ABOUT THIS BLOG

The Daily Nightly began on May 31, 2005. As Brian wrote in his first post it aims to provide a narrative of the broadcast day and a window into the editorial process at NBC Nightly News. Brian weighs in every weekday and NBC News correspondents and producers post regularly.

Brian Williams became the seventh anchor and managing editor in the history of NBC Nightly News on December 2, 2004. Read his full biography.



Smoking and genetics

Posted: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:21 PM by Sam Singal

By Robert Bazell, NBC News chief science correspondent

 

My mother and her identical twin smoked enormous numbers of cigarettes from their teenage years until their deaths – my mother at age 90 and my aunt at 91.  Neither developed lung cancer.   But lest anyone think this is a recommendation for smoking,  they  both endured years of misery from emphysema and my mother (and probably my aunt) died from kidney cancer which is linked to smoking.

 

The point here is something that has long been known.  While 80 to 90 percent of people who develop lung cancer are smokers or former smokers, only 15 percent of people who smoke significant amounts get the disease.  The assumption has always been that genetics provided the explanation –and the case of the twins so important to my life provide a tiny piece of evidence.

But now the knowledge from the human genome project is starting to provide specific information that fills in the blanks.  Three large groups of researchers found an area of genetic variability on chromosome 15 that increases the risk of lung cancer in smokers.  While the three groups worked independently they came to remarkably similar conclusions.  You can read the original research here  AND here AND here.

The gene alterations described by these scientists are responsible for proteins in the lungs that act as receptors or binding sites for nicotine.  That means they probably enhance the effects of nicotine on those with this genetic  makeup—making it harder to stop smoking.  They also seem to facilitate the passage of poisonous substances from nicotine into the lungs, accelerating the chain of events in the lung cells that leads to cancer.

Like most exciting, but basic research this has no immediate application.  But it there is a good chance that this could lead to a blood test to determine who which smokers or former smokers are most at risk for lung cancer.  Those would the ones who should  get a screening test such as a spiral CT scan to find early stage lung cancer.  (GE, parent company of NBC, makes many of the machines used for spiral CT scans).

The new genetic knowledge could also lead to better drugs to block the effects of nicotine and better help smokers to quit. 

It is important to note that two of the three research groups looked at non-smokers who had the genetic variation.  Those people were not at risk for lung cancer.  It is the tobacco with its  nicotine which is villain here – not anyone’s genetics.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Re: the real villan here is nicotine..

misleading comment.  Nicotine is bad for the body but it is not a bad villian.  Tabacoo companies are not being forced to sell nicotine to people.  they chose to.  They have no morals and put it out there, they are as bad as drug thugs.  So don't try to skip over that!!!!

REAL VILLIAN HERE IS THE COMPANIES!
Tobacco is a consumer product that is legally sold over the counter to approximately 21% of the U.S. population.  Even the current high price of cigarettes doesn't seem to have much impact on the gross number of smokers, so what can the Federal Government do, short of banning the sale of tobacco?  You know that few government entities really want that to happen, since the retail price for tobacco products includes a significant percentage of federal, state, and local taxes.
To all smokers.  Cancer and problems with smoking don't mean the lungs are the only thing smoking effects.  4 years ago I was told I had cancer and tumors in my bladder. I was told it was from smoking. I had stopped smoking over 25 years back.  Just make sure the next one you light up is worth the trouble you can be facing down the line.  The urologist (through treatment) has my cancer in check for the last 2 years. Treatments are no fun but was effective.
"... 4 years ago I was told I had cancer and tumors in my bladder. I was told it was from smoking."

Just to be fair, there's no way for the doctor to know that; it's an easy thing to say that doesn't require much thought or analysis.  :)
I can't quit smoking now. There are too many people with more than I have depending on the tax money to pay for their government supplied health insurance. The democrats are always telling me how I don't care about people in need. How can I stop now and prove them right?
It will be highly pragmatic if the manufacture and sale of tobacco products with the exception of nicotine patches were made illegal.
Medicines that improve people's lives but have adverse effects in some are pulled of the shelves. Why not pull of a drug that is a diseases in the first place?
Not only does tobacco smoke have an adverse effect on the user, it harms people nearby too.
Strict laws are placed on where individuals can or cannot smoke and yet cigarette companies enjoy profits? Who can monitor parent's smoke affecting their infants?
Why doesn't such irrationality spark debate?
Carbon dioxide getting into the air-cond chamber through the air-vents daily when tailing heavy vehicles or passenger cars in busy streets. Pass through a rubber factory, u get a heavy stench inside the car chamber. Isn't that smoking the dangerous air-cond gas, CO2,carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphide daily affect lung performance plus atmospheric polluction, haze, factories's atmospheric discharges. What are u or the govt going to do about it to reduce or minimize such inherent risks.I am of the opinion that lowering the tar content of cigarettes is very bad for health cos u tend to smoke more,more heat to cause cancer, and u are actually smoking more paper than getting adequate supply of nicotine daily.Please put all these suggestions proposed for clinical testing to verify my statements. Do not conveniently give me a reply without testing.So, u see, everyone can get lung cancer due to all the daily contaminants. No surprise millions would die of lung cancer or other cancers due to chemical foods easily available in the marketplace. Thanks for listening and not hearing. God bless
As a doctor I see the ill effects of smoking daily in my patients as well as my nursing staff.  Either raise the price on tabacco to price them off of the market or have smokers sign a contract that they will not seek treatment for smoking related illnesses such as those described on the side of the package.  I am afraid that this genetic study is going to lead to a costly test to see if it is "ok" to smoke.  It is never OK to smoke.  Time to grow up and kick the habit.  Everyone quits eventually, no time like now.
smokinmg cigarettes is one of the major factors that gave me my stroke.  Nicotine shrinks blood vessels.Hell cigarette companies don't care some young kid took my place.
I too have bladder cancer from smoking starting at age 12.  My bladder was removed at age 40.  Smoking... not good for you.  
There is a higher chance of getting lung cancer if u produce low tar cigarettes. U tend to light up more. To lower tar content, u make it grow through a chemical process.All chemicals of hydrocarbon base kills life, surely but gradually.Only through the process of time will tell. Time is the ssence.It is the heat that causes cancer like kentucky fries chicken or other forms of fried chickens or fried stuff, barbeque stuff, plus msg. All cannot be blamed to nicotine alone, it is complementary to all sorts of foods consumed daily. U can escape one but not the other.When u produce high tar cigarettes people smoke less since they have the required dosage daily with less smoking. Low tar cigrettes increase the risks due to frequency of smoking and the heat that kills the celia cells. Thanks for listening. Rememeber, passive smoking is not from smokers alone but also atmospheric pollution such as air-cond gas, co2, co, so2, hydrogen sulphide, haze, foggy city smoke as in London and China, where heavy industries or major cities with traffic jams, etc. Millions die each year from lung ailments.

What is the world govt going to do about it?? Also the chemcial foods consumed daily. How can we avoid death? No way, just trust God and pray fervently each day. To reduce risks, I would recommend water therapy, drinks lots of it to wash down the daily contaminants that are ever prevailing everywhere plus the chemcial exposures.Trust God and trust yourself to do the right thing and lead your life prayerfully.
Life expectancy has to do with your food intake and genetics. Would fully agree with u. Some family members live to a ripe old age whilst some have short lives. Nothing to blame on this and that since we have been following all reearchers' quidelines closely and from time to time. Death and income tax cannot be avoided in one's life. Take life naturally as it comes. Trust the LOrd to have a heavenly place.

Some are not so lucky, born with congenital defects..u said it ' genetics'

All the chemical foods and all forms of atmospheric  daily pollutions can kill. Even when CO enters the car chambers by accident can kill instantly.

Quote u an incident, a cobbler left his wife and 3 children in a bran new car and went about the city shopping. He returned in 45 mins time and found the whole family dead due to a gas leak inside the air-cond chamber.

All diseases lead to heart,lungs,renal or kidney. Thease are liken anologously to cauburetor, air-filters and radiator of the car. So one leads to another for complementary functions. If u can arrest one, u can escape the other. All organs are linked and complementary in functions.

This is God's creation of the bodily make-up.   Cannot really blame on cigarettes alone.

I would describe myself as being as anti-tobacco as a person can be.  I cannot fathom the thought process that motivates you to begin smoking in the first place.  The popular excuse is that you became hooked as a child before you had sound judgement.  Sorry, I was a teenager and was fully aware this was something to strongly avoid and this is drilled into every child in health education since the 1960's.  Unless you were forced in a prison camp to ingest nicotine, your problems as a smoker are a serious deficiency in sound judgement.  Whatever problems that are caused by your smoking are attributable to you, you and you.  

For this reason, I will not support Obama for president.  He is a smoker.  A smoker is as an alcoholic, once you are addicted, you will always crave nicotine.  His judgement is poor and this will be reflected in poor decisions as commander-in-chief.  When the pressure mounts in the White House, he'll want to sneak out on the porch to sneak a smoke.  Otherwise he violates federal law for smoking in US government buildings.  

I recently saw McCain smoking in a video but it looked like this was a condition of torture forced on him by his North Vietnamese captors.
This is important information.

I would however like to see more information about radioactive molecules present in tobacco leaves due to artificial fertilizers.  Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop has posited that perhaps the majority of Tobacco caused Cancers is due to this one factor.

It seems a compelling theory.  Records seem to indicate that cancers due to smoking multiplied when modern agricultural techniques were introduced after World War II.  Artificial Fertilizers are produced from mined minerals.  These contain trace radioactive molecules, which break down into other radioactive atoms.  Uranium, Radium, Lead, Polonium.  These seem to get deposited on leaves in the form of dust.

This is true of all agricultural products,  But is not as dangerous when eaten compared to smoked.

I would like to see some animal studies of Cancer incidence where traditionally cultivated tobacco is compared with Organically grown tobacco on land that hasn't been exposed to artificial fertilizers.

Although I personally am not a fanatic about Organic foods.  In this area it seems it might have an important role.


Also important is the decision this week to give the FDA more regulatory power over tobacco.  Maybe it will finally be required to list the ingredients in tobacco products just like every other consumable product.  Something that is long overdue.
There are some shockingly ignorant statements in this discussion. But two posts bother me most.

Will the doctor here next decide not to treat a morbidly obese person (genes?), or the lifetime alcoholic (genes?), or the risk-taker injured doing a wheelie with his motorcycle. Doctor, your job is to treat, not judge, those you minister. I hope I never need services from a medical "professional" like yourself.

And with all of the massive problems the U.S. and world face, to eliminate a brilliant Presidential candidate because he once smoked is just ... warped thinking. I regret to say my vote will obviously cancel yours.
This is still on excuse to start smoking...even if you're resistant to lung cancer there's a boat load of other deseases that can kill you!!
Dear Robert Bazell,

This blog entry just answered the question I was left asking after the broadcast about if emphysema was minimized.  Thank you for caring about people who didn't get taught not smoking in school.  

If you go to Amazon.com you can purchase nostalgia candy cigarettes.  If you get those then the cigarettes don't eat you.  Same with Atomic Fireballs.  
Nicotine may be the cause of desease but it certainly is not the cause of addiction.  Proved by the enormouse amount of nicotine patches, gum etc available to us and we still light up. I am convinced the addiction is more in the tars and the taste in the mouth, when the taste disappears another cigarette is called for.  I would rather see the millions of dollars spent on advertising ridiculing and humiliating the smoker spent on research for a definate solution to smoking. I wonder how they could ever replace the billions of dollars of tax revenue that cigarette produce.  I do not socialize with non-smokers, symphathise or even hire them simply because I was a non-smoker back when doctor offices and every other business had ash trays and matches available.  The smoke did not bother me and I never went complaining to anyone or put it on the ballot. I am over 70 and do not have cancer and everyone I have known (many) who died or was stricken with cancer were non-smokers. I am hard to convince there were more cases of smoking related cancer in 1956 than non-smokers today.    
Robert, I am continually amazed by the amount of great work you provide. Lsat night I was thinking, "Does this guy ever take a night off?" It seems like you have a different story every day about a completely different topic. i can't imagine the amount of legwork you and your team put in on a daily basis. Nice job.
Hi It has been My experiance that smoking brings down stress levels.Everone has some sort of a coping mecanisum.Could I then ask the question;If I quit this habbit which can have serius conciquences for my phisical body, how do I coop with the stress levels that are a mentally exhausting and way less tollerable
for the people around me? I came to the concusion that
My bad habbit ended up being less of an impact on my inviroment including my own mental wellbeing than trying to quite somking time and time again and start working on creating a live style that brings my stress levels down that will give me acces to being smoke free.
Thank you for listening
You all seem to be in the dark concerning types of smokers. There are tobacco smokers and users that do not inhale smoke into their lungs. Then there are those cigarette smokers, most of which do inhale smoke into their lungs inviting lung cancer. Almost all pipe and cigar smokers don’t inhale smoke into their lungs, since there are no taste buds in the lungs, and smoking a pipe or cigars is not about getting a nicotine fix, it’s about taste. Smoking a pipe or cigars is as harmless as drinking a cup of tea. Then of course there are the tobacco chewers and sniffers; since direct and prolonged contact with a tobacco product is required, this activity can cause cancer. If anyone is going to get even with the system, deservedly so, it should be pipe and cigar smokers, since they practice safe smoking and do not get cancer.
eeeew,  genetic defectives!  Mutants! I gots an idea, hows about gettin' the FDA to force chemical treatment of tabaccy to lower nicotine content.  That's a wise, the established consumer base will inhale more smoke so as to gets their nicotine fix.  Lets a put it to a vote.
The earliest direct condemnation of tobacco in Christian history occurred among the Anabaptists of the 1500s.  That's right, there's no direct condemnation of tobacco before 1500!  This would mean that the body is a temple teaching in 1 Corinthians couldn't have had tobacco in mind when it was written.  It seems that the early Christians had no objections to using tobacco.  Surprising but, true!  Just passing this along.  Let me finish by pointing out that people know addictions are difficult, more so with genetically-based addictions, but they're still trying to kick them out and pressure them to quit.  Raising the costs of cigarettes, given the fact that most smokers are poor and won't quit smoking, makes a bad situation worse.  It's time for people to be more understanding and empathetic towards addictions.
I cannot believe that any rational or sane individual would dare say smokers show less good judgement than smokers. I beg to differ. Almost all our founding fathers smoked. Almost every president in our history has or was a smoker at one time. So maybe u should start smoking and kill some of those dumb brain cells.
Right On, Isaiah!  and I am an ex-smoker.  a Heavy ex-smoker  Smoked for 40 years... quit 15 months ago...

Brain Cells are still intact.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

RECENT STORIES FROM NIGHTLY NEWS

  • Nightly News section front

CONNECT WITH US

About the broadcast | Biographies

RSS is an easy way to get the news you want as it is updated even if you are not on MSNBC.com. More information about MSNBC.com's RSS feeds.

Subscribe to feed

Podcasting brings you audio and video from each weekday broadcast on your iPod or other portable MP3 player anytime, anywhere. More information about MSNBC.com's podcasts.

Subscribe to podcast

Sign-up for our daily e-mail newsletter. It offers a preview of the stories and special reports featured on each weekday broadcast.


Syndicate This Site

Add The Daily Nightly to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google