ABOUT THIS BLOG

The Daily Nightly began on May 31, 2005. As Brian wrote in his first post it aims to provide a narrative of the broadcast day and a window into the editorial process at NBC Nightly News. Brian weighs in every weekday and NBC News correspondents and producers post regularly.

Brian Williams became the seventh anchor and managing editor in the history of NBC Nightly News on December 2, 2004. Read his full biography.



Genetic tests: Approach with caution

Posted: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:24 AM by Elizabeth Chuck

By Robert Bazell, NBC News chief science correspondent

One of the most important lessons I’ve learned in many years of reporting on health and science is that the advice to talk to your doctor – routinely offered up by government officials and others when a complex issue arrives – can be close to useless.

No doubt physicians know a lot.  But they can’t know everything – and especially in fields that have developed rapidly after they completed their training.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the issue we are covering tonight in the second part of our series, “Who We Are: The Truth about DNA.”  Genetic tests for hundreds of diseases are now hitting the market place and many of the companies have been advertising them directly to the public and heavily to physicians.

The problem is, correctly interpreting the results can be complex and difficult.  Many physicians simply don’t know how to, and the consequences can be dire.  Women who test positive for a breast cancer gene, for example, often elect to have their breasts and ovaries surgically removed.  But a negative test can give a false sense of security that might lead a woman to forgo routine mammograms that could have detected early breast cancer and saved her life.  Moreover, the breast cancer gene test, which costs more than $3000, is often simply not necessary.

The  biggest seller and advertiser of the tests is Myriad Genetics.  Its CEO, Dr. Gregory Kritchfield, tells me the company advertises because “We feel a tremendous obligation from a public health perspective to get the information in the hands of individuals so that they can have the appropriate medical interventions take place."

But Ellen Matloff, a genetic counselor at Yale, says “If you watch these ads on TV, you would think that you're a candidate for this test, even if your neighbors had breast cancer and you're just concerned about getting it. And that's a misnomer. It's not accurate.”

Lax government regulation
At least there is no argument about the accuracy of the tests from Myriad Genetics.  Dozens of other companies are selling tests which many scientists say can be inaccurate and lack value for predicating much about genetic diseases. There is a frightening lack of government regulation.

Even with a good test, there are potential pitfalls.  The results, as Matloff points out, is “not a yes or no answer like a pregnancy test,” but rather a series of subtleties.

One of the biggest challenges is that if you take a genetic test, it can affect your parents, children, brothers and sisters even cousins.  Do they know you are taking the test? Do they want you to share the information with them and will they know what it means? Do you want to share it?

Because of all of these and many other complexities, experts in genetic medicine advise that everyone gets competent counseling BEFORE they decide to take a test. 

You can certainly get counseling from some doctors.  But look that doctor in the eye and ask if he or she is truly understands the issues and is comfortable with the counseling.

Another option is to find a certified genetic counselor. These are people who are trained to understand the results and are likely the best qualified . You can find one from their certifying organization, the National Society of Genetic Counselors (http://www.nsgc.org/)

Genetic testing for diseases is an area where the science is far ahead of society’s ability to handle it.

 

Editor's note: Robert Bazell's report on the growing number of genetic tests airs tonight on the broadcast. Tomorrow night, he takes an in-depth look at how DNA evidence is shaking up the world of forensic science. Read a preview here.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

As someone living with severe lung disease - hereditary COPD (Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency) - I am acutely aware of value of knowing or not knowing what's in my genes.  

One risk you failed to mention was the potential for discrimination in the workplace and insurance due to the fact that you simply got tested for something that may, someday, cause a disease process somewhere down the road. Emphasis on the word 'may'.

There is currently legislation at the national level that would protect people from genetic discrimination. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act [H.R. 493, S.358] has been approved by House and is on hold in the Senate because of the actions of Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)who claims the bill would place too much strain on businesses. The non-profit organization, The Genetic Alliance (http://www.geneticalliance.org), is working on behalf of those with genetic conditions and trying to help move this stalled legislation on to becoming law.

We will never be able to truly access our genetic legacies or futures until laws are in place to protect those against whom that information could be used.  
Our health insurance company, which insured our child since 1991, excluded paying more than $25,000 of a large health bill because they would not cover a congenital abnormality if "not born under the policy."  This congenital abnormality was discovered at 18 y.o.

Do you really want to find out if you have a congenital problem i.e. cancer, heart disease, etc. and open the doors for insurance companies to deny coverage or refuse to pay for your health care as we have experienced.    
I have  a genetic lung disease and i regret having my son tested for this disease.  Before congress is the GINA bill in which the doctor senator from Oklahoma Mr. Colburn has a hold on.  By having my son tested he had to give false information on job applications, and joining the national guard to serve our country in Iraq.  With this bill people with genetic disease will not be discriminated against will be able to get health insurance, and not have to marry someone you dont really love to get insurance. Do a segemnt on Senator Colburn who has 81 bills on hold.  Show the world what kind of senators we have serving our nation.
If the medical establishment cannot keep this private, critical information private and the legal system does not end insurance company business that discriminates against a (pre existing) genetic diagnosis our public health investment should completely nationalize the enterprise, now.
We did not pay tax money for the human genome project only to give drug companies lucrative target information.
Senator Coburn ought be excoriated if above writer is true. Any woman with a strong enough family history ought be BRAC tested...and myraid should set a national goal of when they will be able to pronounce that such is the case....our tax money has enabled them....
This is my third attempt to write about my experience with Ellen Matloff at the Yale Genetics Cancer Center and I have erased it because posting this on the world wide web frankly scares me. It has been several years since I was counseled but the fear of insurance companies finding out is scary even after all this time.  And although the outcome was good, it's not something that one wants to share with alot of people.  Shame on the insurance companies for discriminating against people who need to know this vital information that could save their lives and their families' lives.  This too is preventative health care.  Let's hope that the legislation is passed, and passed soon.
First off.  Health Insurance companies cannot discriminate against you based on your genetic information.  It's against the law.  HIPAA, state laws, and even the congress is in the process of passing a law that prohibits insurance discrimination.  Second, most physicians (myself included), know how to counsel patients as it takes 5-10 minutes and is very straight forward.  Let's be real here people.  Knowing your genetic information can possibly save your life.  You can possibly prevent cancer by knowing this information.  I just took out the ovaries from a patient who is BRCA positive and I found an occult cancer.  We never find cancer this early unless by accident.  I saved this woman's life because she got tested.  Negative results on the BRACanalysis means you are at general population risk for Ovarian cancer and your risk for Breast cancer should be based on your family's history, but is nowhere near the 87% chance of breast cancer if you are BRCA positive.  It's not hard, people, and if you really want to know the story, ask your doctor.  Don't believe a one-sided Public relations story bought and paid for my Yale University.
Tuesday, February 12th 2008, you had a program on DNA
Tests, which spoke of a test available for $120.00 from, I believe Sorensen Medical Salt Lake City, UT.
This test could determine an individuals geneology links.  Could you please give me more information about contacting the responsible Lab to secure such a test.  Thank you
It does not seem very professional of Ellen Matloff to make blanket generalizations about the competency of liscensed Medical Doctors.  Her voice is often heard when genetics makes a commercial splash---and that voice is usually reactionary.  Can we please have a more balanced overview on the progression of genetic testing in the commercial medical arena?  Countless lives have been saved yet we seem to be concentrating on outlier situations.  Is this a fair assessment?

Dear Doctor Dan,
Have you ever heard of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency related lung or liver disease? Have you ever taken blood to test for the alpha level in someone who had elevated liver enzymes or early onset COPD? Did you warn them that that test could or would reflect the possibility of a genetic condition that could lead to a disease process or processes? Basing decisions to get tested for potential diseases assuming protections at the federal level that are
'almost' in place is like having unprotected sex with a known HIV positive individual knowing that a cure is 'just around the corner'.  You may not get infected and even if you do, there is a cure.
While you may be very careful and very thorough in your own practice, I can assure you that for the vast majority of those of us living and dying in the genetic disease community - there are very real reasons to wait until we are fully protected before we go unzipping our genetic fly without protection at the national level.  
It seems (at $3,000 per whack)that genetic testing is mainly the gypsy forcaster of the rich.

I at least agree with all of them paying plenty in their attempt to not die..live well..etc.

It is the medical realities of the masses that will determine the rise or fall of every civilization (so far)

Can we masses therefor get this free? They're working on that for us right now..right?....DG


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

RECENT STORIES FROM NIGHTLY NEWS

  • Nightly News section front

CONNECT WITH US

About the broadcast | Biographies

RSS is an easy way to get the news you want as it is updated even if you are not on MSNBC.com. More information about MSNBC.com's RSS feeds.

Subscribe to feed

Podcasting brings you audio and video from each weekday broadcast on your iPod or other portable MP3 player anytime, anywhere. More information about MSNBC.com's podcasts.

Subscribe to podcast

Sign-up for our daily e-mail newsletter. It offers a preview of the stories and special reports featured on each weekday broadcast.


Syndicate This Site

Add The Daily Nightly to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google