<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>For the world's oceans - a disturbing early warning</title><link>http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1904795.aspx</link><description>By Ian Williams, NBC News correspondent
Will Howard used to think the biggest threat to the World's oceans came from the things you could see - like the detritus clogging so many our estuaries and coastal regions. Now he's found new evidence of how invisible</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>For the world's oceans - a disturbing early warning</title><link>http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1904795.aspx#1912678</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:45:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1912678</guid><dc:creator>DAVID BENGTSON,ST. AUGUSTINE,FLORIDA</dc:creator><description>YOU MENTIONED THAT PEOPLE END UP WITH PNEUMONIA WITH THE SWINE FLU AND THAT THE FLU SHOTS WE HAVE RECEIVED DON'T HELP US. WILL THE PNEUMONIA SHOTS WE GET HELP US ANY.</description></item><item><title>For the world's oceans - a disturbing early warning</title><link>http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1904795.aspx#1972099</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1972099</guid><dc:creator>Mark Sears</dc:creator><description>If the earth creates 97% of the carbon dioxide going into the atomosphere and the ocean absorbs half of that, what can be done to stop it? Or are the scientists saying the ocean absorbs half of the 3% man releases?</description></item><item><title>For the world's oceans - a disturbing early warning</title><link>http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1904795.aspx#1972374</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:08:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1972374</guid><dc:creator>Karl, South Lake Tahoe, California</dc:creator><description>If the oceans go, we go.</description></item><item><title>For the world's oceans - a disturbing early warning</title><link>http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1904795.aspx#1995630</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:01:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1995630</guid><dc:creator>simon david simkis. at the moment in Donetsk,Ukraine.</dc:creator><description>We are close to catastrofic events globally!. Mankind in it's magnificence has brought this upon itself,but if it is manmade it can also be repaired by mankind!.&lt;br&gt;Keep fighting the battle Mr Howard!, and the very best of luck to you and yours!.x</description></item><item><title>For the world's oceans - a disturbing early warning</title><link>http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1904795.aspx#1999585</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:32:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1999585</guid><dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator><description>I'm not sure where you got the idea that mankind only creates 3% of the carbon emissions, Mark, but your data is magnificently faulty. &amp;nbsp;Mankind creates by far the largest amount of carbon ever seen on earth since before life began. &amp;nbsp;Your statement smacks of Bushism, and the propaganda being put out by the Bushies during the last eight years. &amp;nbsp;HUMANS are causing this problem, NOT nature.</description></item><item><title>For the world's oceans - a disturbing early warning</title><link>http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1904795.aspx#2043213</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:11:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:2043213</guid><dc:creator>Larry Weissman</dc:creator><description>Well I'm not sure here.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;In January, an unmanned submarine, the Jason, was able to collect the first coral samples from highly acidic water up to ten thousands of feet beneath the ocean.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this dead coral that has fallen to the depths? Coral cannot exist without light.There is no light at these depths. What am I missing?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larry &lt;br&gt;BS Marine Biology Cal State Long Beach</description></item></channel></rss>