ABOUT THIS BLOG

The Daily Nightly began on May 31, 2005. As Brian wrote in his first post it aims to provide a narrative of the broadcast day and a window into the editorial process at NBC Nightly News. Brian weighs in every weekday and NBC News correspondents and producers post regularly.

Brian Williams became the seventh anchor and managing editor in the history of NBC Nightly News on December 2, 2004. Read his full biography.



Traffic Troubles

Posted: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 3:40 PM by Sam Singal

By Charles Hadlock, NBC News Producer

If you have to navigate the urban jungle of crowded freeways, Houston may be the place to do it while still keeping your sanity. Houston, with a population approaching six million people in the metro area, is notorious for traffic jams. In the early 1980's, the city had the nation's second-worst traffic congestion. But a surge of road building --along with new technology -- helped get the traffic flowing again.   Houston is now ranked seventh in the latest Urban Mobility Report.  Not perfect, but better than it used to be.

There are several things Houston is doing that other congested cities can only dream about.

At any given time, you can log onto http://traffic.houstontranstar.org/layers/ and instantly see traffic conditions in Houston on a colorful map. Hopefully, you'll see lots of green, which means traffic is moving at posted speeds. Click on a freeway segment and you can learn the actual speed traffic is moving. Click on the camera icons and see images from hundreds of cameras mounted along the freeways.

According to the Urban Mobility Report, Houston is seeing a lot more yellows and reds during rush hour.  But at least now you can verify what your commute will be like before you leave home or the office and make decisions about alternate routes or simply stay in place and wait it out. 

If you're already on the road, giant electronic message boards keep drivers posted on traffic conditions and travel times ahead. Newer GPS devices tap into this data and alert drivers on their dashboards. The information is also available on cell phones and PDA's.  Radio and TV stations broadcast traffic reports, of course, but nothing is as fast and accurate as seeing traffic information in real time.
 
 In 1994, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)  began building a network of electronic sensors along busy freeways. Today, the system monitors more than 700 miles of freeway (in each direction).  By taking advantage of the of the area's 1.5 million toll tags (transponders), the system determines travel speeds by calculating the time it takes a vehicle equipped with a toll tag to travel the distance between sensors along the roadway.

The technology won't prevent traffic congestion, of course, but at least now you'll instantly know why you're stuck and how long it will take to drive out of it.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Has no one considered enforcing traffic laws - such as following too closely to the vehicle ahead?  The minimum distance is usually defined by POSTED speed, not speed of the car ahead.

The reason I suggest this, is that you cannot have traffic jams if everyone stays that 200/100 feet back.  The reason for the congestion is the 'flinch' - someone slowing to avoid another driver.  The problem is that with tightly jammed traffic, no one can speed up again until everyone ahead has speeded up.  Space the cars and you lose the problem to the cars behind, recovering lost speed happens much quicker, flinches affect fewer cars.

And the law is on the books today, in all states.  Simply start walking down the lanes of stopped cars, and ticket anyone too close to the car ahead.
As far as the congestion goes nationwide, I think there needs to be a nationwide push to encourage companies to let their employees become telecommuters. It's a simple solution to the problem as it leads to less people on the  road, so many of us drive to offices to sit on a computer all day, when we could just as easily do it from home.
Brad and Tony's comments are very interesting. For starters, I think both ideas should be implemented. I think the government, not the state should maintain or be responsible for all freeway/highways in the nation. Maintenance and infrastructure vary widely state to state. Living in San Diego and commuting daily is a major headache and more. San Diego has very few freeways. This concentrates vehicles in a much smaller area vs. other cities with many major roadways and better asphalt access. San Diego's other major issue is the fact that the city is situated in between Mexico and Los Angeles. People wishing to commute to Mexico from points north and east of San Diego most likely squeeze through San Diego County via I-5 and I-15, two of the busiest, congested, most traveled roadways in SD. This makes for an ugly ride, resident or non-resident alike. Enough said.
    AS you know the highway system will never keep up with our population growth. Every U.S. city has the same traffic problems as many of our work force are going to work at exactly the same time.
   I suggest that we stagger everyone's work hours alphabetically; therefore the same amount of people coming to work for same amount of hours but would be coming into the city in 30 minute-45 minutes intervals.We use a system such as this, to vote,will-call reserved seatings at ball games and concerts, and some jobs such as phone company,American General, electric services etc.
    Maybe parents could go to work earlier so they might be able to get to a child's after school activity and childless  people could go in later and work later.
    This would need to be in agreement with employer and employees on a volunteer basis.Workers would be happier and production would be up nation wide because no one had to sit in traffic for a long time.
    Not as many highway grants are needed, if the highway system could handle the traffic. ASk people to turn their headlights for a week if they are willing to just try the new system.
    Example:A-C  6:30 A.M. to 3 P.M.
            D-G  7 A.M. to 3:30 P.M.
            H-L  7:30 A.M. to 4 P.M.
We watch Brian Williams every night and always appreciate his take on the day's news.  I guess my husband and I are the "grammar police;" we're of the age when correct grammar was important.  On last night's piece about traffic congestion, Brian introduced it by saying something like "If you're waiting for someone to get home tonight, at least tell them about this report."  It would have been so easy for Brian to say, "tell him or her about this report" and reinforce the use of good grammar.  Are we fighting a losing battle in the proper use of words and grammar?  I hope not.  The problem is that hearing incorrect grammar so jars us that we can't really properly listen to the remainder of the piece.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

RECENT STORIES FROM NIGHTLY NEWS

  • Nightly News section front

CONNECT WITH US

About the broadcast | Biographies

RSS is an easy way to get the news you want as it is updated even if you are not on MSNBC.com. More information about MSNBC.com's RSS feeds.

Subscribe to feed

Podcasting brings you audio and video from each weekday broadcast on your iPod or other portable MP3 player anytime, anywhere. More information about MSNBC.com's podcasts.

Subscribe to podcast

Sign-up for our daily e-mail newsletter. It offers a preview of the stories and special reports featured on each weekday broadcast.


Syndicate This Site

Add The Daily Nightly to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google