heard it."

That says it all, Mr. Williams.

Media personnel, such as yourself, excuse Sen. Obama from being "caught up" in the moment. Sen. Clinton, well, most of you would have said she had been "caught up." There are no exact moments to compare, but you have all of them on tape.

Review the tapes. Decide for yourself if you gave Sen. Obama a bye when you would not have given Sen. Biden, Sen. Kucinich, Sen. Clinton, etc. one.

You, the media, are the over protective parents toward him. He will stand or fall on his merits, just like all the other kids in the game.

Something's happening here

Lou T. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:31:10 GMT

This may be off topic but I have a concern about Obama; specifically his use of cocaine. Why is this a non- issue? Is it ok for the president of the United States to be a confessed felon? How many times did he use cocaine? What was the largest amount of cocaine was he around? How many drug dealers did he aid and abet? How can this country even consider voting for a man whose moral compass was so broken, and whose moral authority in such question? What are parents going to be able to say to their children if they are caught with cocaine if this man becomes president?

Something's happening here

Fred Smith, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:31:23 GMT

As one of those rare lawyers who is forever optimistic about the potential of America, I am nevertheless also cynical about both politics and the media in this country. On the one hand I think of Mark Twain's quote that "No man's life, liberty or property are safe while Congress is in session." On the other hand, from the 60s to today I have witnessed the slow dilution of true news analysis with self-indulgent editorializing, and the loss of critical thinking in the media. Today, the media seems more like a trained dog that sits up when the right people whistle and toss it a gone. I have no patience with Mr. William's blithe remark of 'We got it wrong and we will screw up again.' Okay--then I will stop following MSNBC and anything written by Mr. Williams.

In the meantime, I am saddened to see that the cynicism of others has become so thick that they will be in denial about a moment of real emotion by Hillary Clinton. Although truly experienced legislators such as Dodd are not going to win the nomination, Hillary's sheer management skills, combined with a live-in senior advisor who happens to be President Clinton, would probably make her a better and more effective President than Mr. Obama, who should return to the presidential race in eight years.

Something's happening here

Rich, Allentown PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:31:42 GMT

Very well said!!!! All of you in the media need to learn from this. This time the voters voice was a bit louder than the press's was and that is a good thing.

Something's happening here

Jorge, Phoenix, AZ — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:31:44 GMT

Thank you Brian and now Lou Dobbs for your candidness about our political process. It is true that we americans of all nationalities have gathered in this country because we are all looking and are part of a free society in which we all are able to listen, speak and act accordingly. Last night we showed to all analysts that it doesn't matter how much you go over and over stories, show historical events from year pasts or just plainly trying to convince people to go with what's suppossed to be, it is not enough for us. We like to be heard we like to make our own minds and this is the real beauty of living in the United States of America. Again, thank you for acknowledging that as human beings the pundits and analysts were incorrect with last nights results. Now if they could only learn from them. That is the real challenge.

Something's happening here

Desiree' Duemling, Colonial Beach, VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:32:04 GMT

What A Wonderful World...to have Hillary as President and Barack as Vice President. The best of both worlds, and, yet again, history in the making. What a concept!

Something's happening here

Casey - Frederick, MD — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:32:23 GMT

Brian, you are correct about making mistakes then probably quickly forgetting them and making the same mistakes again. This isn't the first election results wherein the media and its pundits got it wrong. Think back just a few years. WHY are you trying to call a presidential primary with only ONE primary/caucus (ie, Iowa) completed? ONE state does NOT speak for the other FORTY-NINE -- remember that's why we have TWO houses of Congress with rep's from EACH state? Of course, Iowa is not like N.H. And, Maryland is nothing like Pa. nor Va. despite its geographic location between those two states. And, WHY are you trying to call a race (ie, N.H.) with only 10 percent of the votes in?!?

STOP the (endless) polling and pundits. STOP reporters interviewing reporters or media paid "consultants" and guessing what might happen. I believe the media actually created Hillary's win -- in the face of the predictions, her supporters wanted to make sure she had a chance and showed up in droves.

Frankly, I would have preferred to hear more about ALL of the candidates so I can make my own decision. Unfortunately, even as a political science major, I had no idea from the media news coverage that anyone besides Obama and Clinton were running for president! I'm tired of hearing about how much money Obama and Clinton have amassed and other endless stories about those two. Let's have some real news about ALL of the candidates -- how have they voted on issues (is it consistent with their campaign promises), are they telling the truth about their political track records, etc. If you had covered ALL of the candidates equally, you would probably have had more of a surprise in Iowa and N.H.!

More frankly, I would love a SuperTuesday wherein ALL 50 states held their primaries/caucuses -- therefore ALL 50 states of voters would get to choose their candidate of choice, not just who's leftover for not coming in first or second in Iowa and N.H.!

Just give us the news. There's a reason most Americans love Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow -- neither one of them would have made your debacle.

Something's happening here

gary desmarais, rochester, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:32:24 GMT

You are the first one to hit the nail on the head. My wife and I were thinking the same thing at the same time, Hillary is far too qualified and far too good a choice for the country to be out so soon. We both changed our support to her and had no idea how many others were doing the same.

Something's happening here

henry osmer hill nh — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:32:30 GMT

Nice article Brian.No doubt Obama can talk the talk thank god Hillary can walk the walk as when the going gets tough the tough get going.I have the upmost respect for the Clinton's they understand the common folks and there concerns.Chris Matthews needs to be taken to the wood shed then he and Joe scarboro should join fox news.I watch cnn now.

Something's happening here

Mike Zander Bowie, Maryland — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:32:50 GMT

SO IT IS SAFE TO SAY NH VOTED AGAINST THE MEDIA AND NOT FOR HILLARY? I am not sure the Clinton's wanted to win that way or did it not matter; a WIN is a WIN? Regardless of tears being real or not, a president should be able to hold their head high even in the sign of defeat. I would never want a president that could not face whatever outcomes came at them win or lose. Presidents are supposed to hold up the control, not the country hold them up.

Something's happening here

ava — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:33:02 GMT

RE: Voter Fraud in New Hampshire

It looks like voter fraud may have been responsible for the Clinton win in NH. The Obama camp has been approached by a number of parties that are asking him to request a recount of the votes.

There is a statistically significant discrepancy between exit polls, actual votes counted by hand in the various voting districts, and those tabulated by Diebold tabulator machines. The exit polls and hand counted votes indicate Obama should have won NH by at least 2% to 5%, but the votes tabulated by the Diebold machines (the ones fingered in the 2004 election fraud) had the result flipped to favor Clinton. In addition, several pre-election polls were right on the money for the results of ALL the other candidates in BOTH the GOP and democratic race – except the Obama/Clinton match-up and Ron Paul.

Also, NONE of the Ron Paul votes were counted. As of right now, NH is still reporting that Ron Paul got NO votes, which is not true. He was polling at 5% to 10% before votes were cast.

The Centre for Research on Globalization:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7753

Boston Now:
http://www.bostonnow.com/blogs/boston911truthorg/2008/01/09/major-allegations-of-vote-fraud-in-new-hampshire

The Ben Mosely Blog:
http://benmoseley.blogspot.com/2008/01/do-nh-primary-statistics-show-election.html

Product Reviews
http://www.product-reviews.net/2008/01/09/new-hampshire-vote-fraud-confirmed-ron-paul-votes-not-counted/

Malta Star:
http://www.maltastar.com/pages/msFullArt.asp?an=17896

Something's happening here

Martin Ricks, Orange, MA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:33:07 GMT

In 1960, the American media and too many misguided citizens placed a crown on the head of a man who could turn a good phrase and could look good on television. This despite the man's total lack of true leadership experience. And somehow, despite the Bay of Pigs, drug use, philandering, etc., they passed it off as "Camelot." It seems Mr. Williams, with his Kennedy-era Massachusetts upbringing, has found a new king.

I truly hope that Americans will demand real answers and legitimate policy ideas from Senator Obama before placing the crown upon yet another untested, untried, unqualified head. Senator Obama may indeed mean everything he says. But "yes we can" doesn't mean a thing until it's followed by a realistic and measurable "here's how I'm prepared to do it."

Something's happening here

Roger Schmitz — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:33:32 GMT

Hopefully,this will be a lesson to all voters.As horrendous as all the paid "Political Commentators" predictions were, they now should all try their hands at weather forecasting. AMERICA - DO NOT LET THE MEDIA VOTE FOR YOU!!!

Something's happening here

kat, Jamestown, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:33:53 GMT

Did anyone watch the debate? because I did, and if Hillary was ganged up on I missed it. What I saw was a shrill, defensive and somewhat bitter attack on Obama that went awry. Her attempts to polarize Obama and Edwards by saying that Obama had called him "unelectable" were rebounded back at her when Obama refused to be thrown on the defensive and made it clear that he had a great deal of respect for Senator Edwards. Edwards then retaliated by calling Hillary on her nastiness. If she wasn't ready to throw down with the boys she shouldn't have been the one to go on the attack in the first place. And, while I don't doubt that her teary eyes were genuine, I do think she was able to sway people who were wavering in their support of her after the debates with replay after replay of the moment. Not least of all we should be suspect of her claim to finding her own voice this morning while she infact only began reiterating her own version of Obama's mantra about listening to the people (Let's give her credit; she at least had to admit his position was working. In fact anyone who hasn't followed along to see this sudden change in strategy might even believe her.) It's bound to be an interesting race, but it'd be a more honest one without the media spin.

Something's happening here

Bill Bowen, New York, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:34:00 GMT

One aspect of the NH primary the media should at least be considering is the possibility of election fraud. Consider the following confirmed by blackboxvoting.org after the results were counted and posted county by county last night...

In towns where hand-counted paper ballots were used in NH, 84 of those towns went to Obama, 45 went to Clinton. This is about what the polls were projecting.

In towns where Diebold optical scan machines were used (and no voter verifiable paper trail is available), Clinton won those townships 59-38.

In normal elections, any time an election result falls as far outside the projected result as last night's Democratic primary, the suspicion of fraud is at least raised. Not here. They have come up with every possible excuse for Hillary's "upset" other than fraud.

These numbers posted are not data of a comspiracy theorists. They are the factual data from last night's primary results. You can draw your own conclusions. By most standards, however, these numbers are a bright red flag of election fraud.

http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/71200.html?1199904311

Bill Bowen

Something's happening here

Richard Schwartz, Nashua, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:35:05 GMT

I think everyone is reading way too much into this.

There is a simpler explanation: the polls were wrong. They were all wrong. That would defy Occam's Razor, if not for this: they were all wrong for the same reason.

There is strong evidence for this. The swing in the polls to Senator Obama after Iowa was too much, too fast. Nobody should have believed that he got that much of a bump.

And the swing back to Senator Clinton was way way too much, too fast. Instead of trying to explain the dramatic swing, the media should be eating some crow and explaining why there wasn't really such a big swing to Obama in the first place!

The simple, Occam-satisfying truth is that the bump Obama got from Iowa brought him within 2 or 3 points of Clinton, but did not put him ahead, and the polls mis-measured it.

We in New Hampshire are simply not that fickle to have swung so quickly from a strong lead for Clinton to a strong lead for Obama. We were not so easily swayed by the results in Iowa, and we were not so easily swayed by the seeing Clinton "bloodied", nor by the sight of her showing emotion.

What we are, though, is quite a bit exasperated by the volume and pitch of campaigning this year. We love the opportunity afforded us by our primary, but we don't like the intrusiveness. Within the past two weeks, it got to be so incessant that we stopped answering our phones. We didn't talk to the pollsters.

But that wouldn't be as true for the young (participating in just their first or second primary) and those with the deepest feelings of commitment to a "movement". Those who fit that profile were more likely to be in Senator Obama's camp, and they did answer their phones. They were eager to talk to anyone!

The polls failed to account for this, and the media, so far, has bought it hook line and sinker when Senator Obama's numbers rocketed up.

Flawed polling distorted the pre and post coverage of the primary. That's the story you should cover. I believe that a post-facto analysis of the last round of poll data in comparison to the exit poll data, particularly in the breakdown of how those who had been undecided finally voted, can show that I must be right about this.

Something's happening here

Carol Ann — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:35:41 GMT

I am from Illinois. I support HRC for president and I voted for Barack Obama for the Senate so what would Chris Matthews say about me? I don't think Obama is ready for the Presidency. At least, Clinton has a full term in the Senate completed. I also voted for Carol Mosley Braun, Roland Burris and Jesse White for the Senate, Attorney General and Secretary of State in the past and currently. All 3 of those people are black, even more black than Obama since he has a white mother. I am tired of her genetic contributions being ignored.

Something's happening here

Pamela Scantalides, Boston, MA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:36:47 GMT

Thank you, Brian, for your commentary. Every working woman who has faced the "Boys' Club" in her life, recognized the syndrome immediately on Saturday night when John Edwards sidled up to Barak Obama to shut out Mrs. Clinton as the "Establishment". She handled herself as she will when she is President. She did not back down! Every woman voter in American needs to reflect on the significance of a woman president of the United States. Hillary Clinton will be the embodiment of "Change". She is competent; she is tested; she is electable; she has weathered and suffered Republican attacks of the most vicious nature long before she was the First Lady. The Other Side has pretty much used up all of its ammunition against her. She has specific plans; she has well-thought out time lines. The crowds of voters are out to send a message about how critical this election is, not about how 'sainted' Barak Obama is. And by the way, since Barak Obama is channelling Bobby Kennedy and Martin Luther King, is anyone going to mention the true reality about Bobby Kennedy (and John, for that matter). They were not saints, they were pragmatists. Hillary Clinton's presidency is long overdue for this country and we will be well-served by it. I only pray that the electorate is smart enough to realize she will turn this country around.

Something's happening here

Nancy Grogan, Estero FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:37:06 GMT

Mr. Williams, thank you for your superb mea culpa. I only hope that it will serve as an effective chastisement to your peers. Until now, I have been far more angered and offended by the media's contempt for American voters than anything any candidate has to say. You (almost) captured the entire situation and hopefully, will provide more food for thought to undecided voters, and perhaps most importantly re-engage the discouraged voter who has come to take it for granted that their vote won't make a difference.

But it amazes me that there is one element that no one in the media - including yourself - has grasped about what I believe happened in New Hampshire, despite the evidence staring you in the face. All the pundits have repeated the exit poll statistics ad nauseum that not only was it women voters who carried Senator Clinton, but women over 60. WAKE UP! This is the generation of women who fought their entire adult lives for:

* equal rights
* equal pay
* the ERA, etc.

This generation of women literally left their blood in the streets. This is the generation of women who accomplished what their daughters and granddaughters can take so much for granted in their lives today and can't even imagine what it was like for women 40 or 50 years ago. It is this generation that defines the independent voter regardless of party affiliation. It is THIS GENERATION that knows that electing Hillary Clinton (and adding Madame President to our lexicon) would be the jewel in the crown of the Women's Movement. We may have moved past marching en mass with placards and bull horns, but we are no less committed to our unfinished goals.

Something's happening here

Jane Hart, San Jose, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:37:39 GMT

Any sister, daughter, mother or wife knows that Mrs. Clinton was sincere with her "emotions." Yes, we all have emotions. Maybe if people including world leaders exhibited their "emotions" the world would be a better place. BRAVA to the women of New Hamphire who stood against the pundits and "emoted" their ways to the polls.

Something's happening here

Don Bennett — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:37:42 GMT

Dont'b blame the media for this surprise. If you do that, you'll have to blame everyone else for thinking this was a slam-dunk for Obama. The fact is, this is what keeps us interested in politics and what makes our process great. Yes, newspeople editorialize, but they aren't ignorant just because they can't predict the unpredictable. And don't be so sensitive to every comment, or call them all biased and rooting for a specific candidate. The fact is, it is evident from most of the above responses that we all have biases. Isn't it great, on the other hand, that we have interest, and that we can seriously digest all these primaries. Then, hopefully, each of us will make an informed decision and vote for the candidate that we believe will lead strongly, always keeping in mind the bests interest of all the people.

Brian, I appreciated this well written article and the candid insight you express day after day. I can always enjoy it without attaching motives to it.

Something's happening here

rob earl, new york, ny — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:39:04 GMT

This campaign has finally devolved into soap opera. Instead of substantive ideas and answers it's become touchy, feely.

It's surprising only that it happened so soon. There are still ten months to go! I can't wait.

Something's happening here

Change Please, Ashburn, VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:39:25 GMT

Did anyone really read Brian's words? Beautiful soaring ... to describe Obama and boisterous inelegant and two imperfect politicians to describe Clinton. Isn't someone still trying to influence our thinking? I haven't made up my mind yet and may even decide to vote Republican but I am sure tired of the media trying to influence my thinking. Please leave your personal likes out of reporting the news.

Something's happening here

Gene Wright Moorhead, MN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:39:46 GMT

It may have been real...only one person knows for sure or maybe a few, if it was a planned actre fooled a number of NH residents.

Something's happening here

Kathleen McCormick Springfield Ma — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:40:04 GMT

To the media...its time to let the American public decide who should run the country. The women of this country have had to live with the decisions of man for to long. Now, its our time...you go Hil take this country back to greatness.

Something's happening here

Don Heath — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:40:04 GMT

The on-air talent looked pretty silly last night, and quickly sought redemption assigning culpability to the campaigns themselves, and to the pollsters. I always assumed news providers were responsible for their content. Although I usually like Keith Oberman, he seemed particularly awkward. Perhaps it was his piece targeting the 30 seconds following Hillary's fatigue. He had some arcane point about her attacking Obama indirectly, which of course is what all the candidates seek to do at this point in the campaign. You guys looked pretty silly and unbalanced. It will forever change the degree of credibility I'll give you. I appreciate this article Brian, and Mr.Brokaw's comments to Mr.Matthews last night.

Something's happening here

Brandy Chicago, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:40:47 GMT

Unfortunately, New Hampshire just wasn't ready for an Obama and with a woman in tears how could they not vote for Hillary. Hillary is like a girl that wants to play on a boys varsity football team but cries when she gets tackled. New Hampshire was the proverbial mom fixing her wound.

Something's happening here

Denise Ford — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:41:19 GMT

It is plain to see that this writer is pushing for Obama. The article made it quite clear where the writer stood in his views. I applaud the voters in New Hampshire for their courage to vote for Hillary Clinton and not for the "hype" and the "pep rally" tales that Obama so elegantly delivers.

Something's happening here

Lois Reeves, Houston, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:41:21 GMT

Thanks Brian, I was so sick of hearing how Hillary had lost before the election started, then I got mad and can't wait to vote for Hillary. Chris Wallace need to go.

Something's happening here

Ed Myre — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:41:43 GMT

President Obama? President Guiliani? There is no way
that can resonate to many Americans. I am predicting
that it will be Hilary Clinton as president and he will select John McCain as his vice president. For
the good of the USA, Clinton/McCain will win. Clinton
will need McCain to solve the problem in Iraq, while
she concenrates in the economy, health care, etc.

Something's happening here

cgreen — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:41:45 GMT

Am really tired of the whole "Hillary cried" narrative. Just stop it - and talk about issues. Maybe the NH voters are smarter than the pundits - looking at substance. I say all this as an Edwards supporter: the coverage of the candidates is sadly lacking in comparing Senate votes and real issues.

Something's happening here

Jerry Sitzlar, Lorton, VA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:42:30 GMT

What really happened is very simple. It was the weather! When the weather is good, such as the annual "January Thaw" that was and is being observed in the North East (NOT Global Warming), more of the older generation get out. So, Obama still would have won in a landslide except the weather was basically nice (for New Hampshire), which prompted more elderly people and especially women to go to the polls, negating Obama's lead among the young.

It is this older generation that has what Brian is talking about. The younger Democrats have none of that, they will only want to be with a perceived winner (remember Howard Dean?).

On the Republican side, an elder member of the older generation won that for the same reason...weather and feeling sorry for the old guy trying to make yet another comeback.

A very negative blood bath is now going to really erupt between Obama and Clinton with neither giving up. Dirt (real or not) is going to be found everywhere on both. The Democrat campaign has to go that route because there is no substance in either of those two candidates. The Republicans had better be standing by taking notes.

Something's happening here

Gilda Madonna Regan, Lawrenceville, GA 30043 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:43:39 GMT

To ALL MEDIA especially Chris Matthews,

EAT ALL YOUR WORDS! I was really upset the way you talked or covered Hillary and Barack. It is very obvious that you people hate Sen. Clinton, is it because she is a woman and more intelligent than all of you people? I hope that you people learned a lesson. I am had been very loyal to NBC but after what all of you in NBC have done, I don't I want to watch and listen to you anymore. YOU BIAS Just like Fox news to George Bush.

Gilda Regan
Mother and A Wife

Something's happening here

Asonglefac Nkemleke, Washington, D.C. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:44:02 GMT

Brian,
Thank you for a well thought out and well written reflection. My question though: Do you think the time is over for pundits to direct election outcomes in this country or is New Hampshire just one unique experience?

Something's happening here

Dot, Illinois — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:44:12 GMT

I have been a loyal watcher of NBC for over 40 years. For the past few weeks, I have been reading and commenting on the stories in First read.

I have said from the beginning that the coverage by the media of this campaign was terrible. Last night's debacle only reinforced that thought. From the beginning, in the media's eyes, the race has always been solely between Senators Clinton and Obama. At one time Senator Clinton was proclaimed the "inevitable nominee." Two experienced, extremely qualified candidates, Senators Biden and Dodd were given next to no media coverage. When I complained I was told "when we get a story on them we run it." Whatever happened to going out and GETTING a story instead of waiting for it to come to you? These two candidates have now dropped out of the race, due in large part I think, to the lack of coverage by the media. The media decided that the best story would be to have the race be between two "firsts" with celebrity status. Other candidates were too boring and didn't make as good copy as did the "frontrunners."

Pages were devoted to the silly back and forth sparring between these two candidates; Senator Clinton's laugh deserved coverage; misspelling the name of a town in a Clinton memo deserved a column, etc. You get the picture, I hope.

I know he is a collegue and friend of yours, but Tim Russert's performance on the Phil debate was terrible. He was almost gleeful as he pulled his "gotcha" question on Senator Clinton about what her husband had once said.

Reporters can't refrain from asking questions that give them a chance to voice their opinion rather than simply reporting the news. Today, "could this be the beginning of a gender war"(I am paraphrasing)between Senator Clinton's supporters and those who favor Senator Obama? That's not reporting news--that's trying to stir up controversy, something that seems to be the thing the media loves covering most. If none exists, stir something up.

And then of course, last night. Why all the blah blah blah BEFORE ANY RESULTS WERE IN? What was wrong with waiting until accurate information was available? Then the public would have received correct results and the media wouldn't have looked so silly.

The funny thing is I think the media has miscalled states and elections in the past, yet they don't seem to have learned anything. As I said in a post to First Read, I would rather have a slow, accurate story than a speedy incorrect one.

Does anyone ultimately take responsibility for all of this--because reporting the news accurately is a huge responsibility. Or will it continue to be business as usual?

Something's happening here

Andy B, New York NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:44:42 GMT

Excellent piece, Brian, and a refreshing mea culpa from the press. But lets not go overboard in confusing the messenger with the message. What drove the press and the pundits over the last week was the astonishing poll data showing ever-widening leads for Obama, and overflow enthusiastic crowds for Obama. The job of political analysts is to draw conclusions from the facts they have, and until last night the obvious and reasonable conclusion was that Hillary was going to get clobbered and that her campaign would be in trouble if that happened. The pundits didn't just make that up. Sure, there was a big swing in the last 48 hours -- driven most likely by a desire to avoid an early Obama coronation. But that was a reaction to facts on the ground, not to the opinions of the commentators. The average voter really doesn't parse Chris Matthews' snarky remarks all that closely.

Something's happening here

randy barge, philadelphia, PA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:45:14 GMT

Stop blaming the pundits! They simply reported what the polls were saying. If there has been anyone in this campaign who has benefited from what passes as journalism these days, it has been Hillary Clinton. From the very beginning the press designated Hillary as the front runner based on the same fickle polls that everyone is now decrying.

Something's happening here

charles, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:45:35 GMT

Seriously folks, I saw some hope in Obama after the 7 gruesome long years of bush-cheney. I have been looking back Clinton years -- how good it was for us ordinary Americans -- thinking if it will ever be possible to undo what bush-cheney has committed crimes to this country and to this world. Of the three democratic candidates, I really hope Obama wins at the end without running too much negative campaign; if not Obama, then Edwards; if Hillary wins, I may not even vote in this year's election at all. I am profoundly disappointed in her for her choice of negative campaign and her big pocket corporate campaign funds. What can she do, what will be different about her, how better will she be than the negative campaign run by bush-cheney? Frankly I don't see much hope in her, under her America will never be able to undo, even partially, the bush-cheney nightmare.

Something's happening here

Shannon Hobbs — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:45:48 GMT

A women's view on what the pollsters/media missed: The barrage of analysis and commentary on Hillary's showing of emotion reminded all of us baby boomer women that there is still a double standard. Hillary has been criticized endlessly for acting like a man and as soon as she shows some emotion she is criticized for acting like a woman. We know how hard all of us have worked to achieve the progress we have made so far to break down barriers for women. The piece that the pollsters have missed is that the women under 40 are the benefactors of our hard work and don't recognize what is happening.

Something's happening here

Mindy Moore Chatsworth, Ca. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:47:04 GMT

I enjoyed reading this analysis of the stunning results in New Hampshire. However, I would like to say to Brian Williams and others that there is another movement out there besides the phenomenon that is Barack Obama. That is the power of women to change elections. Women gave Hillary Clinton support in huge numbers and that is a big part of why she defied the polls and pundits and won.

Maybe people forget middle aged women baby boomers like myself. I think of how Hillary Clinton put aside her own dreams and became a political wife, loyal and steadfast in support of her husband's political aspirations. Many women in my generation did the same thing, although not on a public or grand scale. Maybe that's why women got so angry when they say Hillary being devalued and mocked and derided and disrespected. Who among all of women has not felt discarded as we get older? I think something deep and powerful was touched in a lot of women over 40 when they saw the beating that Hillary was taking from all sides. So they came to her defense. This is her time. This is her moment. I also happen to think it was her finest moment. She triumphed over adversity by showing what she is made of. For me, it was quite emotional watching her go through this trial by fire. But she came out a winner. I am so happy for her. She definitely won me over. Sometimes, adversity can bring out the best in a person and it did so with Hillary Clinton.

Go ahead, Hillary. Enjoy your moment. Because there is another movement afoot in this country. It's the power of women who have known discrimination, unfairness, despair, marginalization. The commentators and pundits would do well to listen to us. Because we are also a powerful force for change. Barack Obama has energized and inspired many young people, but there are the sometimes forgotten older women who still want to be relevant and important. Yesterday, they made their voices heard. The Republicans should take note - you attack and trash women at your peril. If they try their usual slash and burn politics this time, they may well get burned.

Something's happening here

Julie - PBG, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:48:19 GMT

I was a supporter of John Edwards up until this last week in NH. I didn't like how everyone jumped on the 'change' bandwagon and acted like Hillary was status quo. Come on! A WOMAN as president is NOT status quo. I remember the last time a woman ran for Vice President - I think I was - oh - 7 years old. I am now 33. I don't want to go through my entire life wondering if a woman could be President.
It could be decades before another woman has enough clout and experience, so I truly hope she maintains this momentum and breaks through that glass ceiling.

Something's happening here

Barbara Frank, Fontanelle, Iowa — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:49:13 GMT

After a whole new experience at Iowa caucus and watching the outcome of New Hampshire it makes me want to ask. What about the other candidates on both sides? The news never talks about Bill Richardson, Ron Paul and whom ever else you don't talk about. How are these people suppose to get a chance when the media is so wrapped up in Clinton and Obama. We had a Clinton once and don't need another one. Does anyone really think that Hillery and Bill would be any different. Birds of a feather you know.. Lets hear something besides Clinton, Obama and the poles idea of who they want to win. I.E. What is the other candidates doing?

Something's happening here

CHARLES MALOLEY BUCKEYE AZ. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:50:22 GMT

All the know it alls at MSNBC got it wrong , their dislike for Mrs. Clinton stands out like a second nose. Thank you B. Williams and the old pro Mr.Brokaw for reporting the news like the pros they ARE

Something's happening here

Paul, Los Angeles — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:51:09 GMT

The headline to your story on the msnbc.com homepage is offensive. The voters did not "defy" the polls and the media. Instead, the media and the polls got it wrong. The media should report the story -- its role is not to determine the outcome.

Something's happening here

Cory Balch Austin,tx — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:51:39 GMT

New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008

The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.

As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.

Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.

Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.

"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
January 9, 2008

With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.

CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT

The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.

Something's happening here

Terry L. Colvin, San Gabriel, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:51:48 GMT

The only thing I blaqme the media for in this opinion poll meltdown is their failure to be students of history. Obama has fallen victim to something I call the "Tom Bradley Factor." Bradley, was a popular African-American mayor of Los Angeles when 20 years ago he twice ran for governor of California against San Diego Mayor Pete Wilson. Both times evey major poll showed Bradley with comfortable two-digit leads over his opponent going int ot he final days of the campaign. Both time he lost by wide margins. Why? Simply put, voters have demonstrated their unwillingness to answer pollsters candidly when copnfronted with a choice btween white and black candidates. Twice, Californians lied to the questioners in laerge enough numbers to throw the poll predictions off base because they are unwilling to say they won't vote for a black candidate because of lingering doubts over race. I believe the same thing happened in New Hampshire. Otherwise liberal-minded voters told the pollsters they would vote for Obama, but then cast ballots for Clinton based on the reason that dares not speak its name -- racism.

Something's happening here

John Yorks — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:51:53 GMT

Or does it have something to do with the Diebold optical ballot reading machines? Many are already talking about this, as it was discussed (outiside the main media mostly) after 2000, and 2004. Go back and look at the NH 1988 results with Bush Sr. coming out of a loss in Iowa - and somehow winning against all odds in NH. Electronic voting was used then, too.

Or, maybe every poll was wrong then as today. I don't know. But I would trust the system more if it was done all by hand counted paper ballots.

Please investigate. Thanks.

Something's happening here

Votes of Simpathy, Oregon — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:52:01 GMT

I suspect the media got it all wrong because they forgot to factor in that woman like to vote with emotion. Shed tears and earn simpathy votes is the moral to this win for Clinton. Maybe if the men running for president cried when they were losing they would earn simpathy votes as well.

Something's happening here

John Randall Smith - Waycross, Georgia — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:52:12 GMT

Good objectivity, Brian. You're my favorite newscaster because of your objectivity and willingness to eat some crow. Chris and Joe need to tighten up in that area. I do realize that their shows encourage more subjectivity, but their distaste for the Clintons is far too obvious on the air. I still will start my day with "Morning Joe" and end it with "Hardball" because those guys are just plain fun to watch and their political saavy is sharp (except in the last two days). A little crow-eating by them would go a long way.

Not sure who I'm pulling for at this time, but I sure pull for the underdogs when I also agree with their views.

Something's happening here

Anna, Buffalo, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:52:22 GMT

Brian, I would have liked you to name the "perfect Politician" you must have been thinking of in comparison to the "imperfect Clintons". I will wait for your answer, but I probably won't hold my breath.
I am glad Hillary won New Hampshire. I will vote for her, not because I feel sorry for her, but because I feel sorry for us. What George Bush and the Republican Party has done to our country this past seven years has been devastating. We need a president that KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE DOING! It is that simple.

Something's happening here

Dana C., Westford, MA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:52:59 GMT

Yes the media and the pollsters got it wrong again. And sadly as Brian admits, they will do it again. But why? They see their mistakes, they examine it on the air in news stories,and weeks or months later we see it again.
As for Hillery's tears, bravo, nice piece of acting. The days leading up to the "tears", the media had been commenting on how cold and unemotional Hillery is, and then Obama's comment about Hillery at the debate; "liked enough". I could see the "tears coming from miles away.

Something's happening here

Cynthia Gonza.ez, Austin, TX — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:53:33 GMT

Thank you Brian your understanding and willingness to hold your own industry accountable for their overzealousness is refreshing. Now if we could see that in the campaigns! I feel Clinton has been unfairly crushed for being a woman; she's definitely in a Catch 22 position. If she doesn't show emotion, she's cold and unfeeling; if she shows emotion, she's weak and faking it! I think Obama is in the same situation, but his issues is race. It would be nice just to hear what they plan to do to enact change. In that regard I think Clinton is doing a better job. Charm will only take Obama so far and his history of negative campaigns will eventually catch up with him.
I would like to see a Clinton/McCain showdown in the end. For the first time we might not be voting for the lesser of two evils.

Something's happening here

Kevin, Madison, WI. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:53:44 GMT

Let’s talk reality. The only thing that Clinton came back from was a loss in Iowa. The drama in New Hampshire was the result of over interpretation and inaccurate polls. If any of the poll results are to be believed, she was winning New Hampshire before the Iowa primary. The realization of that victory does not deserve the moniker of “The Comeback Kid”. I recall Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann talking last night about how Bill Clinton anointed himself with that title when he lost his lead and came in second in New Hampshire. They said the media and the public let him get away with it, and that we are hopefully too savvy now to allow that to happen. Well we are…so quit it.
It should also be noted that if the post-Iowa polls were wrong, then Clinton’s “humanizing moment” had nothing to do with her victory. Sure, it makes great fodder. Hillary Clinton lets down her guard and everyone sees her humanity/vulnerability. The voters realize that she is human after all, she finds her new Voice™, and she is transformed. It’s a nice story, but it didn’t happen. She won because she was always winning. There is no new message, no new Voice™, no transformation, no Comeback Kid.

Something's happening here

Jeff, Portland, OR — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:53:44 GMT

I think this is simpler than most think. It is the Bradley Phenomenon plain and simple. And you all thought racism was dead didn't you? It's alive and well in NH. Let's see how the rest of the states play out on this.

Something's happening here

C Norman, Baltimore, MD — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:53:48 GMT

It would be best if the networks would report the facts and let the listeners decide for themselves. The bias of broadcasters with a national audience does not make for accurate reporting.

Something's happening here

Amy Wilton CT — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:54:44 GMT

Following closely the national campaigns, as an Independent and fence siting radical reformist with heavy liberal democratic influences, I understand the value of whether I choose to reregister as a democrat to participate in the primary February 5th is of great value. The race is close between the democratic contenders and my vote and my influence on others will have effect. So who do I favor? I have loved Hillary since she stood tall against all odds and was hammered by the AMA but she tried and she tried with dignity. Than there was Bill's poor judgement call's. Again, Hillary handled a very public, very personal crisis with tact and dignity. That's very Presidential. I understand the tactic to hold off on the vision package, understanding the political vulnerabilities but something needs to be put out and quickly. Obama, well he has a role to play and Obama is playing it well and he has an important role in our future. My interests focused on Richardson experience and ideologies and Edwards ringing the bell for the poor and soon to be poor and the stranglehold corporate America has on all decision making. I would like to see Dean take some initiative swiftly and steer the party to the issues that need to be seriously examined and some plans introduced to address the issues. I will be paying very close attention as every thinking, compassionate mind should also. Far as the republicans go, there time has come and gone but I am sure looking forward to Johnny boy giving Richie Rich a lesson in true American democracy. Rudy needs to stop embarrassing his party and check that ego at the door as he exits with some attempt at a dignified departure. Personal note; Joe, thank you for standing tall you have yet a much larger footprint to leave behind full throttle ahead. And perhaps others can take a page from Bidens Bible of political etiquette and strategies. One fact is blatantly obvious now, a sincere tangible movement of cries for justice and sanity are taking root. Help is coming, we must hold on to hope and our frustration and even rage and unite to really bring positive change in everyone's life. We are all Americans and together we can and will make it better.
P.S. Remeber Brian and Alexandra, "equal time" rules apply.

Something's happening here

Mary, Lakewood, Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:54:57 GMT

Has it occurred to anyone that the voters may have finally decided that elections should not be decided until election day? Personally, I've been called twice in the past 15 years by polsters and lied both times. No one owes a polster the truth.

Something's happening here

Andrew Dansicker, Baltimore, Maryland — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:55:02 GMT

This "debacle" merely illustrates the unholy power of the press -- if you had told Obama two weeks ago that he would finish within three points of Hilary, it would have been considered a huge victory for Obama. But after Iowa, a combination of the press's decision to annoint Obama and some questionable polling led to a sudden flip-flop in the predictions which was flat-out wrong. Hence, Hillary's "amazing" comeback (which, when viewed over the past few months, was hardly any type of comeback!).

Something's happening here

nantaba — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:56:49 GMT

Hillary won because she is smart NOT BECAUSE SHE CRIED. Thank you the good people of NH for making your own mind and not relying on the media. Thank you for taking your civic duties seriously. Good article Brian however, like one writer said earlier, you had a lot to do with this as a media person. Now let the best candidate win!!

Something's happening here

Marie Bright, Bluffton, SC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:56:53 GMT

The media did get it wrong last night. However, it is still the responsibility of each citizen to research each candidate and vote for the one they belive is most qualified for the job. We have become a lazy society and in reality the bulk of our nation waits for the media to tell them who to vote for. The nastiness and lies of all political campaigns get repeated over and over until people just believe what they hear in the media and don't even bother to make up their own minds. If only the citizens of this country would vote for the most qualified candidate instead of the most likeable perhaps we wouldn't be in such a domestic and international mess right now.

Something's happening here

Diane — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:58:12 GMT

Brian, please don't give people excuses for their lack of integrity. Think about what they are saying. It sounds as if they took their anger towards the media out on Barrack Obama...If so, people are really in need of emotional and most likely, spiritual healing more than we realize. This is really disappointing!

Something's happening here

Sharyn Baker — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:58:36 GMT

I am 62 and a woman of the ERA movement. I am a registered Indepndent and I will not have any media darling tell me who I should vote for because the tide is going one way or another. What the media is NOT doing is asking tough, hard but respectful questions of any of the candidates. The debates are just plain silly...they should NOT be labled debates but question and answer sessions. The questioners do not go in depth on the issues and the candidates know they only have to last for a 30 second sound bite. Where are the substance answers from the candidates to issues on Iraq, Iran, our national debt, our muddled economy, the lack of solid environmental policy, the rediculousness of No Child Left Behind, our Immigration issues,& jobs leaving the US???? ...If you really want to make news then start by getting candidates to answer the questions. Ask how they will address these all important issues. And when they slide into promoting themselves stop them and ask for answers and not advertizements.........I bet you a dollar you can't ask a question of a canidate and get a yes or no asnwer on anything except maybe they would like free time on the news.

Something's happening here

Jeff Langham — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:59:39 GMT

Great insight Brian,
I think people became emotinally connected to Ms Clinton in the debate when John Edwards decided to hold Obama and slug Ms Clinton.
The people of NH didn't like to see a lady so bloodied and bullyied.
She was also more specific than she has been about her opponents records

Thanks
Jeff

Something's happening here

Ann M Sweeney Laconia, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:59:45 GMT

Brian, Compliments on your piece. I do hope the media learned to respect that voters make their own choice.
Ann M. Sweeney, Laconia, NH

Something's happening here

Cleo, Louisville, KY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:00:30 GMT

The media was decidedly cruel and I for one did not like it. No matter if you are for her or Obama they should both be treated with respect. I have not decided who I am for but I know this I thought the media did a terrible job after Iowa. They all but declared Sen. Clinton dead and done. If we must cover the race issue and what effect that had on voting then we too must cover the gender issue as well. I'd like to see a woman with as little experience as Sen. Obama try for the presidency and given that kind of positive coverage. That said he is truly exciting and dynamic. And really could either candidate be as bad as President Bush. Whoever wins the primary will have my vote and my support but wouldn't it be nice if the media stopped trying to decide for us. After all you didn't do such a great job last time on the election or the war coverage.

Something's happening here

Glenn, Sacramento, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:01:10 GMT

I am not as convinced as others that this was a either a mandate for Hillary Clinton or a rebuffing of Borak Obama. Perhaps, just perhaps, the independents of NH looked at the polls and decided Obama did not need their vote and cast their respective vote for John McCain. Maybe if the pre-voting polls were different, the results also would present a different story.

Something's happening here

Carol Ann — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:01:23 GMT

I wonder if the same people who claim that Clinton only got the support she got because of her husband have ever claimed that W only got the support he got because of his father.

Something's happening here

Christine Venable — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:02:36 GMT

Well put.

Something's happening here

Mike Harrison Bloomfield Mi — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:03:24 GMT

Mr. Williams:
I find it interesting that you admitted to the fact you "lobbied" your producer to include the segment showing Mrs. Clinton shedding tears because of her situation. If that inclusion in the news had the effect of voters feeling sorry for her (who isn't affected by a woman's tears), did you just not admit to affecting the outcome of a political race that should be decided on the issues? If that piece had not been broadcast, would the outcome been different?
And if so, why would you do such a thing without thinking about the effect it might have?

As I watched that piece on your program, I commented to my wife that no matter what the polls say, Mrs. Clinton will now will NH. Not because she should but because she cried.

While I am an independent voter and have not made a choice of who I would vote for, I do now wonder what would happen if Mrs. Clinton did win in November. After a tough day at the (presidential) office and being faced with one of the many crises the President has to deal with, would she step up and do something or just shed a few tears and hope the situation comes out in our favor. Very frightening thought.

Reminds me of the line from the movie "League of Women" when Tom Hanks uttered the line "There's no crying in baseball". If she does ultimately win the Presidency, I hope someone makes her watch that movie and remember "There's no crying in the White House". Step up. Be a person. Do something. Leave the tears for someone who can afford them.

Something's happening here

James Stafford Wilmette, Illinois — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:04:37 GMT

Brian, you are the CLASS TV anchor in America. You know how to speak, how to dress, how to deliver your opinion and how to explain what is happening. Your analysis on the voting on Tuesday tells it all. In my judgment, "are the voters of the USA ready for a 'non white' candiate"? We shall see in the next few months. Great job Brian.

Something's happening here

James A. Butler — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:04:44 GMT

Great write up Chris. Journalists such as yourself are a refereshing dose of truth when America really needs it. It should also be noted that Hillary didn't actually weep, she welled up and her words temporarily caught in her throat. What she displayed was weariness and frustration that she was not being portrayed as she felt she should have been. Americans should ask themselves why anyone would submit themselves to the unimaginable fish bowl that Senator Clinton finds herself in unless they truly believed they could make a difference. While I believe Barak Obama is sincere in his believe that he is the candidate of change, in the final analysis, I think his style minus substance routine will eventually become much more transparent then it has up to this point. I just wish people could make a decision without personally attacking people they only know from TV soundbites.

Something's happening here

Ron, Oregon — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:04:52 GMT

Why is it that the national media is focusing so much on the popular vote, and not on what matters, the delegates earned. Sure Obama won Iowa, but he only gained one more delegate than Clinton or Edwards. And Hillary won NH, but Obama received the same number of pledged delegates as she did (9) and actually received more total delegates than Clinton. And why doesn't the media talk about how all candidates don't start out on equal footing in the race for the nomination. Clinton had over a hundred delegate lead (39 coming from NY) over the rest of the field before the start of this election season, thanks to "super" delegates. I think that the networks should give the public a service and spend a little time explaining the whole process.

Something's happening here

Jeff Loewi, New York City, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:04:54 GMT

Excellent analysis. Thank you. Now, please, tell that running mouth Chris Mathews (and his 12-0 for Obama cohorts) to apologize for worshipping at a premature electulation.

Something's happening here

J.A.Laukaitis — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:06:14 GMT

It appeared to me that the political comentators were trying to swing the election. I watched the debates carefully and it always seemed to me that Hillary was the more reasonable and mature candidate.
Not making claims that will be impossible to implement.From her perfomances in the debates I felt she truly should have won, so I was very surprised to here the polls and pundits beating up on her. I think the country needs a person of her intelligence and values. This country is ready for Hillary and Hlliary is ready for this country.

Something's happening here

Janet Angelo — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:06:20 GMT

Brian, you're the best and I've always thought so. You have the sharpest mind combined with the greatest depth of humanity and compassion as compared to all the anchors, news pundits, and talking heads. What a well-written article, and I find it interesting to note that it was YOUR hunch to have that touching moment of Hillary's as shown in Andrea's report be aired. Your news instincts are spot on accurate!

However, I will say that I agree with the poster above me named Richard Wesson when he wrote this: "What we are interested in is analysis of issues rather then what is interesting to you and your staff. We understand that you are interested in the strategy but we are more interested in the issues e.g what is position difference on the war between Clinton and Obamba, who would possibly be in their cabinets, what is is the differences in their tax policies. While the inside talk is sometimes interesting the constant focus is not."

Brian, I am a freelance editor in Florida, and I would give my RIGHT ARM to be able to work with you; that would be my dream come true! If ever you need a good freelance editor for any reason, I am already registered as one of your News VIPs so it should be easy to find me!

Thanks for your wisdom, your intelligence, and your flawless writing ability. Keep up the good work!

Something's happening here

Greg Plymouth, NH — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:08:01 GMT

Brian,
I am of NE stock, also. Actually, New Hampshire as I was born & brought up in New Hampshire.
You were right in mentioning the changing culture and makeup of New Hampshire. Therein, I believe was the real reason for the turnaround of the actual voting from the polls. There are great numbers of Massachusetts expatriots that have moved North and the polling pundits were not taking them fully into consideration. I give credit to Clinton's supporters that were willing to get out in the smaller towns to get out the vote.
Interesting that there were so many more Democratic voters than Republican in what used to be a stanch Republican state.

Something's happening here

jonathan scobie — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:08:17 GMT

It's not as if Sutton had a handful of voters like some other districts - a total of 386 people voted yet we are led to believe that not one voted for Ron Paul? Judging by the Iowa results, around 10% of residents would be expected to vote for the Congressman, returning a total of around 38 votes in this district. Let's be ultra-conservative and say just 5% support Paul - he'd still get 19 votes - but he got absolutely none whatsoever. Is there something wrong with this picture?

Greenville also tallied 144 votes yet not one for Congressman Paul.

Anyone else in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul needs to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

Diebold voting machines also did Congressman Paul no favors last night - compared to hand counted ballots Giuliani gained just short of 0.5% from electronic voting whereas Paul lost over 2%, which was the difference between finishing 4th and 5th, as this graph documents.

Mitt Romney profited the most from the Diebold swing, he received 7% more votes compared to hand counted ballots.

In the Democratic race the Diebold voting machines clearly swung the primary in Hillary Clinton's favor at the expense of Barack Obama, who had a commanding lead over the New York Senator going into the contest.

Zogby polling numbers had Obama leading Clinton by a whopping 42/29 per cent, yet Clinton eventually took the primary by three per cent.

"If I was Barack Obama, I'd certainly not have conceded this election this quickly," writes The Brad Blog. "I'm not quite sure what he was thinking. And as far as offering an indication of whether he understands how these systems work, and the necessity of making sure that votes are counted, and counted accurately, it does not offer a great deal of confidence at this hour."

"While I have no evidence at this time --- let me repeat, no evidence at this time --- of chicanery, what we do know is that chicanery, with this particular voting system, is not particularly difficult. Particularly when one private company --- and a less-than-respectable one at that, as I detailed in the previous post --- runs the entire process."

Something's happening here

RA Johns, Indianapolis, IN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:08:22 GMT

I can't believe anyone would buy her attempt at tears! I am so afraid that Clinton will become president. There is such a trail of lies and deceit - years of it. Tim Russert reported that people in NH felt her campaign was the dirtiest. How did this happen? How did Obama go from double digits to three behind????????????

Something's happening here

BRUCE BAILEY HUNTINGTON, WV — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:08:24 GMT

When I WATCHED THE NEWS ON NBC I THOUGHT I HAD LOST 0R
SLEPT THROUGH ELECTION DAY I DON`T REMBER VOTING BUT I
SPOUSE I MUST HAVE BECAUSE BRIAN WILLAMS SAID OBAMA HAD WON NH AND THE ELECTION WAS OVER AND I THUGHT TO MY SELF.WHAT HAPEND? TO THE OTHER 50 STATES.

Something's happening here

Michele, Southbury, Conn. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:08:26 GMT

Smart of NBC to ask the well-liked Brian Williams to "fall on his sword" for the people who called the shots on how to cover the New Hampshire primary. America wants to know, NBC, why did your poll reviews become the big story? How about getting headlines from actual news -- the exciting campaign activities, the inspiring venues, the meaningful messages of the presidential candidates? It may not be as dramatic as crystal-balling (and more expensive), but at least you get to keep your credibility. I regretted switching over from CNN to watch MSNBC coverage last night, announcing, "Clinton shocked the world." The only ones shocked were you media folks. I'm an NBC regular, but you guys really let us down. This historic campaign is not the time to get shoddy. Get some of those personalities at MSNBC off the set and out on the trail!

Something's happening here

RB, Minneapolis, MN — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:10:11 GMT

Wonderfully written.

Something's happening here

Dave Fishelson, New York, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:10:16 GMT

BOB DYLAN and BRIAN WILLIAMS: I think Brian Williams showed a lot of guts writing this blog; especially since it points a finger at (among others) his colleagues (whom he must work with ongoingly) at NBC and MSNBC. - My only critique: "Something's happening here" is not "the old song lyric", per se. It's from the chorus of a famous Bob Dylan song from 1965 called "Ballad of a Thin Man." I won't go off on the dozens of tangents that could be spun here (Obama is "thin"; Hillary and Obama accuse each other of being "thin" repeatedly -- in Dylan's sense, I think). But Williams' quoting of this artist is very apt. Dylan, of all seer-like artists of the last century, was always saying "Don't follow leaders, watch your parking meters": i.e. he was a kind of apostle of a New Hampshire-like "making up your own mind", and not accepting "accepted wisdom" from others. So in quoting Dylan, Brian Williams quoted (though without proper credit) the right songwriter.

Something's happening here

Rose, Washington, DC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:10:30 GMT

Brian, Appreciated your article. As a woman in leadership, I too have felt like many have expressed and you admitted. There was too much gloating and dumping on Hillary and many of those subtle and constant digs in ways we women have experienced and are tuned into from men. Much like Barak Obama may feel as a black and the way I hear him sometimes in his comments to blacks. It seemed like Hillary was put in a double bind....she doesn't show emotion or passion and when she does, it gets called manipulative. How many of us have put up with that one?!!!
It also made me very nervous after Iowa when 'ya'll' started calling it all for Obama....it sounded too much like talk about George W....he is so likeable, warm, responsive to people, approachable....and look where our seduction got us! I can live with almost any of the Democrat candidates and am glad it will go longer so we can learn more of the strengths and weaknesses of each.

Something's happening here

Rex, Idaho — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:12:44 GMT

To the media: Not only is it arrogant and idiotic to think that you either know or control how the public thinks, it is also arrogant and idiotic to think you know why the public "defied" you. People do whatever they want to and if you asked a million people you would get a million different answers.

I pity the U.S. if Hillary actually wins.

Something's happening here

william chadwell, Melbourne, Fl — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:13:56 GMT

I is clear to me that MSNBC favors Obama and they do not give Hillary fair coverage. I hope this will change but I doubt it.

Something's happening here

Claire McCarthy — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:14:01 GMT

Thank you Brian Williams for admitting that the professed pundits have gone too far. The people of this United States have been lied to for almost 8 years on just about everything. It's no wonder they don't want to be told what to do or how to vote. The "news" should not be doing that anyway, it is NOT their job. There has been no fair balanced news lately regarding the candidates and someone should fire Chris Matthews. This household stopped watching his show months ago, his sickness with Senator Clinton and her husband is warped. I applaud T. Brokaw (sp)for his professional presentation and comments, reminds me of the good 'ol days with Peter Jennings. Peter is sadly missed at times like this!

Something's happening here

Jane Fonda, Anywhere USA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:14:16 GMT

Hell hath no fury like a woman told whom she must elect! The women are going to take back this country one state at a time!

Something's happening here

James Crisan, Warren, Ohio — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:14:50 GMT

This piece (and countless others about how the media got it wrong in New Hampshire)are all professing embarassment because of Hillary's "comeback". Therein lies the irony! You're still misrepresenting the facts as the underlying premise to your embarassment. THERE WAS NOTHING FOR HILLARY TO "COMEBACK" FROM OTHER THAN A FANTASY CREATED BY THE NEWS MEDIA. Hillary has been ahead in NH since polling began. Obama's win in Iowa was a microcosm of a small sample of American voters, not a "movement".
And now, you people will never give John Edwards the time of day. Last night on NBC, we were treated with a split screen showing either Hillary or Obama's speech and a graphic showing ONLY their vote totals.
It's only January 9 and I'm already disillusioned with the 2008 elections. Way to go.

Something's happening here

Carla, Dallas, Texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:15:11 GMT

As an african-american female; I have a lot to decide in this race. It is Obama or is it Clinton? The NH primaries actually made me a better citizen. I got swepted up in the media also thinkin Clinton was on her last leg; but not really wanting it to be so. I am a supporter of Bill Clinton depsite is moral issues. Today, I get a chance to decide again which is a better candidate for me. I am excited and ready for this political competition! This is the first time I have truly been excited about politics. And I must concede that this enlightenment is due to Barack Obama. There is something happening....and Hillary Clinton is feeling it too. Great article Brian.

Something's happening here

Maureen A. Pineau, Rochester, New York — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:15:16 GMT

Brian Williams' is wonderfully and thoughtfully written.

Hillary should re-think some of her advisors if they told her that she would lose New Hampshire.

I worked as a volunteer in Iowa for Hillary. Many, many, older women with whom I had spoken were not able to get to the caucus [because of age and fear of the icy conditions] and they whole heartedly supported her.

I made telphone calls for Hillary for the New Hampshire primary. I spoke to many people, and I agree with Brian Williams, they came across to me as "good people." Many, many people said they were going to vote for Hillary or had already voted for her. Those who didn't, were thoughtful in their reasons. I never believed she was down and out. I never believed she would lose.

She is the best one for the job. She has the experience of 60 years; the experience of working in or around government for most of her life, and the experience of always having worked for the people. Barack Obama appears to be a good man but he just doesn't have enough life or enough government experience. His speeches are wonderfully oratorical. There isn't any content. A change is coming. We all know it. And, Hillary is that change.

Something's happening here

Barry Yakima WA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:15:28 GMT

I completely agree with Brians comments. Escpecially the part about journalist calling a race before the vote. Keep up the honest, and try to continue and spread it. We need objectivity and patience in the media, not bandwagon crystal ball flawed poll results.

Something's happening here

Tony, Bend, Oregon — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:15:33 GMT

I wrote a blog called PinocchiObama concerning Oprah Winfrey's star-studded backing of the young senator. The common thread in voter sentiment is that no one, especially Americans, will tolerate being pushed, or even heavily persuaded to vote any certain way, even if the endorser is Queen of the Universe. We are people of intentional conviction, and we will NOT vote according to another's conscience.

Something's happening here

Moe Denver, Colo — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:15:58 GMT

“She was tired, and she was emotional. She did what any of us would have, and have done at times: She briefly lost control of her emotions.” Is this the best excuse NBC can say about a person (Hillary cries her way to the HILL- what a joke) running the biggest office in our Country! We don’t need another weak LEADER! We need a Leader who can handle the pressures that will come with the JOB!

Something's happening here

Nicholas, Lloyda Guyana, South America — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:16:31 GMT

Wow! A journalist who is willing to admit when he and his peers got it wrong and is able to retrospectively and eloquently describe the events leading up to the NH vote. I live all the way in Guyana, South America and watch American Politics like it is a sport. But for the most part the American media annoys me because they editorialise everything. Their opinions are presented as fact.and it is sickening. From Fox New's publishing of the most unflattering pictures of the democrats as they can find to the declaration of results before most of the votes have been counted is just pathetic.

However, I would like to make a prediction of my own and since I am not American I don't have to be politically correct. If the democrats nominate either Obama or Clinton the Republicans will win again. But because of Clinton's experience she will put up a better fight. Both Huckabe and Mcain are probably salivating at the chance to run against the two history makers.

But good job Brian Williams. You are heads above the rest.

Something's happening here

Joan, HIlton Head, SC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:16:38 GMT

This is the most honest thing I have read recently by a newscaster or writer. I'm thoroughly fed up with the reporting lately. The only thing worse than the hatchet job you were trying to do on Hillary is the one the whole industry is doing on that pethetic young woman, Britany Spears, who exhibits every symptom of coming unravelled either from post-partem syndrom or a complete breakdown.

Thank you Brian for admitting the know-it-all's don't really know it all. The vindictive reporting will backfire on all of you every time eventually. Maybe the media has not got the message yet. The mainstream is tired of the kind of reporting you are doing. Who, what, when and where. keep personalities out of it.

Something's happening here

Lou Meraz, Los Angeles, CA — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:16:45 GMT

Hillary won. The polls and press and pundits were misleading as usual. 'comeback and upset' refer to people that were behind, Hillary was never behind. Shame on those who predicted the wrong outcome. Don't you smell Rove directing the right wingers who own the media?

Something's happening here

Shane O'Neil, Chicago, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:17:53 GMT

Thank Brian for a well written piece. As someone who was born and raised in New Hampshire, I can see how the residents were left to feel that political experts had all but made up the minds of New Hampshire voters. As you said, New Hampshire voters take their duties very seriously and they want the facts not fluff. They resent being told what to do. They also want to hear that a candidate has contemplated their views and actions that they will fulfill on their first day in office. They are less interested in whipping people into a maddening frenzy at a rally with vague rhetoric. I think the lesson here is the independent-minded thinkers of New Hampshire spoke loud and clear when their actions said "NOT-SO-FAST" and let their voices be heard by surprising the pollsters by trading "Let's Make History" for "Change+Experience".

Something's happening here

Richard Dalstrom Belford,N.J. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:18:18 GMT

Brian,

I thought you were from Middletown,N.J. You went to the same schools as my children.
Second point, there was massive voter fraud in New Hampshire. People from outside the state, neighboring states like Mass. and Vermont are allowed to vote in N.H. if they declare they are moving there. Busloads of people and hundreds of cars with Mass. plates have been reported in N.H. How about telling the real story for once !!! Native of N.H. my butt, your a Jersey boy !!!

Something's happening here

Marc Jasmin — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:18:20 GMT

Exceptional article written by someone who lives the New England mentality. It was easy to get caught up in Obama euphoria when you rode through cheering crowds in Lebanon. You said it reminded you of the song: "Something's happening here." What you forgot was the second line..."what it is ain't exactly clear". Although every media person wants to break the story, perhaps in the next venue, the media should hold off declaring a "winner" until it is clear. After too many campaigns that were "over" after the first few states, it's great that this is shaping up to be one of the most competitive campaigns ever...on both sides of the aisle. Neither the media, nor the candidates can take anything for granted.

Something's happening here

Marlene C, Chicago, IL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:18:25 GMT

I know women were very angry at Obama's cockey attitude but most of all by some of his comments, such as referring to HRC's visits with foreign leaders as "Having Teas." It was derogatory and offensive to women period, not just Hillary. Older women have been around enough to have seen men with far fewer qualifications than their female counterparts get that big job, big title, big promotion over women with twice their qualifications. It happens in small towns, big cities, corporations, and all types of organizations. Younger women haven't often hit the glass ceiling yet, so they see the "polished" but unaccomplished junior Senator from Illinois as some sort of charasmatic leader they should follow. In truth as an Illinois State Senator, Obama answered "Present" rather than yay or nay in over a 100 votes-- seen in this state as avoiding controversial issues. Rather than take a stand for something, he stood for nothing. And that is what voters need to understand. If that is the kind of President they want, then young people won't be disappointed. Me, I want someone who walks the walk, not just talks the talk. I'm from Illinois, and while I voted for him for the U.S. Senate, I had to consider the far right wing "values" of his opponent. Still, I expected better from Obama as a Senator He has yet to deliver. Given that, he will not be getting a promotion from me.

Something's happening here

Richard Dalstrom Belford,N.J. — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:19:00 GMT

You don't have the guts to post my comment.

Something's happening here

Clare Gates, Weston, FL — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:19:53 GMT

Tom Brokaw was wonderful last night, when he admonished Chris Matthews for his part in predicting the fall of Hillary. You were so certain that she would lose, you would not call it. Obama had to concede before some of the news stations would call it. Please do not take away our right to choose. Remember what you all have done. Thank you Brian for admitting it.

Something's happening here

Ward Hillyer Bastrop, Tx — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:20:11 GMT

I think that the most instructive thing here; and at first, it might sound petty, is the use of the word, defy, to describe what happened. I think most politicians and media are way out of touch with the average american and when confronted with that fact are patronizing.

Something's happening here

Mark Adams, Coon Rapids, mn — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:21:15 GMT

I know this may not get posted. But here goes!!!
This is the clinton thing. All of or almost all of NH fell for it. Do you all really want 4-8 years of bill again? Remember a few years were working on the marrage. This man used the greatest place on earth to hurt his wife. Funny she never cried about that.

Something's happening here

Marilyn Boisseau, Hartford, CT — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:21:25 GMT

Using my own instincts and reactions to events as a guide, I believe that a contributing factor to the swing back to Hillary by New Hampshire voters was how women perceived her to be treated by the Media and by her opponents.

Media "personality" Chris Mathews was disrespectful and over the top for months - day in and day out. Even last evening he cried out to his guest talking heads: "Can he throw momma from the train?" - referring to Obama - at least four times! It spoke volumes to me ...
Her competitors ganged up on her; and were condescending

Witnessing this, I suspect many women began to relate to the obstacles they face and implied and overt indignities they suffer daily: within their marriages; in the workplace; in the world. Fortunately today, women have a sufficient sense of self - and the opportunity presented by this legitimate candidate - to take action. So they rallied around Clinton.

As someone who may very well not vote for Clinton when my turn comes to participate, I offer this as a window into the sexual dynamics of this contest.

Something's happening here

Randy Lamb, New York, NY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:21:33 GMT

In spite of Brian Williams' incessant carping on Katrina, from which he recently seems to have taken a hiatus, thankfully, I have always enjoyed his reporting. This article puts him over the top with me. Eloquently worded, candid and spot on. Bravo, Brian. That's why we watch your news program. Thank you for you honesty and your continued efforts to "get it right".

Something's happening here

M. May, Berea, KY — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:22:57 GMT

Mr. Wiliams, while I watch you most evenings, I have never had the privledge of reading something that you have written.

Your portrayal of the voters of New Hampshire was beautiful and reminded me why I am so proud to tell everyone I'm from New England, North of "Bahston", South of New Hampshire and just a bit West of the Atlantic Ocean.

Thank you.

Something's happening here

ken — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:23:06 GMT

Obama may be a breath of fresh air and a terrific man and politician, but as of this moment he has been a creation of the media. The right virulently hates all things Clinton. The media lives for stories. A woman respected by Democrats for so many reasons and despised by the right...well, her fall makes a great headline. Obama, who might be something special, is an unknown commodity at this point. I will be more than content with either of them as a nominee. The first woman president or the first black president is a mantle I would clearly enjoy, particularly when they would replace the current occupant of the White House!

Something's happening here

Linda Newman, Lexington, SC — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:23:19 GMT

Dear Brian, You are a breath of fresh air!! I watched the clip of Senator Clinton....she looked genuine to me...and I am really tired of hearing the smears about her. I am not for her, as our President, but...should she be elected, I will certainly support her with my prayers, just as I do our current President. What I see is such disrespect from the media. Would it break people's jaw to say, President Bush? No wonder the young people have little interest in true politics. Debates and what the issues are...are key factors in these elections. Glad you had a good lesson here. Hope it lasts.
Sincerely, Linda

Something's happening here

B Johnson, Beaumont, Texas — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:24:43 GMT

You have to look at the substance, not your personal biases. America some of you say the craziest things and you really expect the rest of us to believe them. Men CRY too. To say Hillary was being cynical just pisses me off. To Human is to be exhausted, tired and to be talked about like some of you have ..., yes she hurts too. What will you say when Obama breaks down and gets emotional when someone starts attacking him, his wife, even his kids? Because he will. This is his first time in a situation like this. What will you say then? Listen to the speeches. Hillary can answer any question on any subject, and has a plan for the future that she speaks about. I haven't heard Barack say anything but "it's time for a change." I've heard him attack Hillary when someone points that out, or when it is pointed out how he goes back and forth on what he says. You know I could go on and on, all I ask is that you listen. Step aside from whatever is going on when you hear either of them speak and listen to the answers when questions are asked about policy, and plans then make up your mind.